Quote:
Originally Posted by davidhw
Ah, OK. The only reason I was thinking of doing it was because I read somewhere here on HF that a review from Stereophile(?) said that USB had 3x the jitter of optical. I might have misread that, though.
|
There's a zillion threads on optical vs. USB on Head-Fi. Unfortunately, they are scattered everywhere.
Here's the latest one with specs per TheSloth:
http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=178906
I use both USB and optical with Micro DAC. USB is nice due to it's flexibility: One can use it on most computers and laptops, but it can have power/ground issues and doesn't sound as clear as optical.
Optical sounds best, but not as readily available on hardware unless extra stuff like Transit or AirPort Express is bought.
USB vs. optical: I like optical for clarity and no noise. I like USB for a more transportable, simpler rig. They each have their place in my opinion. We should all be extremely happy that the Micro DAC provides so much digital input flexibility. Everyone interested should try it out and judge for themselves. But it seems from what I've read posted here that many people find the extra cost and items for optical makes it worth it.
Also given the correct hardware and software settings, upsampling can be used also as an extra option to see if one prefers it or not:
http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showt...=136059&page=3
See post #57 above for great info on Mac upsampling, if one has the hardware and wishes to try it on a Mac with an integral hardware optical out.
I haven't tried upsampling myself as I don't have the hardware.
Yes, choices, facts, opinions, and preferences can be so confusing sometimes especially when we all have different preferences and have different pre-existing hardware.
Whatever you choose to get, just make sure you can a refund in case it doesn't fit your expectations or hardware/software.
Let us know how you like your MicroDAC
.