DemonicLemming
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Posts
- 953
- Likes
- 24
Quote:
There are quite a few different design parameters involved in a good sound dampening product - evidently you've never installed much to take note of those qualities that are important, and those that aren't. The ones I listed are the major ones - and yes, they play a huge difference in application and selection.
There's a huge difference in the density of something like....rocks....and normal car damping materials. That's why most is a tar-based, or uses materials with the density of tar, rather than something like foam. Mass doesn't equal density - that's why lining something with lead would cause it to be much less resonant than something lined with, say, aluminum.
And unless you do all your car audio reading on SoundDomain, I'm not too sure where you came up with your ideas about Dynamat not being the Bose of car audio....try CAF, ECA, and TermPro and see what they say about Dynamat
Not sure what the noobs like - maybe you buy your car audio gear at Best Buy? - but the experienced guys who actually know how to weight drivers, design ABC and snailshell boxes, and find out the natural resonance frequencies of individual car cabins typically don't use Dynamat. Or even talk about it, at that.
It's an entry-level product that does a mediocre job at it's given purpose, and it extremely overpriced. Yes, even on ebay. I might not know everything about headphones, but believe me, bub, I've forgotten more than you've ever known about car audio
Originally Posted by TMM /img/forum/go_quote.gif I find your comment hilarious given that it is a mass loading product. All it has to do is be heavy, and be convenient to install (i.e. stick to a surface well) of which it does both brilliantly. It's only purpose is to increase the mass and thus reduce the resonant frequency of the surface it is applied to ... it's not rocket science. If you glued rocks to the inside of a car door it would work just as well, but would be a pain in the arse to do. Also Dynamat isn't viewed like Bose in the Car Audio community, because i haven't heard of anyone who doesn't like it. Unless theres some super elite car audio group that hates it that i don't know about? It's not overpriced on ebay btw |
There are quite a few different design parameters involved in a good sound dampening product - evidently you've never installed much to take note of those qualities that are important, and those that aren't. The ones I listed are the major ones - and yes, they play a huge difference in application and selection.
There's a huge difference in the density of something like....rocks....and normal car damping materials. That's why most is a tar-based, or uses materials with the density of tar, rather than something like foam. Mass doesn't equal density - that's why lining something with lead would cause it to be much less resonant than something lined with, say, aluminum.
And unless you do all your car audio reading on SoundDomain, I'm not too sure where you came up with your ideas about Dynamat not being the Bose of car audio....try CAF, ECA, and TermPro and see what they say about Dynamat
It's an entry-level product that does a mediocre job at it's given purpose, and it extremely overpriced. Yes, even on ebay. I might not know everything about headphones, but believe me, bub, I've forgotten more than you've ever known about car audio