arcsurfer
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2012
- Posts
- 7
- Likes
- 0
Yea I know...I just thought I'd throw in my two cents.
M50 doesn't have enough bass... it has a good amount of impact, but the vents prevent the drivers from delivering a full blow so that it won't muddy up the rest of the spectrum... plus sound quality isn't preference, but how good something sounds is
Why dont you compare them to something like Grado 325, Denon 2k, HD 600, DT880 or similar priced cans? Then lets see how well the beats stand up.
Comparing ATH M50 with a can which costs 3 times more is just silly.
The reasons people say they dont like the Audiotechnicas is:
1- They don't know how to equalize.
2- They don't give it (the m50s) enough time to burn in.
Once the m50s have burned in completely, they are tons better then the beats.
PS- I have both.
The fanboy bandwagon BS around the M50 is utter crap. The sound is tinny, harsh, and the soundstage is a total cluster ****
Imo, the Beats Pros kill the M50. Yep. I said it. Sound is better, assembly is superior, and to me so is comfortability (after I stretched the headband out). With proper burn in (The pros took a full week due to their metal build and dynamic speakers) the Beats have a warmer sound that to me makes the M50s sound harsh, tinny, and boring, but a neutral response is what you want if you're monitoring music. But for someone who likes to kick back and listen to my Dubstep and house music, Beats Pro hands down. But then again, its a four hundred dollar headphone compared to a 150 dollar one. The M50 is a better value, but the Pros are a better headphone.
(Purchased the Pros for only 250 at Best buy, a great deal in my opinion.)