vegetaleb
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2009
- Posts
- 459
- Likes
- 92
Hello!
I want to decide which IEM BT to buy, between the Sony SBH50 which is BT 3.0 no aptx and Imarku which is BT 4.0 no aptx to use with my HTC M8 (BT 4.0 and aptx compatible).
I already tried my Hifiman RE-262 on an HTC BT 2.1 + aptx dongle and found the sound good but muffled compared to direct wired with the same IEM.
So my questions are:
-Will a BT 3.0 solution equal the 2.1 + aptx or better?
-Is a BT 4.0 IEM better than 3.0?
Can Sony implement a way to make its sbh50 BT 3.0 as good or better than the chinese Imarku with its BT 4.0? Like saying a Samsung high end 1080p 46'' TV will still look better than a TCL entry level 4K for example
I want to decide which IEM BT to buy, between the Sony SBH50 which is BT 3.0 no aptx and Imarku which is BT 4.0 no aptx to use with my HTC M8 (BT 4.0 and aptx compatible).
I already tried my Hifiman RE-262 on an HTC BT 2.1 + aptx dongle and found the sound good but muffled compared to direct wired with the same IEM.
So my questions are:
-Will a BT 3.0 solution equal the 2.1 + aptx or better?
-Is a BT 4.0 IEM better than 3.0?
Can Sony implement a way to make its sbh50 BT 3.0 as good or better than the chinese Imarku with its BT 4.0? Like saying a Samsung high end 1080p 46'' TV will still look better than a TCL entry level 4K for example
