motifone
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2004
- Posts
- 42
- Likes
- 0
hi there
I have been downloading some files from allofmp3.com. Generally, I use their service that encodes directly from the source CDROM. I have been buying the resulting encodes at 192 AAC. However, there are a few songs I want on allofmp3 that are not offered as direct encodes from the source CDROM -- rather they come from a 384kbps MP3 source file.
Since I have been ordering 192 AAC files from that site, would it be better better to transcode from the 384kbps file to 192AAC or would I be better off just getting a 192 or 256kbps MP3 file (I'm saying 256kbps MP3 because that is considered the equivalent I guess of a 192kbps AAC).
Are they both considering transcoding, whether you go from 384kbps MP3 to 192 AAC or from 384kbps MP3 to 192kpbs MP3? Which process would probably yield a better sounding file?
thanks in advance!!
I have been downloading some files from allofmp3.com. Generally, I use their service that encodes directly from the source CDROM. I have been buying the resulting encodes at 192 AAC. However, there are a few songs I want on allofmp3 that are not offered as direct encodes from the source CDROM -- rather they come from a 384kbps MP3 source file.
Since I have been ordering 192 AAC files from that site, would it be better better to transcode from the 384kbps file to 192AAC or would I be better off just getting a 192 or 256kbps MP3 file (I'm saying 256kbps MP3 because that is considered the equivalent I guess of a 192kbps AAC).
Are they both considering transcoding, whether you go from 384kbps MP3 to 192 AAC or from 384kbps MP3 to 192kpbs MP3? Which process would probably yield a better sounding file?
thanks in advance!!