Arcam A65 plus vs creek 4330 mkII vs Audio Analogue Puccini
post-160045
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 4

bundee1

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 23, 2002
Messages
2,955
Reaction score
12
Joined
Jul 23, 2002
Posts
2,955
Likes
12
Which should I get? I think my gear is listed below and the system sounds a bit bright with thin vocals due to the Yamaha and Music Hall combo. I also think it needs a little more bass. Its all being played through PSB Alpha A/Vs. With proper placement it sounds pretty good, but my S.O. moves stuff around to clean and misplacing makes my ears bleed. I need something that would complement the cdp. The speakers would be my next upgrade. Any other integrated recommendations are welcome
and website and dealer suggestions would help. Thank you all for your input.
 
     Share This Post       
post-161574
Post #2 of 4

bundee1

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 23, 2002
Messages
2,955
Reaction score
12
Joined
Jul 23, 2002
Posts
2,955
Likes
12
Bueller... Bueller... Bueller...?
 
     Share This Post       
post-161604
Post #3 of 4

lini

Thought the last line in Citizen Kane was nosebud.
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Messages
6,117
Reaction score
21
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
6,117
Likes
21
These are very nice integrated amps, you've mentioned - though the Puccini has no headphone jack, as far as I remember. In addition, you could probably also consider the NAD C370, the Marantz PM8000 and PM8200 and maybe a Rotel, too... But I couldn't say, which one is the best - they are all in a similar class, so you'd better listen for yourself, which suits your tastes best.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

P.S.: Bueller!
 
     Share This Post       
post-161611
Post #4 of 4

rtsy

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 30, 2002
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Joined
May 30, 2002
Posts
47
Likes
0
I recently helped a firend put together an audio system based on the JMR Twins mkII. Surf over to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pinoydiophiles and do a search on the AA Puccini.

To cut a long story short, I heard the Arcam A85, Musical Fidelity A3, various Rotels, and the Audio Analogue Puccini. We ended up with the Puccini.

The Arcam and the Rotels have generally classic solid state conis characters of extended highs and well-controlled lows. The Puccini, while solid state, has attributes commonly possessed by tubed gear, warmth/liquidity. The Musical Fidelity A3 is sort of in between the Arcam and the Puccini.

Note further that among the stuff we listened to, the Puccini is the cheapest.

Please note that I am not bashing Arcam. We bought the Arcam CD72 as our source.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top