Edit: Thought I might as well respond to this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by immtbiker
Focused about me? If you say I've insulted your intelligence twice, then it seems like you are making this all about you!
|
Uh, when the first reply to my post was about how I somehow insulted you instead of responding to my argument, yes, it is about
YOU. You focused more on that last question than the argument that I wrote. Anyone who reads it can see it as such. I even said "please" when I wanted you to explain your position. If I had thought you were a dolt, would I ask you to do that?
You escalated this, not me.
[/Edit]
Quote:
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The reason I said "think about it" is because when you seriously think about the price of one stamp costing $.41 when it cost $.32 a short time ago, that is something that can pass through our minds quickly, unless we seriously take the time to think about it.
I don't think I need to "back up" an opinion of something being too expensive for what it's worth when it has gone up 25% in a short period of time, when the price of other commodities, such as computers and cameras have dropped significantly and the value that is encompassed in them has risen quite drastically.
|
Computers and cameras can dropped in costs because the manufacturing materials and capabilities can be done cheaper over time. You can't reduce wages for postal workers neither the rising costs of infrastructure such as fuel.
Quote:
Also, what happened to a $0.01 increase first? Has the post office published facts and figures showing their profitability as a government entity, and who do they answer to when they request a raise? |
The USPS hasn't been part of the government for awhile as the Department of Mail has been abolished although its employees are still Federal. It is a for-profit business.
Quote:
Your history of posts show that you like to stir things up just for the sake of stirring things up. Members of Head-Fi share their opinions on subjects without slandering or attacking others. Please don't go postal on us. |
The irony is strong here!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubel
You do realize that over 50% of the cost of Gasoline is US Taxes? Not all of it is because of Supply and Demand. Do you think there's more demand for cigarettes today? No, there isn't. In August the costs/taxes by the US Government are raising. This isn't about Supply and Demand, it's about taxing.
|
Can you provide a source for me to take a look?
Because when even a halt in production can cause worry in the economy, I doubt it's taxes that is truly the problem.
Quote:
And you haven't mentioned that the tobacco industry has given many farmers and their family's places to live and food to eat from the money they make off farming tobacco. It's not all negative as you say. |
So I suppose if we sanctioned the production of cocaine, it'd be all good since we're providing jobs for cocaine growers right? Fantastic reasoning!
P.S. - I thought you'd stop posting here?