[B]Very Short Bang & Olufsen A8 Earphone Review[/B]
Mar 11, 2002 at 1:41 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 3

Blighty

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Posts
376
Likes
10
I'd write a longer review but I find there is not much else good to say about them and there are enough threads with negative opinions as it is

Just for the record, I purchased a pair of B&O A8s because of conflicting opinion between several headfiers. Fjhuerta(from mexico) was one of the earlier members who purchased a pair and had nothing good to say about them while, Dlorde(UK), the other owner, was quite impressed with their sound quality. I let them burn in for 100+ hours before putting them on for a 5 hour listening session(all I could stand). As much as I liked the design and wanted to be impressed by them..... I had to admit they were quite inferior in many areas of the sonic spectrum
frown.gif


In their defence, I must say that they are also one of the most comfortable pair of earphones/buds/headphones that I have ever worn. You do not even notice you are wearing them. The aluminum finish is elegant and exudes class. The cable is thin as these are meant for portable use but I did not find the connections nor the cord weak in relation to other portable phones.

My biggest complaint is that low frequency extension is abruptly cut off before 100Hz which takes away plenty from the listening experience. Mid and upper bass is there but not very involving or enveloping at all compared with a set of KSC-35s(which take the reward for ugliest portable phone as I have stated before). The lower and mid-range is rather uneventful and at best average when compared with other earphones. However, upper-mids and highs are crystal clear and edge out the Sony E888s a bit. Although the 888 wins by a comfortable margin in bass response and even mid-range.

Spatial imaging on the A8s is annoying(to me) to say the least. It feels like a hard pinpoint in the middle of your head that just cannot escape. Regrettably, this effect gives me a bit of a headache over time. Their ability to reproduce an adequate soundstage is obviously ineffectual to put it politely.

If I seem harsh(yeah right), it is due to the fact that these retail between $160-200USD normally. I was fortunate to pick them up for roughly $108USD shipped total. Had these been given a MSRP of $100 and street of perhaps $70USD they would have deserved a recommendation for their great style and comfort factor. As it stands, I would rather recommend the Koss KSC-35, Senn MX500 and Sony E888LP over the B&O A8, unless style and comfort is more important to the listener than fidelity.

In retrospect, I should have listened to the bashers but I am a sucker for aesthetics.

Now that I got that off my chest, all I need to do is track down dlorde and introduce him to my smatchet. j/k
very_evil_smiley.gif
evil_smiley.gif
very_evil_smiley.gif


Well maybe not had I not been able to dump them onto a lucky buyer. My total loss was less than $20 so I will call it a fair game for a lesson learned the hard way.
 
Mar 11, 2002 at 2:04 AM Post #2 of 3
well the b&o feels like the akg 1000

so they are comfortable

if you do like the crystal clear like details
but hate the bass
hehe

maybe do a kwkarth
but get a subwoofer to crossover 100 hrtz

and punch out more midbass and lower bass

but then you'd probably need a good velodyne to get it to sound good

haha
 
Mar 11, 2002 at 3:05 AM Post #3 of 3
Quote:

Originally posted by r3cc0s
well the b&o feels like the akg 1000

so they are comfortable


haha, you make me laugh on this one.
I just took the AKG off my head and put the HD580's on one minute ago, then I saw this. Wearing K1000's for more than an hour is not "comfortable," but I can wear the Senn for a few hours.

Blighty, thanks for being a "brave" man. $20 dollars seem like a good learning experience.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top