Singapura
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Posts
- 634
- Likes
- 22
I'm using Wikipedia as a source in my work and have always relied on the fact that they try to present facts as neutral as possible. If there are controversies they are mentioned, including sources and sites where you can find more information. In the case of BOSE however the article reads like advertisement with only a few critical facts mentioned. (Audio enthusiasts frequently criticize Bose in online forums, accusing it of overpricing its products and criticizing the sound produced by Bose products.) followed immediately by quoting that BOSE won a libel lawsuit against Consumer Review. I don't consider myself part of the BOSE-bashing club here at head-fi but I wonder how valid Wikipedia articles like this are. Shouldn't there at least be a link to the "truth about BOSE" article? The number of links to glowing reviews of BOSE products is long but there is no mention of bad reviews at all. Am I missing something or is BOSE actually a pretty good brand?