Ferrosa
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2013
- Posts
- 48
- Likes
- 28
Thanks! You're helping me a lot!


Thanks! You're helping me a lot!
![]()
The velours(especially after some compression, not as much of an issue with the DT 1990 since it uses memory foam pads) on the DT 1770 make it a bit more mid-range oriented pushing the bass and treble a bit back from the pleathers.
I already have a DT 770 PRO LE and the DT 150. I guess a closed one now would be great!
Ah, makes sense, though changing it up with an open-back would be worth trying. The DT 150 is excellent, one of my favorite Beyers. Haven't heard the DT 770 LE.
DT 770 is a less refined DT 1770. The treble may be excessive sometimes with my HRT microstreamer.
Ah makes sense, I've heard the DT 770 250 ohm and Premium 600 ohm, but not the other versions of it. HRT DACs can be a little much in the treble at times but overall enjoyed how they sounded, I did find the HRT MS HD I had to be the best about not going overboard with the treble, but it got replaced with the better sounding imho Sony UDA-1 for me. Will probably go for a Bifrost Multibit next, after my next amp which I haven't decided on what yet, eyeing a Lake People/Violectric amp or a nice tube amp to make the DT 1770/1990 shine.
DT 770 is a less refined DT 1770. The treble may be excessive sometimes with my HRT microstreamer.
I disagree. DT-1770 and DT-1990 are what many beyer-treble-averse users hoped beyerdynamic would one day evolve into, which they finally did by going a little easy on treble finally and becoming more balanced....
I'm just going to jut in here and ask if anyone has played games, specifically FPS, with the 1770 or 1990? I play a lot of CSGO and am looking for a headphone upgrade in the $600 range to replace my PC360 headset. Is the sound-stage substantially better on the 1990 than the 1770 (1990 being an open back, that's what I'd assume)? I won't mind the open back 1990 headphone, but if the closed back 1770 has good positional audio then they would be my pick.
Music-wise I'm sure both of these will please me.
Just what I thought beyerdynamic was trying to do. Officially announced just now: beyerdynamic Amiron
The successor to T90 by going easy on T90's original terrible treble. Bass and mids a bit more forward to make the more balanced SQ beyer's new house sound signature for both studio line and consumer line. Yay! Finally!! Way to go beyer!!
beyerdynamic Amiron
Successor to T90.
With detachable double-side cables.
Tesla 2.0 drivers.
Announced yesterday in Tokyo.
$599.
Someone create a new thread?!!
DT 1770 has a wonderful open-back-like soundstage. Terrific for a closed can. DT 1990 seems to have an edge, though, naturally being open-back. Positional accuracy is equally good on both but you might find many choices among many other brands for the purpose. I don't know them to give a comparison. The only games I played took place in vast playgrounds.![]()
Considered beyerdynamic MMX 300? Going for a company-discounted $280 in USA. (Maybe a successor with Tesla drivers about to be launched?) This old war horse MMX 300 is made for online gaming. Originally developed for aviation. Based on DT-880/770 housing. Solid build. Very efficient gooseneck microphone that doesn't pick up room noise. Very good positional accuracy. $280 is a very great steal.
http://north-america.beyerdynamic.com/shop/mmx-300.html
Also available in custom-design colours:
http://europe.beyerdynamic.com/shop/mmx-300-manufaktur.html?SID=f2eb7a08d70a831d775608c0142e5897&___store=en&___from_store=de
![]()
I have heard of the MMX 300, but I want a standalone headphone instead of a headset. I have a stand alone microphone now and would like a really nice pair of cans to pair it with the can accommodate gaming and music. I'm going to just assume the 1770 and 1990 have way better sound quality than the MMX 300. Thank you for your input on positional audio. I'll probably go with the 1770 so I can also roll with it in class or airports as it's a closed back.