[ZephyrSapphire]

Isn't ERS paper made for shielding things which basically means reduce the degradation of the quality, not actually improving the sound?

 

[krmathis]

Not many others have K1000, Genesis and ERS paper around here. Hence a bit hard to confirm your findings.
As long as you are pleased its fine though...

 

[SR-71Panorama]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick82 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I posted my Genesis power cable thread in the cables forum and it was moved here. I'm confused, where will I post?

maybe just stick to youtube then?

No one is going to 'confirm your findings'.

 

[obobskivich]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR-71Panorama /img/forum/go_quote.gif maybe just stick to youtube then? No one is going to 'confirm your findings'.

bitter much?

and zephyr: how would it reduce the quality, if its just adding shielding? (unless I'm misunderstanding your question)

 

[smeggy]

I have a T-amp and a K1000. I don't use the T-amp for my K1000. Not even if strung together with the most expensive bell wire I could find wrapped in a Faraday cage.

 

[SR-71Panorama]

Quote:

Originally Posted by obobskivich /img/forum/go_quote.gif bitter much?

When one person posts the same thing over and over, and it has nothing to do with the forum it occupies, yes.

 

[obobskivich]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR-71Panorama /img/forum/go_quote.gif When one person posts the same thing over and over, and it has nothing to do with the forum it occupies, yes.

posted the same thing over and over?

I've never actually seen him start two identical threads

and it surely has to do with this forum, "covering headphones, earphones, and portable audio", pretty sure the K1000 and modifications to such classify as appropriate?


but god forbid we upset the forum-nazi, he might throw bricks at us!

 

[tintin47]

Instead of ers paper, why don't you just build a big faraday cage around your entire set up, Patrick? That would stop all interference.

 

[SR-71Panorama]

Quote:

posted the same thing over and over? I've never actually seen him start two identical threads and it surely has to do with this forum, "covering headphones, earphones, and portable audio", pretty sure the K1000 and modifications to such classify as appropriate? but god forbid we upset the forum-nazi, he might throw bricks at us!

His posts in the summit section have been about cables and speakers, both of which fit rather conveniently in the Quote:

'Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories'

sub-forum. With the added benefit of not polluting this sub-forum with repetitive shots of toilet paper rolls gift wrapped around whatever sliced and diced wire was purchased this week.

The nazi thing is also quite ingenious. Think of that all on your own?

 

[obobskivich]

actually his threads get moved from the cables board onto the summit-fi board


and if you don't like them, why click into them?

and yeah, I did think of it all on my own, IM A BIG KID TOO YA KNOW

 

[SR-71Panorama]

The answer to that riddle lies in my first post.

One thread was moved here, not all of them.

 

[obobskivich]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR-71Panorama /img/forum/go_quote.gif The answer to that riddle lies in my first post. One thread was moved here, not all of them.

whatever.

people in glass houses shouldn't throw bricks, as the case may be

 

[SR-71Panorama]

Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio - Search Results

Looks to be one or two threads on topic.

 

[pompon]

ERS only filter a specific range of frequency. A simple faraday cut them all.

Foil paper with ground attached should be a faraday right ?

 

[ZephyrSapphire]

Quote:

Originally Posted by obobskivich /img/forum/go_quote.gif bitter much? and zephyr: how would it reduce the quality, if its just adding shielding? (unless I'm misunderstanding your question)

You definitely misunderstood. My question was like.

It's shielding.
Let's say you get 8% of RFI and EMI.
Add ERS.
Reduces RFI and EMI to 0%.
My question is;
How would that be "improving" if it's just shielding and getting the 0%, which is what it already should have been to begin with?

Seriously, the word "improve" has been highly abused, shielding should not be "improving" the quality. It should just be "reducing the interference and returning the quality back to what it originally was".

In another anatomy, it's like some third party software which reduces the "loudness" in digital music files. Oh how I wish that software was real.