Kwisatz
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2004
- Posts
- 296
- Likes
- 19
Quote:
While its impossible for me to make much sense out of that passage, I don't really need to read past the first line. Lest Bose has turned completely upside down and inside out from everything I've ever heard from them - a comparison between anything they've made and the B&W 800 series is laughable. There is no comparison - B&W's budget line surpasses pretty much everything Bose cranks out, let alone their 800 series. The same can be said for many brands of speakers that don't rely on pure hype, marketing buzz-words, and consumer ignorance to get people to buy their (over priced) products.
Originally Posted by oryaaaaa B&W 802N vs BOSE M3 (Price $12700 vs $400) M3 is the above in the quality of the bass in a near point . However, it is complete victory of 802N in high power in a far point. Another is a point near by a low volume and it is even. However, M3 is a poor balance by the bass, worsens by the source, and improves. The phenomenon of the volume's falling immediately after the bass is released has occurred when M3 is high power. Therefore, if the output is suppressed and used, M3 might be the best selection. |
While its impossible for me to make much sense out of that passage, I don't really need to read past the first line. Lest Bose has turned completely upside down and inside out from everything I've ever heard from them - a comparison between anything they've made and the B&W 800 series is laughable. There is no comparison - B&W's budget line surpasses pretty much everything Bose cranks out, let alone their 800 series. The same can be said for many brands of speakers that don't rely on pure hype, marketing buzz-words, and consumer ignorance to get people to buy their (over priced) products.