Gorlakk3.v
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2007
- Posts
- 13
- Likes
- 0
Thanks, Aflac...doesn't sound like the K-240S will compare after all of my years with the 240M. I guess it's off to e-bay or repair shop.
Originally Posted by Gorlakk3.v /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well, I suppose any used K-240M on e-Bay will not have the kind of mileage mine has seen. Since they've been discontinued, I wonder if people will feel the need to charge more for them. Guess I'll just have to take a look. |
Originally Posted by MaZa /img/forum/go_quote.gif 600ohms versus 50ohms. Marginally? Qualitywise perhaps, but not volume. Though i do understand that impedance doesnt tell the whole story. |
Originally Posted by MaZa /img/forum/go_quote.gif K240S is later model, based on old K240M. K240M was harder to drive and had flat sound, where K240S has boosted bass and easier to drive. Also treble is bit recessed. Overall sound is pleasant to listen. Sweet mids and highs, but bass is bit slow. Strong, but not focused. |
Originally Posted by Vinlle /img/forum/go_quote.gif is there any same price range headphone can give a better bass performance? |
Originally Posted by qazwsx /img/forum/go_quote.gif K81DJ--punchier but still very upfront. |
Originally Posted by adamse /img/forum/go_quote.gif Okay, so I'm thinking of buying the 240S as my first real headphone. Are they really as bad as you say, or is it that you all are used to better phones? |
Originally Posted by adamse /img/forum/go_quote.gif Okay, so I'm thinking of buying the 240S as my first real headphone. Are they really as bad as you say, or is it that you all are used to better phones? |