Best headphones for 183.397 USD
Nov 27, 2004 at 4:42 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 42

knuxed

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Posts
136
Likes
0
This is going to be a very direct question.What are the best headphones that I can get unamped for 183.397 USD.I mainly listen to Jane Monheit and John Scofield Band so u shud know what sort of music i would listen to.Thank you in advance.It doesnt matter wheter its closed or open.Sound quality is my main criteria.Thank you
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 6:35 PM Post #3 of 42
Quote:

Originally Posted by lee0539
closed full sized? open full sized? canalphones?


His post said he didn't really care.
wink.gif
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 6:48 PM Post #4 of 42
Comfort, supra/circum, portable/home, build Q, SQ, anything? And, no, I have no idea who those artists are, and I'm not gonna try to find out.

Not very direct since you don't give us anything to work with. Do you know where the "search" button is? Try to get some idea of what you want, for goodness sakes. We're not gonna sit here playing guessing games. I'm just being honest, I do want to help if I can.
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 6:52 PM Post #5 of 42
I would say a mint used Audio Technica ATH-A900 or Grado SR-225, depending on your preference. A900 works very well without an amp where SR-225 works pretty descent without an amp (but the amp does make 'em sound even better).
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 7:35 PM Post #11 of 42
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blitzula
The Grados won't work...they're 183.407 USD.


lol. Still, I find the original number quite odd, since there shouldn't be more than two numbers past the decimal. Unless maybe you're converting from another form of currency.

The current recommendations are good, but we still need some of the inquirer's input, especially in regards to soundstage and presentation. Do you want to be a few rows back from the performance? Do you want to be on stage with them? Comfort is also fairly important since may people cannot stand grados in that respect.
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 7:45 PM Post #13 of 42
Quote:

Originally Posted by stet
no, a tenth of a cent


Eh 183.407- 183.397= .01
and isnt a cent one hundreth of a dollar? like Centimes in France, one hundreth, and .01 is a hundreth of a dollar and if a cent is a hundreth of a dollar then its a whole cent not a tenth of a cent.
 
Nov 27, 2004 at 7:48 PM Post #14 of 42
Quote:

Originally Posted by MartinJ
Eh 183.407- 183.397= .01
and isnt a cent one hundreth of a dollar? like Centimes in France, one hundreth, and .01 is a hundreth of a dollar and if a cent is a hundreth of a dollar then its a whole cent not a tenth of a cent.



duh. I don't know why, I was just fixed on that extra digit...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top