1. bfreedma was questioning the article YOU quoted!
2. Why recommend an SACD player if it was off-topic? And, you didn't just recommend an SACD player, you implied any results would be invalid unless a particular brand of SACD player were used. You DID state something about CD vs SACD, that SACD is more "authentic"! You did NOT just tell him to listen and compare himself, you told him (inaccurately) how to compare and the conclusions you've already drawn from your (inaccurate) comparison. In the last post I quoted YOUR OWN WORDS, you cannot dispute what you've already posted and trying to do so is insulting. Your insulting response is EXACTLY as predicted, so your proving my point rather than refuting it!
3. bfreedma was NOT making a claim, he was stating the science/known facts. You are therefore "refusing" the science (on a science forum!) and refusing to apologise for refusing the science. Again, perfectly proving my point!
4. You really don't know why refusing science on a science forum is more insulting/offensive than refusing it on general/non-science based forums?
5. Agreed! Why would those who apparently hate science even come to the science forum in the first place? I believe that those few haters, hate because they're actually ignorant of the science and therefore scared of it, scared that it will: Upset their simplistic view of audio. Prove that they're ignorant. Prove that many/most audiophile products are snake oil and that they've been repeatedly suckered by snake oil salesmen. ... It's very strange for you to say that you're "familiar" with these few haters though, surely you're more than "familiar" as you are one of them!? Maybe it's a "communication issue"?
G
1. He firstly asked about how SACD sounds like and there's nothing wrong in that. I suggested him to try Emm Labs SACD Player and there's nothing wrong in that. His reply about never feel anything different has nothing wrong too. The issue starts from his removed posts and I don't want to bring that back again.
2. You're right. I shouldn't have followed his off-topic comments. I apologize in following his derailed topics. I said authentic because I prefer SACD implementation from Emm Labs over others. It has nothing to do with CD format and I only asked him to compare CD/SACD with Emm Labs, nothing more. Please don't put your fantasies into my words.
3. bfreedma claimed he never felt anything different regardless of the format of the shiny disc, and that's his subjective opinion without any fact or information provided. Did you misread his comment?
4. I refused to agree his subjective opinion about CD and SACD having no audible difference. I don't think that's science since I didn't see any data or information backing up his claim to validate.
5. I fail to understand how you reached that conclusion. This is full of accusations and biases and I hope moderator with do something about your rude and offensive comments. I won't answer this topic.
Please, make a new thread about SACD, not here. I don't want to talk about SACD here.