Another PCB Layout - Gilmore Dynalo / Dynamid
Nov 14, 2004 at 8:05 AM Post #16 of 287
Oh and four layer boards? I hope you have a pretty deep pocket
biggrin.gif
. They will be spendy in small quantities.
 
Dec 5, 2004 at 7:16 AM Post #17 of 287
I don't mind the cost of the four layer board if it provide real benefits. I've been building up 6 dynahi boards (2 layer) and working on the prototype dynahi power supply (2 layer) lately.

BUT... I'm getting back on *this* project on Monday. I'm thinking that a two layer board with a topside ground plane and some bottomside power rail fills might do the trick and then the price stay under $200 for a 20 piece proto run. Otherwise, four layer boards from North American suppliers seem to fetch a minimum of $400 for a 20 piece order.

I think there's lots of people who will want to build this board. The dynahi is too big, hot, and expensive for a lot of folks. Hope to post a few updates later next week...
 
Dec 5, 2004 at 12:35 PM Post #18 of 287
Indeed there's a lot of people who have built this
600smile.gif
 
Dec 6, 2004 at 3:14 AM Post #19 of 287
hi, been searching for a resonably priced dynalo/dynamid pcb. dgardner, thank you for initiating and sharing. i will definitely join in the group buy if my wallet permits. by the way, is MPS8099/MPS8599 a much better choice compared to 2SA1015/2SC1815 specs/performance wise (to anyone who tried them)? i could not find mps8x99 specs sheet
confused.gif
and vendor as well, thanks again.
 
Dec 6, 2004 at 4:10 AM Post #20 of 287
Quote:

Originally Posted by jogor
hi, been searching for a resonably priced dynalo/dynamid pcb. dgardner, thank you for initiating and sharing. i will definitely join in the group buy if my wallet permits. by the way, is MPS8099/MPS8599 a much better choice compared to 2SA1015/2SC1815 specs/performance wise (to anyone who tried them)? i could not find mps8x99 specs sheet
confused.gif
and vendor as well, thanks again.



The MPS8099/8599 were Motorola, but is now On Semiconductor:
http://www.onsemi.com/site/products/...PS8099,00.html
http://www.onsemi.com/site/products/...PS8599,00.html

These are good transistors and can be used in lieu of the 2SC1815/2SA1015. Note the pin-outs are different! Here are some basic comparisons:

2SC1815/2SA1015:
Vce 50V, Ic 150mA, Pd 400mW, hfe 100 typ, Ft 100MHz

MP8099/8599:
Vce 80V, Ic 500mA, Pd 625mW, hfe 100 min, 300 max, Ft 150Mhz

One advantage of the 2SC1815/2SA1015 is that its hfe is very linear over a wide Ic range. This makes them easier to match.

The MPS8099/8599 are available from Digikey. The 2SC1815/2SA1015 are available from BD Enterprises.
 
Dec 10, 2004 at 10:01 PM Post #22 of 287
Can anyone tell me what the hole spacing, hole size, and body diameter would be for Black Gate caps in the 100-200uF range. I can't seem to find a datasheet out there. Right now, I have 0.300" leadspacing for eletrolytic bulk caps. I've heard that's too small for Black Gate users. Help!


I found ELNA Cerafines Caps. These have 10mm diameters and 5 mm lead spacing. Should live happily in a 0.200 lead space cap footprint if the holesize is generous enough.

What other esoteric electrolytic caps do people want to be able to use???
 
Dec 11, 2004 at 1:20 AM Post #23 of 287
What that's not what i said further up. 300mils holespacing is fine for 470uf 16v blackgates which I use in my Dynalo. 200mils (5mm) is suitable for the 220uf 25v BGs i had in my old one.

Also now that i've got mine working i can confirm that a 1k pot inplace of the 500ohm bias resistor does wonders for DC offset. No matching required
biggrin.gif
 
Dec 11, 2004 at 8:53 AM Post #25 of 287
600mils

/EDIT: take a guess what changed in this post
biggrin.gif
 
Dec 21, 2004 at 3:01 PM Post #27 of 287
hey has there been any progress on this?

im assuming this is a lot easier to work on then the dynahi, and can fit in a smaller enclosure? if so then im in
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Dec 21, 2004 at 8:28 PM Post #29 of 287

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top