My apologies, gentlemen: First for dropping out of the discussion last night just as it heated up. And second for stirring up this hornets nest with my posts comparing SMSL M200 and Gustard A18/X16. I had deliberately avoided posting my M200 experiences sooner because I didn't want to troll this nice thread, and because I didn't want M200 owners to think less of their DACs.
OTOH, I really like the way you guys conducted the discussion. And I like the consensus a lot!
We owe Amir and ASR a debt of gratitude for calling out some of the bluffs in the high-end audio industry over the last 50 years. Some of these manufacturers were (and still are) on the border of outright scams. And for decades they've had this unholy alliance with publishers and reviewers, who were rewarded with gear worth tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dollars, and often advertising too, in exchange for positive reviews. The claims of which nobody could verify.
No doubt measurements have a place in responsible design, manufacture and review of audio gear. I am not hearing anybody say otherwise. It's a great way to catch design flaws, production snafus -- and yes, snake oil salesmen -- because analyzers can detect faint signals which our ears cannot.
ASR has provided some transparency for consumers in comparing the measurable aspects of components from different manufacturers. No established business in any industry ever wants transparency, since it forces them to compete on price -- that's the last thing they want! Marketing departments exist almost entirely to shield companies from having to compete on price. So that contribution from ASR is indisputably a great thing!
But some ASR members have taken it too far, believing that their $100 component is fully comparable (or even superior to) $5,000 ones based on measurements alone. Sure, sometimes they really are comparable or superior! Other times not. There is a reason
Amir uses a $50,000 pair of Mark Levinson No53 to drive his speakers: One being he can afford it, the other that they just sound better!
In addition to being a forum for folks who truly know their science, ASR has also attracted crowds who have no clue, and don't know what the measurements really show -- or what their limitations are. They just want to feel they got a great deal and are sticking it to the man (the expensive manufacturer). It is very comforting to be in a group where all agree on the same viewpoint, even if it's a fantasy.
There is nothing wrong with being a newbie, we all have been and still are in various fields of life. I know I am. But newbies who think they discovered the Holy Grail can be dangerous. To themselves and to others.
This success of ASR has led to a shift in the industry towards products that measure well, regardless of how they sound -- as long as they sound good enough that people with untrained ears cannot hear the flaws. And that, in my opinion, is NOT a great thing!
I have more to say on the subject of DACs supposedly all sounding the same, but I'm afraid it'll have to be another day