boodi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2001
- Posts
- 6,985
- Likes
- 1,489
double post
Originally Posted by plainsong I think that source/amp plays a biiiiiig role here, because while the dt531s do groove with the bithead, they really open up with the Nad/Perreaux setup. The difference can almost be night and day. |
Originally Posted by boodi ..yes imo it's due mostly to the fact dt531 are ultrasensible cans and also "quite receptive" they sound very different from setup to setup ( even more then cd3000 for my little exp. ) I'll try in the next future also some cable swap for them now you got me wanting to ear perreaux with my cans we could start thinking a central europe head-fi meeting for this summer .. [size=xx-small]i'd love you to give a listen to the earmax pro amp [/size] |
Originally Posted by plainsong they really open up with the Nad/Perreaux setup. The difference can almost be night and day. |
I almost believe they have some kind of harmonic distortion in them to make them sound "nicer". |
Originally Posted by plainsong We're having a meet in Finland sometime in August. |
Originally Posted by plainsong But with the Perreaux, I haven't listened to all my cd's yet, but certain recordings that I feel weren't so well mixed, like Gladiator and the LOTR soundtracks, are being done proud by the dt531s. They're injecting the Luuuv back in. |
Originally Posted by electic Where can I get these and how much are they? |
Originally Posted by boodi (imo) they're well worth 200+$ (I'm not joking) for what they offer ( most versatile cans i've tried up to now ) |
Originally Posted by saint.panda Although I agree with boodi that the 531 are extremely versatile I have to disagree that they can compare with 200$ headphones. I listened to them side by side with the Senn hd 600, sony 3k, beyer 880, etc. and the 531 were definatley inferior to all of them. |
To be honest I had high expectations from the 531 but they were not as groovy as I though they'd be and they sounded extremely simliar to the beyer 880 (in my ears), just lacked a couple of things in areas such as soundstage, details, refinement, comfort (yes, I find the Beyer 880 more comfortable),highs, mids, bass (not more bass but with more texture), .... - the 880 were simply better. And I'm not saying this because I own the 880. I would have loved to sell my Beyer 880 and get some 531 instead and save some money and have less problems with amplification ( this is where the 531 win because the 880 are pretty demanding when it comes to source and amp). On a lesser source and lesser amp than the Prehead and the Rega 2000, which I used for the evaluation, the 531 might have come even closer to the 880. |
Originally Posted by pbirkett Disagree here. I've owned the HD580, CD3000 and DT880, and the DT531 can happily trade blows with any of them. If they were so inferior, then why have I sold them and gone back to the 531's? Simple, because they are NOT inferior at all. Sure, the 531's are not superior in any particular regard, but neither are the the others. The 580 is probably more neutral and maybe a touch more realistic, but cannot even come close to the fun, bouncy aspect of the 531. They sound distinctly unimpressive compared to the 531 IMO. The CD3000 is probably even more exciting sounding than the 531, also a bit more refined. However, it cannot match the bass performance of the 531, it sounds extremely unforgiving, and is not as groovy as the 531. As usual, the low price tag of the cans means nobody will take them seriously. I've had the 880 as well. Far too boring and hifi orientated. Yes, they have a bigger soundstage, and smoother sound than the 531, but they cant rock out like the 531, the bass is nowhere near as punchy (I felt the 880 to be extremely thin out of every amp I've tried it with). I am amazed you think they sound anything alike to be honest, because they definitely dont!!! |