Well, I just got back from Episode II. And truthfully, I thought it was terrible. There were some good scenes, but overall a good movie it did not make, as Yoda might say.
The dialog was absolutely pathetic. Whoever wrote the script should be shot. Some of Anakin's lines were just horrible. Horrible. ("I hate sand." Ha, I'll never forget that.) I laughed so hard at so many points in the movie, and I usually don't even laugh at comedies. Except that the parts I laughed at weren't supposed to be funny. His acting didn't help anything.
Samuel L. Jackson's character, whoever he was, seemed completely out of place; Obie Wan (sp?) had some lines that were almost as bad as Anakin's, though his acting was better. The bad guys in the movie were decent, as were the computerized characters for the most part. Natalie Portman acted pretty well. And, yes, she's hot.
But back to the criticism. The plot was kind of convoluted, definitely could have been more on track. If anyone can tell me why the movie was called "Attack of the Clones," I'd appreciate it -- they never attacked anybody, unless I fell asleep without noticing it.
The Yoda fight scene was fun. That maybe made the whole movie worthwhile, if you can forget some things about the rest of it. I'd suggest you still go see it, or at least see it eventually. Maybe it wasn't a terrible movie -- it definitely wasn't good though.
Oh yeah, and the sound in this theater was atrocious. There was a broken speaker and the bass made it flap all over the place. Was annoying as hell. That and I don't think the theater even had DSS, or if it did it was pathetic.
kerelybonto