I like the CM's more. The CM's are B&W's attempt at a more refined sound than the 705, and they actually share a lot in common with the 805 due to trickle down, and B&W reps have mentioned that they think the tweeter was an improvement over the 705 tweeter. However, what the 705 does better is image better due to the externally mounted tweeter which gives the 705 better 3D spaciality, and the 705 beats the CM in dynamics and headroom. I found the sound of the 705 a bit too bright and analytical overall, it can even sound a bit ragged at higher volumes.
In terms of mids, the CM is a bit colored more than the 705 due to a slight depression in the FR in the upper mids. In real world listening, the mids can sound a bit recessed but smooth and pleasing. A lot of people say the CM sounds lush but I think the slight coloration actually makes the mids sound warmer than they are.
I wouldn't take a 705 over a CM but I would take a 805 over the CM.
Personally I also just like the looks, the CM is like a little jewel of a speaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by luciyuspax /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have listened to CM1s and they are great for latin jazz! CM1 is good at mid-range but I was not impressed with them when I listened through them to baroque music.They are not very detailed in highs.
I really could not hear the details well in bach's orchestral music like cembalo part through CM1s like I could with my Sennheiser HD555.
|
Headphones always edge most lower end speakers in terms of resolution. Also the room has a lot to do with what details you can hear, because even if a speaker has good detail to start with, high frequency energy easily gets soaked up into the room. I've heard the CM's nearfield and the detail is there, it's not very upfront about it (re: see my statement above), it's also more like the HD600, the emphasis is more on a lush musical sound than "hear the details in your face" sound.