wakibaki
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Posts
- 1,088
- Likes
- 68
Quit griping. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Given the large numbers of spurious claims we encounter you should be disappointed if yours is examined any less rigorously.
I am simply asking questions I would expect you to ask, and consequently have a ready answer for. What measures were taken in these tests to ensure that there was no transducer-introduced effect? Or is it widely accepted that what you generate mathematically will be reflected in the pressure at the hearers eardrum?
It's just that, looking at your waveform, I'm thinking, what could upset the perception of volume in this case? Or the actual volume of the components? The first thing that occurs to me is an assymetric excursion of the driving element. Such as might occur if the signal had a DC offset?
With regard to the miking of the drumkit, I couldn't agree more.
w
Given the large numbers of spurious claims we encounter you should be disappointed if yours is examined any less rigorously.
I am simply asking questions I would expect you to ask, and consequently have a ready answer for. What measures were taken in these tests to ensure that there was no transducer-introduced effect? Or is it widely accepted that what you generate mathematically will be reflected in the pressure at the hearers eardrum?
It's just that, looking at your waveform, I'm thinking, what could upset the perception of volume in this case? Or the actual volume of the components? The first thing that occurs to me is an assymetric excursion of the driving element. Such as might occur if the signal had a DC offset?
With regard to the miking of the drumkit, I couldn't agree more.
w