drewd
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Posts
- 727
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
Yep, that's a problem. What I was getting at was that there are quite a few topologies out there. There is not one universal diamond buffer, but several different implementations. Component selection is, of course, the key.
It may be best to leave the output buffer as a DIP8 part and not even mess with trying to get something on the PCB. That would make the whole prototyping issue much easier by reducing the number of things that can go wrong. It also would let me reduce the board size and still leave an option for those who want to pursue a diamond buffer.
To answer your question, no, a discrete diamond buffer is not necessary.
-Drew
Originally Posted by individual6891 Will a diamond buffer be absolutely necessary? Modifying another circuit are you absolutely sure you can guarantee stability?..Which would require extensive prototype testing.. Diamond buffers designed from scratch to fit a specific circuit run into stability problem - is there such a thing "universal diamond buffer" out there? I maybe wrong, but I was under the impression that diamond buffers were very sensitive to the components around it.. |
Yep, that's a problem. What I was getting at was that there are quite a few topologies out there. There is not one universal diamond buffer, but several different implementations. Component selection is, of course, the key.
It may be best to leave the output buffer as a DIP8 part and not even mess with trying to get something on the PCB. That would make the whole prototyping issue much easier by reducing the number of things that can go wrong. It also would let me reduce the board size and still leave an option for those who want to pursue a diamond buffer.
To answer your question, no, a discrete diamond buffer is not necessary.
-Drew