Quote:
Originally Posted by SethSil /img/forum/go_quote.gif
1. apparently a lot of people prefer the bowl pads over the stock "comfys". I will want to try out the bowl pads, in fact, it was one of the intriguing things to me about the 225s. Some say they sound better, but I'm gonna want to try em out, I'm sure. This would increase the price 15-20 dollars.
|
Personally, I like bowl pads because they provide a little bit of extra soundstage. The comfys I don't like because they place the driver too close to the ear resulting in reduced treble and airyness, and muddled congested bass. I use bowl pads taped with electrical tape (increased bass) on my SR-80s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SethSil /img/forum/go_quote.gif
2. The cord seems to be shorter than the 225s, some say unusually short. A cable extender would put me up a few bones. like 10 dollars if I went with radioshack, but im not a big fan.
|
I've always felt the cord was about 1 foot too long with the older non "i" Grados.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SethSil /img/forum/go_quote.gif
3. I have seen written that the MS-1s really need to be amped (while people say the 225s perform really well unamped). I don't know how much I value these opinions, but I would much prefer the versatility of being able to go amp-less and get comparable fidelity.
|
No MS/HF/RS series Grado really
needs to be amped. They sound good from iPod out. But then again, iPod out is actually pretty decent. A good amp for Grados will do the following: extend, tighten, and possibly slightly increase the bass; smooth out the high frequency harshness; and provide more liquid midrange. A mediocre amp will do all of the above but with less transparency and less details. Grados respond less to other headphones from good amping (but it doesn't mean they don't respond well).
Quote:
Originally Posted by SethSil /img/forum/go_quote.gif
4. small things: a lot of people are selling MS-1s compared SR225s, which worries me a little bit. also, MS-1s are supposed to sound better with jazz/etc but I really want to listen to rock, etc. these incremental differences in sound quality are probably least important. but I do value the affection that people here feel for certain headphones, cuz while its totally subjective i think it can also be an indicator of a good pair of cans, and I dont know if people like their MS1s (they're always upgrading, thinking about the MS2s or whatever) like people value their 225s. this seems stupid, i know.
|
This is a problem that many of us have here. I had actually moved away from Grados for a while only to come back. The differences between the Grados are not huge - they have a good reputation for rock (guitars) because of the elevated high midrange and treble. But even the models with toned down treble such as the HF-2 or MS series are still good for rock. You still cannot mistake the HF-2 or the MS-1 for something other than a Grado!
The reason people are selling their MS-1s is that they are entry level models and folks are upgrading to SR-225s, MS-2s or RS-1s. The SR225 bass will extend further down, be a bit tighter, the treble will be smoother (but possibly be more pronounced - it's not an MS), and midrange will be more liquid, and will be much more detailed along with better separation of instruments compared to MS-1.