Ragnar-BY
1000+ Head-Fier
Bugle Boys are nice tubes. I know that many people will not agree on this, but I like them more than Mullard. Amperex 12AU7 is still in “tubey tubes” camp, but feels more vibrant to me.
Hello, expensive but the long plate Mullard with the dual supports square getter have the qualities you are looking for. Also the KenRad with long silvery plates are a great choice, and much cheaper than the Mullard.Hi LanceSaintPaul,
Could you describe the sound signature of these Brimar 13D5 please ?, im just rolled two Tungsram e80cc on a Lampi DAC and did not like them: detailed, resolution, focused, balanced but dryer and almost analytical at least in my system, a lot less musical that the ones that came from factory
Looking for something with more texture, richness and luscious if also we added clean that would be super
These are on my list so far :
Sophia Electric 12AU7
Amperex e80cc
Philips miniwatt e80cc
Genalex Gold Lion ECC82 / B749 / 12AU7
Thank you
Miguel
-- By the way I have Brimar rectifier on the DAC
I really enjoy the black glass tungsol 12AU7, I’ll have to dig around for a W version.Tung-sol 12au7w is one of the best linear sounding with good instrument separation and 3D
what is black glass? im use modern tungsols in my xduoo ta-22 dac/amp. sound is simply phenomenal with combo. tried only rft,tad,telefunken tubes and tungsols way better for them all.I really enjoy the black glass tungsol 12AU7, I’ll have to dig around for a W version.
Nice! I use the old American made tungsol. Black glass is one of the first 12AU7 they made back in the early 1950’s I believe. If you’re ever looking they can still be found online for $50 or so. I’d be happy to send you an old TungSol 12AU7 clear glass , you can listen and give me your impressions. PM me if you’re interested.what is black glass? im use modern tungsols in my xduoo ta-22 dac/amp. sound is simply phenomenal with combo. tried only rft,tad,telefunken tubes and tungsols way better for them all.
no, thanks. as i know vintage tubes mostly made for military or etc equipment and not for music dacs as made modern tubes,wish modern way better doing work on dac and amps i think. i have neutral sounding headphones for listen music what songs artists without defektive bottom,mids or highs frequencies,without changing tibre and tone ,so i like tungsol tubes . tried some other tubes and they has V shaped ,u shaped or simply gain mids. maybe they works for different headphones /amps combos.Nice! I use the old American made tungsol. Black glass is one of the first 12AU7 they made back in the early 1950’s I believe. If you’re ever looking they can still be found online for $50 or so. I’d be happy to send you an old TungSol 12AU7 clear glass , you can listen and give me your impressions. PM me if you’re interested.
In my experience vintage tubes are usually much better sounding then newer production tubes. Of course there are some newer production tubes that sound just as good as vintage tubes (the new production Tung Sol 7581a comes to mind) but they are the exception and not the norm.no, thanks. as i know vintage tubes mostly made for military or etc equipment and not for music dacs as made modern tubes,wish modern way better doing work on dac and amps i think. i have neutral sounding headphones for listen music what songs artists without defektive bottom,mids or highs frequencies,without changing tibre and tone ,so i like tungsol tubes . tried some other tubes and they has V shaped ,u shaped or simply gain mids. maybe they works for different headphones /amps combos.
What @Dawgfish said- also, to add as I just discovered this excellent string- and apologies if this is redundant:In my experience vintage tubes are usually much better sounding then newer production tubes. Of course there are some newer production tubes that sound just as good as vintage tubes (the new production Tung Sol 7581a comes to mind) but they are the exception and not the norm.
I'm not trying to sound like a know at all but I've used mostly tube based equipment for the last 25 years and have literally 1000s of tubes stock piled. Its rare that a newer production tubes will sound better than their vintage counterparts. If you don't want to use vintage tubes due to price and availability I totally get it, but from a pure sound quality perspective you are selling yourself short not trying vintage tubes. Just my two cents.
Great point about tubes being amp or circuit based.What @Dawgfish said- also, to add as I just discovered this excellent string- and apologies if this is redundant:
- Brimar 12AT7/CV455s (1956 Footscray production) are incredible for the money. Langrex in the UK has them for about $100/matched pair plus shipping, and they are an excellent dealer.
- Brimar CV4033s (modified flying lead, 12AU7s I think) units are excellent, more expensive and harder to find. Pulse Tube Store has them at times- I really like the 50s Footscray production versions in that case, too.
- CBS-Hytron NOS JHY-5751s (military issue) are quite good, but more fast/slamming than the Brimars above and more headphone- dependent.
The thing to keep in mind is that tube sound and performance is VERY amp- based, too- so when you can, seek info on the performance in your specific amp.
(Goes off to see if his post is purely redundant…)
I forgot to mention in my earlier post that my last input tube purchase (until something fails) was a matched pair of NOS Mullard 12AX7s (medical-grade/red tips from Grass Valley Instruments) from Brent Jessee Recordings- highly recommend Brent both by reputation and his great help when I reached out to him about “end game” input tubes…East vs West, hahaha. Reading now. Well... yes. I can imagine these 'medical' tubes would perform to a high standard.
im tried telefunken 1960 made and rft 1960 made. new TAD 12au7w is way better sounding,more airy not foggy as vintage. new tungsol way better sounds vs TAD.In my experience vintage tubes are usually much better sounding then newer production tubes. Of course there are some newer production tubes that sound just as good as vintage tubes (the new production Tung Sol 7581a comes to mind) but they are the exception and not the norm.
I'm not trying to sound like a know it all but I've used mostly tube based equipment for the last 25 years and have literally 1000s of tubes stock piled. Its rare that a newer production tube will sound better than their vintage counterparts. If you don't want to use vintage tubes due to price and availability I totally get it, but from a pure sound quality perspective you are selling yourself short not trying vintage tubes. Just my two cents.
I hear you but that is just a small example of vintage tubes. Again in the end if your happy with the new production Tung Sols that's all that counts.im tried telefunken 1960 made and rft 1960 made. new TAD 12au7w is way better sounding,more airy not foggy as vintage. new tungsol way better sounds vs TAD.