Beats banned at World Cup 2014 by.....
post-10647913
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 10

AUDIOBREEDER

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
1,596
Reaction score
89
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Posts
1,596
Likes
89
.... The one and only :)
 
Short story because Sony is sponsoring the World Cup 2014
Whats next?
 
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-beats-headphones-are-banned-from-the-world-cup/
 
     Share This Post       
post-10648660
Post #2 of 10

squallkiercosa

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
165
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Posts
2,164
Likes
165
There's no story:
 
The World cup is only possible thanks to the Sponsors, whether their product is good or bad (Budweiser I'm looking at you) participants have to use what they get and wearing something else is almost offensive to some extend for those who are actually paying for the event itself.
Beats were banned during the London Olympics for the same reason, in fact any other brand or product going against sponsors was without a doubt banned as well.  
Neymar didn't use their headphones because he wanted: How much money you think Beats paid Neymar and his dad for the TV ads and to be seen wearing Beats everywhere during the world cup? 
 
Even if a product doesn't go against their sponsors, no team is allowed to wear any visible brand during the games, practices and press conferences. To give you an example: How many player do you see wearing sunglasses? (which are far more useful than headphones) Is FIFA against ray-ban or Oakley?
 
     Share This Post       
post-10648787
Post #3 of 10

LFC_SL

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
3,529
Reaction score
246
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Posts
3,529
Likes
246
This is no reflection on Beats. Just as Coca-Cola and Pepsi or Visa and MasterCard sponsor different events. So it ends up you can only buy WC tickets with visa

Nice try though.

Also I keep saying Beats deserve props for what they have done. You do not have to like their sound but it led to traditional headphone manufacturers reassessing their portable on-ear style offerings
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Silent Xaxal
post-10649199
Post #4 of 10

kurochin

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
887
Reaction score
222
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Posts
887
Likes
222
Originally Posted by squallkiercosa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
Neymar didn't use their headphones because he wanted: How much money you think Beats paid Neymar and his dad for the TV ads and to be seen wearing Beats everywhere during the world cup? 
 
Quoting this because it needs to be quoted. Most of these celebrities are photographed wearing beats because they're paid to do so - they're sponsored. You'll never know what they really use in their own time. I'm pretty sure LeBron James could afford a top-end speaker system in his private gym if he wanted to.
 
Regarding this CBS non-story;
Conflict of interest between event/corporate sponsors and personal sponsors for athletes has been going on for years. Some companies have a gentlemans agreement running, simply because the show must go on - like Nike or Puma sponsored players in an Adidas sponsored event. That's not always set in stone for all segments, though. You'd never see a Monster Energy sponsored rider riding a GP bike with Red Bull livery on it, for example, nor would you see a Tissot sponsored driver in a Tag Heuer sponsored F1 car.
 
There's a bigger chance that Apple/Beats actually paid CBS to do this write-up in order to get more people onto that Youtube video, hence giving further exposure to Beats and generating more sales. Guerilla Anything 101 - Sneak, Surround, Smother.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: squallkiercosa
post-10649300
Post #5 of 10

Silent Xaxal

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
360
Reaction score
29
Joined
May 16, 2014
Posts
360
Likes
29
   
Quoting this because it needs to be quoted. Most of these celebrities are photographed wearing beats because they're paid to do so - they're sponsored. You'll never know what they really use in their own time. I'm pretty sure LeBron James could afford a top-end speaker system in his private gym if he wanted to.
 
Regarding this CBS non-story;
Conflict of interest between event/corporate sponsors and personal sponsors for athletes has been going on for years. Some companies have a gentlemans agreement running, simply because the show must go on - like Nike or Puma sponsored players in an Adidas sponsored event. That's not always set in stone for all segments, though. You'd never see a Monster Energy sponsored rider riding a GP bike with Red Bull livery on it, for example, nor would you see a Tissot sponsored driver in a Tag Heuer sponsored F1 car.
 
There's a bigger chance that Apple/Beats actually paid CBS to do this write-up in order to get more people onto that Youtube video, hence giving further exposure to Beats and generating more sales. Guerilla Anything 101 - Sneak, Surround, Smother.
 
Sounds more Beats than it does Apple, honestly.
 
     Share This Post       
post-10649368
Post #6 of 10

kurochin

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
887
Reaction score
222
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Posts
887
Likes
222
  Sounds more Beats than it does Apple, honestly.
 
True. Apple was never keen on celebrity endorsements. This was probably all Beats comissioned months before the sale to Apple. Btw, I think the actual Youtube ad is quite good, guerilla or not. Full props to them.
 
     Share This Post       
post-10649402
Post #7 of 10

Redcarmoose

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
19,574
Reaction score
13,442
Location
.
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Location
.
Posts
19,574
Likes
13,442




Seriously, I mean Beets have never hurt anyone. Ya, they can stain cloths and some folks just don't like vegetables but why ban them from the World Cup?:mad:
 
     Share This Post       
post-10660884
Post #8 of 10

cb3723

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
16
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Posts
1,562
Likes
16
Reading the linked article it's saying the beats ban is a win for beats nonetheless - SONY must be pretty pi**ed -lol :D

As for celebs getting paid to wear beats - if they feature in a beats ad, then clearly they are getting paid for it, but when you stars paparazzi pics wearing beats - aren't these just their personal cans? Sure they may have been gifted to them by dre who knows paparazzi pics featuring celebs with his cans is free and powerful marketing, but just because a celeb has millions in the bank doesn't necessarily mean they would only use beats unless they were getting paid.

Some people (actually a freakin lot of people) buy beats as a personal choice, well heeled or not :wink:
 
     Share This Post       
post-10661682
Post #9 of 10

vantt1

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
4,745
Reaction score
563
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Posts
4,745
Likes
563
Some people (actually a freakin lot of people) buy beats as a personal choice, well heeled or not
I discovered the celebrity endorsements after I got my first pair of Beats, actually. I was drawn in by the fancy stand at the electronics section of a department store when I got the original Studios. Sure, they had terrible ANC, but I personally liked the folding design, and the artificially enhanced bass they're infamous for. Knowing myself, I could easily disable the ANC, so I took a chance and bought it. 
 
One of the most versatile sets in my collection, and easily my most used one, too!
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: cb3723
post-10675300
Post #10 of 10

stixclgi

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Messages
1
Reaction score
10
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Posts
1
Likes
10
Reading the linked article it's saying the beats ban is a win for beats nonetheless - SONY must be pretty pi**ed -lol


As for celebs getting paid to wear beats - if they feature in a beats ad, then clearly they are getting paid for it, but when you stars paparazzi pics wearing beats - aren't these just their personal cans? Sure they may have been gifted to them by dre who knows paparazzi pics featuring celebs with his cans is free and powerful marketing, but just because a celeb has millions in the bank doesn't necessarily mean they would only use beats unless they were getting paid.

Some people (actually a freakin lot of people) buy beats as a personal choice, well heeled or not
 
I'm sure some of the celebrities may actually like Beats, and I'm sure some of them are paid to wear them. As prevalent as the paparazzi is, as well as regular people with camera phones, celebs can be videoed/photographed at anytime. I think its a savvy business move to pay people to wear a product anytime they're out.
 
Of the celebs who wear Beats outside of commercials, I wonder how many of them are audiophiles? Like, aside from the obvious people, how many musicians do you see wearing Beats headsets or in-ears out in the public? Obviously they can afford much more expensive, better sounding headsets, so like you said, I'm sure it's personal preference...Or just trendy.
 
*Note* Not a Beats bash, just a question...I've owned two pairs of Beats products and I like them for what they are.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top