TANGZU AUDIO WAN'ER S.G. II

Review Of The TangZu Wan’er S.G. II​

Introduction​

After two and a half years, I’m finally reviewing the successor to the Wan’er S.G. It’s been a long time since I fell in love with the original. Since the release of Tang Zu Wan’er S.G., Tang Zu has been releasing a variety of IEMS, dipping their toes into different realms and experimenting with unique sounds. Since then, I’ve had the pleasure of reviewing Nehza, Fudu Verse, Xuan NV, and Chang Li, and I must say, I’ve fallen in love with all of them as well.

However, when it comes to the Wan’er S.G., first love will always be pure. That’s why I’ve been eagerly anticipating their second version, especially during the period when Zero 2 and CHU II were released. But unfortunately, I could only get my hands on the Wan’er Studio Version.

As soon as I heard that the second version was coming, I couldn’t contain my excitement. Fortunately, I was able to get my hands on the Tang Zu Wan’er S.G. II for review. Before proceeding further, I’d like to clarify a few points.

Disclaimer​

*Since this unit tour was organised by the kindly people at Linsoul, I am grateful to them. As I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as “SG II.”
*I am using different ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the SG II based on its performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.
*Please understand that all opinions expressed in this review are my personal perspective and are not intended to offend anyone’s beliefs or experiences. Therefore, I kindly request a respectful and thoughtful approach to this review, even if it differs from your viewpoint.

Specification​

The SG II houses the same 10mm PET driver, but the drivers have been modified significantly. The main changes are the material used and the driver structure. It’s essentially the same single dynamic driver IEM, but with an improved driver, a better-designed body, and enhanced comfort.

The IEM shells are made of plastic, and the faceplate is crafted from three distinct layers: a faceplate tray, a metal plate, and a resin UV coating. Apart from these components, the IEM boasts a more rounded edge and a smoother feel in the ears, similar to the sensation when holding them in your hands. The shells may feel plumped up, but the fit and comfort are excellent, so I didn’t have any complaints. I could wear them for extended periods, even while sleeping with them twice without any discomfort. The only pain I experienced was around the ear hole, which is a common occurrence.

The two pins are also flat-embedded on the body, so any to-pin cable will likely get stuck.

The best part is that, despite being priced under 20 USD, these IEMs offer both a 3.5mm cable and a 4.4mm cable as options at the same price. However, the Type-C version and the 3.5mm Mic versions are priced at 24 USD and 22 USD, respectively. These IEMs come in two variants: sleek white and timeless black, and their cables are also designed to complement the accent. The two-pin cable terminates to a 4.4mm straight plug. While the cable looks and feels great in your hands, the outer material of the two pins, the Y-split, and the plug’s outer material are made of cheap aluminum, giving it a cheap feel. The cable has a silver accent and is made of 100x0.8mm strands plus 250D silver-plated copper. However, there are only two wires that come together, which splits away above the Y-split, making it feel fragile to me.

Considering the great accessories and termination options they provide, I wouldn’t expect much. Perhaps the black version with a black cable would feel less cheap.

Included with the IEM are three pairs of basic silicon ear tips in three different sizes, as well as three pairs of Tang Sanchai Advanced ear tips in three different sizes.

Coming to the technical specifications, the impedance is 19 Ohms, and the sensitivity is 113.5 dB. The frequency response spans from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, and the total harmonic distortion is less than 0.5%.

Sound​

I’m a true fan of the Wan’er when they were released two and a half years ago. They received a great response, and I consider it the best one a brand can offer if one was looking for a warm and balanced sound compared to its peers at the time. The Moondrop CHU and 7Hz Zero were also released during that period, and people had the best three different tuning options to choose from.

Now, the times have changed. Many brands have released a lot of budget-oriented IEMs, especially around 20 USD, which has saturated the market and confused consumers unless there’s a lot of hype going on. Thinking that TangZu would release a new take on the OG Wan’er and its series had me excited for the release.

TangZu released an updated tuning to match the preferences of the current market and cater to their fans and consumers. The tuning leans towards the same profile as the OG Wan’er, as indicated by its FR graph, but it actually has better extension on both treble and bass ends. The response has shifted towards a more mid-centric presentation, with the midrange being upfront.

I don’t have the OG Wan’er to compare it with, and it’s been a while since I’ve heard it, so I won’t go into depth about how the sound changed. Instead, I’ll comment on the basic alterations made to the sound tuning. This will be a fresh take on how the SG II sounds and how it fits in this price bracket around 20 USD. Let’s delve deeper into the sound to find out more.

Treble​

Compared to the previous trio, the Zero, Chu, and Wan’er, this time around, all three have distinct sound signatures. However, the response is significantly different from their previous versions. The SG II retains the least alteration, and it all begins with the treble region.

The treble region is nicely elevated and has a strong presence, resulting in a smooth and clear sound. While not as vibrant as the Zero 2 and CHU II, it has sufficient details that contribute to a tonally favorable response. The upper treble has enough air and space to bring vocals and instruments forward, making them sound fuller. This response is far superior to the CHU II, which I believe feels more energetic in the lower treble and brings that vibrancy to all elements.

In contrast, the lower treble on the SG II has a less forward projection compared to the CHU 2 and Zero 2. However, the vocals and instruments have a vivid and tonally rich sound that helps maintain a balanced and controlled response. Unlike the Zero 2 and CHU II, it doesn’t expose the treble, which may cause unease, but instead provides a smooth response.

When listening to tracks like Mizukagami no Sekai by Marina Horiuchi, the sound is elegant and clean with good depth in her vocals. This usually becomes tinny and sibilant with other IEMs in this price range. The fuller sound of her vocals and the roundness of the instruments create a musical quality that soothes the mind.

Overall, the treble region presents a smooth, clear, and detailed sound.

Mid Range​

Coming to the midrange, this is where I felt the most significant change in the response compared to its predecessor. The response sounds more lively and direct, whether it’s the vocals or the instruments. Notes sound punch forward, with the vocals shining and the instruments complementing them. The best part is that the tonal balance is great and doesn’t lean towards a lean and dry response.

Compared to CHU II, the SG II lacks the same level of energy. Additionally, it doesn’t sound as spacious as the Zero II. However, in my opinion, the SG II strikes a balance between energy and airiness, resulting in a rich and musical response that leans towards a more harmonious tone. In my opinion, the Zero II sounds very balanced and the CHU II has a V-shaped sound. However, the SG II sounds more mid-centered than balanced. The upper midrange has good emphasis, allowing the vocals to sound fuller and forward, while the instruments sound rich yet clean. The CHU II has a more revealing presence in this regard due to its elevated lower treble, while the Zero II sounds more muted in terms of clarity and presence.

The SG II sounds more pleasing when listening to the vocals, setting a natural and warm presence. The lower midrange is well-presented in the mix, providing enough warmth to keep the upper frequencies with decent, bodied notes without sounding dense. In contrast to the Zero II, the lower midrange in the SG II has less of that dense and thick texture in the vocals and instruments. However, it also has more weight and body compared to the CHU II. The vocals and instruments have a muted sensation, which makes them sound clean but vague, resulting in a subtle nasal sound that is not noticeable unless the listener actively seeks it out.

Listening to Africa by Toto, the track sounds musical and pleasing. The vocals have a great presence and a clean response, while the instruments sound playful and distinct, contributing to the overall musicality and revelation of the song. However, while listening to Sweater Weather by The Neighbourhood, the vocals at high notes sound a bit nasally. This is likely due to the smooth peak at around 2kHz, I think. Despite this, the vocals still sound tonally rich and revealing when separated from the instruments.

In all, the overall presentation of the midrange is forward, pleasant, and musical.

Bass​

The bass is also where some improvement is evident, but I have mixed feelings about it. One thing I vividly remember from the OG Wan’er was that the bass had a nice kick, thump, and slam that was characteristic of how PET diaphragm dynamic drivers produce it. It was very natural and impressed me with its cleanliness and fast attacks. When compared to SG II, the response sounds more controlled, with less of an impact on quantity front than quality. The bass texture and details feels better. However, such a response is not well presented in the mix; it has a more laid-back approach that helps the response sound clean and articulated, but at the same time, it’s less fun.

Compared to the CHU II and the Zero II, the bass is well-balanced and in control. The Zero II has better presence and impact in terms of quantity, while the CHU II has the stronger presence. Not that SG II doesn’t have those qualities, it is well-tamed and mannered in a sense.

The emphasis is still on the sub-bass, but there’s also a good presence of the mid-bass, which radiates warmth to the upper frequencies. The bass feels warmer than before, bringing a clean, rich sound with subtle rumble, thumps, and slams. It doesn’t sound meaty as it does on the Zero II, but it does have smooth consistency when compared to the CHU II. The kicks, drums, and bass guitar have nice individuality to them; the notes produced have distinct sensations and represent how the instruments truly sound. In my opinion, the bass is well-matured and delivers a revealing sound.

Listening to tracks like Frontiers by Awich, the drums at the start of the tracks sound clean and detailed, and when the bass drops, the richness is poured in but feels better resolved. The notes have great impact and sound pounding enough to engage the listener, but the overall sound keeps the bass in check and sounds controlled. Also, listening to tracks like Vicarious by TOOL, the bass line slams nicely with good details and impact. The drums sound well-presented in the mix, emphasizing their presence rather than quantity, which helped the response sound more revealing and dynamic.

Overall, the overall presentation of the bass is well-controlled, warm, and consistent.

Technical Performance​

To be honest, I don’t notice much of a difference when most of the IEMs in this saturated segment sound similar, and I don’t find much to ponder about either. However, when it comes to CHU II, Zero II, and SG II, all three offer distinct technical agility towards the listener. Let’s delve into the details.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

The stage is wide and deep enough to sound spacious, which is slightly better than the CHU II and Zero II. It maintains the alignment of the notes, and they are well-positioned. While the imaging is not as clear or precise as the CHU II, it does have decent clarity. The separation between the notes is well-versed on the Zero II, and the same can be said about the SG II, with good distinction between the notes. I feel that the notes are well-expressed, which helps pinpoint the direction from which the sound is coming.

Speed & Resolution​

The resolution is decent, and the macro details are well-expressed. However, the micro nuances are better revealed by CHU II. The attack and decay of the notes sound natural because they are well-paced, unlike CHU II and Zero II. The resolving aspect of the SG II keeps the presentation clean and organized.

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - While listening to SG II with the WM1A, the response sounds more balanced. The notes have more weight and presence, and the stage has more width. This helps the bass sound better in terms of presence and distinction of the notes. The bass sounds dynamic yet controlled. The midrange sounds a bit tamed but spacious, allowing the vocals and instruments to sound distinctive and separated, creating a stage-like experience. On the other hand, the treble sounds more spacious and airy, making the cymbals sound more prominent and clearer.



FiiO M15S - While listening to SG II with the M15S, the treble response sounds more engaging compared to other sources. The details are more noticeable, and the presentation is clearer and more transparent. The lower treble is more vivid, presenting the vocals and instruments upfront. The midrange sounds lively and upfront, while the bass is laidback with a noticeable improvement in texture and details.



iPod 5.5 Gen (RockBox) - While listening to this pairing of SG II with the iPod 5.5 gen, the response seemed more prominent in the front. It had a more musical quality, with a stronger presence of the vocals and a greater emphasis on the upper midrange, making them sound more revealing and lively. On the other hand, the bass sounded punchier and more prominent in the mix, while the treble sounded laidback.

Tracks​

Ai Higuchi - Akuma no ko
Hana Hope - Destination of the Journey
Marina Horiuchi - Mizukagami no Sekai
majiko - Kokoronashi
Uru - Kamihitoe
Anly - Sukinishinayo
LONGMAN - spiral
Kohana Lam - a few sentimental
RADWIMPS - The Great Escape
milet - Anywhere Anytime
Arika - Cigarette
Arika - blan_
The Sixth Lie - Shadow is the Light
Hiroyuki Sawano - 4eVR
Saiki - Tactics
Honoka Takahashi - LiLas
Creepy Nuts - Nidone
Beat Crusaders - woh i nee
Awich - Frontier
Rokudenashi - Eureka
Indila - Love Story
Rammstein - Sonne
Cutting Crew - I just Died in Your Arms Tonight
The Police - Every Breath You Take
Fleetwood Mac - Gypsy
Tom Petty - Free Fallin’
U2 - With or Without You
The La’s - There She Goes
Oasis - Wonderwall
Toto - Africa
Bobby McFerrin - Don’t Worry, Be Happy
Zeal & Ardor - Kilonova
Zeal & Ardor - are you the only one
TOOL - Vicarious
Thy Art Is Murder - Keres
Lady Gaga - Just Dance
Lady Gaga - Poker Face
Jay-Z - Run this town
Kanye West - Stronger
AURORA - Black Water Lilies
AURORA - The Seed (LIve from the Royal Albert Hall)
AURORA - Runaway
Skrillex - MOSQUITOTOUILLE
Skrillex - MORJA KAIJU
Skrillex - Recovery
The Toxic Avenger - Aside From You
Zeds Dead - RSIH
Shangai Doom - Viridian
Dion Timmer - The Best Of Me

Conclusion​

To conclude this review, I believe these are a decent pair of IEMs. Compared to the OG Wan’er S.G., they sound fresh and new. In terms of clarity and details, as well as technical aspects, they have been significantly improved and compete well with their peers like the Zero II and CHU II. I think TangZu made the right decision by retaining the same driver and improving upon it. Otherwise, brands would likely change their sound signature, and I believe this new product should be called something else rather than claiming these a successor. I highly recommend these IEMs, especially considering the accessories you get at this price point.

TANGZU Wan'er S.G II
10mm Dynamic Driver PET Diaphragm Universal IEM
Redcarmoose Labs, April 29th, 2025

10mm Dynamic Driver, Remarkable Performance
Upgraded Driver Chamber for Fine Tuning
Durable & Reliable 0.78mm 2-Pin 5N Oxygen-Free High-Purity Cable
3.5mm/4.4mm/Type-C with MIC Options
Ergonomic Shape, Exceptional Comfort

The elephant in the room:

Also note the way high treble is debatable, even if it measured well on all tested IEMs anyways. Also even if there is a truth to the above 15kHz graph, it is of little consequence due to holding less energy/volume in relation to the Pinna Gain region, thus lesser noticeability in listening.

Left to right: TANGZU Wan'er S.G and TANGZU Wan'er S.G II

Review summery:
So the shape of these two IEMs is way different. To the point that the original has longer nozzles. Now my first impressions were that the II has better timbre, and upon closer examination (on another day) it is really the Timbre that they have gone ahead and changed. Actually the II sounds a tad darker, but most of all things like the timbre of vocals and guitar seem more realistic now, even if it does not show on the graph. Should you get the II if you already have the original? Not sure, it really depends if you like the timbre of the original, Plus now we get a departure from the qdc style 2Pins (into regular 2PIN connections) and a great new cable as well as the SANCAI ear-tips! The facts are that with this new shell design I actually need longer ear-tips to get fitment.........so the included L SANCAI ear-tips were of no use, but I can use them elsewhere. But this new II shell is going and added a chunky feel, maybe the extra interior volume adds the timbre improvements?



TANGZU:
I love the TANGZU ZETIAN WU Planar IEM!
That’s right, probably my 2nd favorite Planar IEM out of all Planar IEMs in my possession. Now at first that single fact may not resonate upon reading it. The 2nd best from all the Planar IEMs I have heard since 2022……….that’s a long time in IEM years! That means as time goes by I get new Planar IEM additions and reviews written about them. While the ZETIAN WU isn’t the most analytical it is definitely musical.



To make a long story short there is also a version of the ZETIAN WU where they tuned the frequency response to provide a slightly more even (not so V shaped) character. So simply taking off a little from the treble and a little from the bass possibly offers more view into the midrange, I don’t know I haven’t heard it.

At $199.00 the “Heyday’ is a slightly different tune of the original ZETIAN WU Planar IEM.
https://www.linsoul.com/products/tangzu-x-hbb-wu-heyday


Cable:
This new cable comes with a choice of microphone or not, plus a choice of 3.5mm and 4.4mm. The ergonomics of the cable are great, it is like a mini SIMGOT AUDIO LC7, only it doesn’t have the modular plugs.

Ear tips:
TANGZU SANCAI ear-tips in three sizes.

Package:

Build:
It goes without saying the size increase has lead to better feel, though the nozzles start to be on the boarder of small. The added regular 2Pin is an improvement over the qdc style 2Pin plugs. Where here you have to turn the IEMs slightly to be able to find the perfect place, but after that they stay locked in, and I like that! Note the vents off the back, also they decided to not put the nozzle vent like the original Wan'er S.G, as shown in the pictures here, if you look closely at the nozzles in the above comparison picture.



Sound:
Bass:
The bass shows itself careful and piratical. I say practical because there are other IEMs which don’t go ahead and offer a complete balance. This lack of ability can show itself especially with the bass ambient genre, leaving enough out to make the music boring. But not with the Wan'er S.G II, as it provides a clean and satisfying idea of bass tones, not to mention the timbre of bass is really good! With regular Rock the bass finds its groove and swagger seemingly (while not the thickest or deepest) enough to move the songs along and be viewed as a style of clarity in response.

Midrange:
Really midrange is what the Wan'er S.G II is all about. And to be fair, the midrange is where 80% - 90% of the musical information is. That the money here is that the Wan'er S.G II offers a relatively large idea of imaging and a filled-out midrange presentation.

Treble:
Enough detail and itemization to where there is just the right amount of treble, that while we don’t have the separation of treble image father out into the stage of a hybrid IEM, we do have a nice smooth quality to the found trebles.

Technicalities:
Timbre and note-weight:
Here we are 80% into a natural found timbre. That depending on music can move up to the 90% success rate. Here especially vocals do really well. That while sure more expensive IEMs promote s denser idea of note-weight, for the money spent we are riding high of the hog.

Stage:
It is the stage that makes all of this work, that the size of music is what makes the Wan'er S.G II tick.

Pace:
Great pace, as if anything I have learned about the Wan'er S.G II, is its ability to do quality pace is one of the single greatest aspects of our signature!

Music:

Timestamps only pertain to digital file, not video.
Suldusk
Anthesis
Sphaera
96kHz - 24bit
Probably this is the very best example of how the musicality takes over with a dash of great technicalities. The technicalities come with a more midrange tune, presenting well positioned guitars and prominent vocals. As such we find the bass just right for music like this, kept in place……yet still heard fast and careful. Though I have to say other songs on the album hold a dash of the original off timbre, meaning sure they somehow reduced the off timbre with bigger shells, but there is always a chance of the timbre tone rearing its head…depending of file chosen. Lucky though it is not always noticeable. This timbre can be slowly gotten used to, as the more you listen the more it starts to sound natural.

Probably the single best part of this experience is that vocals are in the perfect place…….soaring out front, that and they comber with great timbre, natural vocal timbre.That there is a full and detailed style to the vocals that have you never wanting more, or questioning the vocal ability, and I like that!


Gdanian
Induction
Shield Emitter (feat. Tineidae)
44.1 kHz - 24 bit
Timestamps only pertain to digital file, not video.
Probably it is the completeness that is rewarding here. Meaning at this price point you would guess TANGZU would be forgiven for leaving a section of the ability out, of simply not including it? Yet upon hearing this song the bass while reserved, its still holding emotion and deepness, only shown that much better from the living area inside the stage. Really this song hold the same technicalities as the song to follow, that when there is extra bass sonics I the song, the TANGZU Wan'er S.G II is up to the task!


Lorne Balfe and Andrew Kawczynski
Grand Turismo OST
Academy Race
44.1 kHz - 24 bit
Timestamps only pertain to digital file, not video.
Here for $20.00 we are truly enjoying life. If you were to take the Wan'er S.G II to a show and play this file with the IEMs in an unsuspecting ears…a smile would follow. It is just a lot of sound for the money. Probably the fact that this actual file add a deep impactful bass, a bass that comes on strong and yet perfectly positioned holding the transient qualities and texture. It is the reserved texture that holds the window into the detail found. Especially the sub-bass at 00:10, it is so cool! Tat the extra sonic additives at 00:18 show a good stage and separation. And again the sub-bass at 00:22 are the cats meow! I would enjoy this song alway with just what the Wan'er S.G II does, and enjoy it with multiple listens, always in fascination at just how the Wan'er S.G II seems to get this whole number down? No worries of off timbre, just a solid tone and texture from what a 10mm DD does best.



Conclusion:
The Wan'er S.G II takes noticeability being TANGZU placed the old original 10mm driver in a new case. I’m just guessing here but this is what I think. There was no need to redesign a new driver, only repackage it inside of a new structure, enabling the extra bass and lower midrange resonance to subtly add on and double-up frequencies to deliver the timbre goods. The while the original was great, here we are finding a tad more meat on the bone, adding note density and polishing the original tone into better listenability. This extra is more than the graph would have you believe, and could be of value if you loved the original Wan'er S.G and wanted new 2Pins as well as a slightly smoother and more filled out tone from a new IEM resonance chamber.

$20.00
https://www.linsoul.com/products/tangzu-waner-s-g-ii

Linsoul website: https://www.linsoul.com/
Linsoul Aliexpress Store: https://ddaudio.aliexpress.com/store/2894006
Linsoul USA Amazon Store link: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=merchant-items&me=A267P2DT104U3C

Disclaimer:
I want to thank Kaitlyn of Linsoul for the love and the TANGZU Wan'er S.G II Universal IEM review sample.

Disclaimer:
These are one persons ideas and concepts, your results may vary.

Equipment Used:
Sony WM1Z Walkman DAP MrWalkman Firmware 4.4mm and 3.5mm
Sony WM1A Walkman DAP MrWalkman Firmware 4.4mm and 3.5mm
Sony TA-ZH1ES DAC/AMP Firmware 1.03
Electra Glide Audio Reference Glide-Reference Standard "Fatboy" Power Cord
Sony Walkman Cradle BCR-NWH10
AudioQuest Carbon USB
UA3 Dongle DAC/Amplifier 4.4mm

========================================================================
Disclaimer:

• I don’t read FR graphs. I only use my ears, as earphones should be used.
• Linsoul sent this unit to me in an exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will do its best to devoid from any bias/es as much as possible.
• The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
• No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review.
• Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.

Burn-in time: 4-8 hours per day, 5 days.

Source/s used:

• - Non-HiFi smartphone (Infinix Note 12 G96), PC.
• - Tanchjim Space DAC
• - Fosi Audio SK02 USB DAC
• - Venture Electronics Odo USB DAC
• - Venture Electronics Devastator USB DAC
• - Venture Electronics Megatron USB DAC
• - Snowsky Echo Mini DAP
• - Kiwi Ears Allegro Mini DAC
• - DDHiFi TC35M2 USB DAC
• - Aiwa XP-V710C CD Player (12 sec. EASS)
• - FiiO DM13 CD Player
• - Local Files via Foobar, YouTube Music, Deezer, and Qobuz with UAPP.

IEM/Earbud/Setup configuration: Stock small black eartips, any form of EQ or MSEB off, 40-60% volume.

========================================================================
Sound signature:

• The TangZu Wan’er S.G second generation is a hybrid of the previous Wan’er SG and Wan’er SE, in terms of its overall sound. It exhibits the thick, warm characteristics of the S.G, while keeping the presence of the mids and its upper frequencies nearly neutral, like the Wan’er SE has. In a nutshell, the 2nd generation of the Wan’er S.G. is a relatively neutral sounding IEM with a bit of obvious bass boost, as seen on recent IEMs existing today.

Lows:

• For those people who prefer a chunky, rumbly subbass while keeping the other frequencies unaffected, the Wan’er 2nd Gen is for you. I am honestly surprised that it managed to keep the overall bass response deep and meaty, while keeping the other frequencies prim and proper. Subbass is a bit more dominant than midbass, with an average attack and decay. Detail and texture on this region is decent and well-done, but nothing hyperbolical to write about. This isn’t a bad thing either since this is by far one of the better sets in this region I have reviewed and encountered under 25 USD.

Mids:

• Overall, the mids are clean, vivid, yet forgiving to any flaws, which is a good thing since this means that a lot of people can enjoy their vocals and instruments in detail for its price, while keeping a good amount of warmth and neatness for its price. Lower mids exhibit a mild warmth to it, adding a subtle thickness to the male vocals and instruments in the region. Upper mids do not seem to elevate in presence in my opinion, but it definitely is clear and never sounded boxy or drowned to my ears. Female vocals and instruments in this region still exhibit a good amount of clarity, air, and sparkle. Peaks and unnatural harshness are also absent in this set, which means that this can be safely recommended for everyone, even for those people that are a bit more sensitive to extra or boosted upper frequencies.

Treble:

• It is noticeable here on the treble on the Wan’er 2nd gen that it managed to incorporate both characteristics of the Wan’er SG and SE, as it is non-fatiguing, and a bit relaxed, while keeping the details and extension well-put. Just like its upper mids, there aren’t any unnatural peaks or harshness in this region. Detail retrieval is average most of the time, exhibiting most of the details and nuances present on the track.

Soundstage, Imaging and Separation:

• The Wan’er 2nd gen, just like its other older siblings, exhibits a solid technical performance for its asking price. It is one of the better sets I have heard and reviewed personally in this regard, but nothing out of ordinary that I observed. The soundstage is wider than taller, with a good amount of depth. Separation and layering is decent at best, and may suffer a bit on very heavy passages. Imaging is accurate and has no problems rendering vocal and instrument positions.

========================================================================
Other IEM Comparisons!

Tanchjim Bunny (20+ USD)

• Between the two sets, the Tanchjim Bunny is the more “neutral” pair when compared to the Waner 2nd Gen, as it has lesser bass quantity and a slightly forward mids. In return, the Bunny is also thinner in body when compared to the Wan’er 2nd Gen. Technical performance is more or less the same.

ND Planet (15 USD)

• The ND Planet is noticeably warmer, safer, v-shaped in sound when compared to the Wan’er 2nd Gen. It is also thicker in body, at the cost of its overall decay and details. The transients and texture seems to be smoothened out when compared. Technical performance is better on the Wan’er 2nd Gen.

KZ Castor (Harman Edition) (15 USD)

• I still cannot believe that the KZ Castor Harman is still relevant today despite Chi-Fi's aggressive, saturated marketing. Between the two sets, the Wan’er 2nd Gen is still the better set due to its cleaner, detailed sound, but the Castor Harman isn’t that far on a normal, consumer standpoint.

========================================================================
Pros:

• A Wanér S.G. + SE Hybrid!
• ”Neutral” with a subbass boost sound signature!
• Subbass dominant, chunky, firm bass response!
• Clear, mildly warm mids!
• Non-fatiguing yet well-extended upper frequencies under 20 USD!
• Above average technical performance for its price!
• Very good visual design!
• Excellent inclusions for its asking price in terms of quality!
• Finally, a “normal” 2-pin connection!
• Easy to drive!

Cons:

• IEM nozzles are a bit shorter than the previous Wanér IEMs.
• IEM shell is a bit “bigger” than the previous Wanér IEMs.
• Cable earhooks is a bit stubborn to my ears, affecting the overall fit, comfort, and isolation (highly subjective, I had the earhooks on my unit removed instead)
• Visually-pleasing cleaning cloth is now absent in this set (not really a big deal)
• A case or a pouch for this IEM would be a good treat for everybody.

========================================================================
I’d like to commend TangZu for continuously refining the Wan’er lineup, particularly the Wan’er 2nd Generation. Its overall sound quality and character, in my opinion, is nearly flawless and can definitely cater to a wide variety of use case scenarios, genres, and ears, while keeping any compromises for its asking price to the minimum. They nailed it so much that I can’t pinpoint any serious flaws, but mostly personal nitpicks. Overall, I can wholeheartedly recommend the TangZu Wan’er S.G. 2nd generation to basically everybody, who prefers a warm, yet neutral and decently detailed sound for its asking price. This a solid comeback for the Wan’er lineup, TangZu!

========================================================================
Pairing recommendations:

• Source: I was sent with a 4.4mm variant, which in my opinion the Wan’er 2nd gen do not need, as it can be easily driven across on all of my sources and devices, even when plugged straight in a phone. For optimal results, pair the TangZu Wane’r 2nd Gen with a 2Vrms dongle, preferably neutral, or warm sources.
• Eartips: It is always a nice treat that the TangZu includes their signature Tang Sancai eartips. I have no problems pairing the Tang Sancai with this IEM. You may still use your preferred eartips.
• Cable: The cable is well and beautifully built. However, the molded earhooks are quite stubborn to my ears and affect the overall fit, comfort, and isolation, along with the sound, to my ears at least. Not fitting this properly in my ears resulted in a bassy, v-shaped sound signature, which is why I removed the earhooks by myself and restarted my reviewing phase with this IEM again. I do not promote removing the earhooks as this voids the warranty, but if it does not fit you well, you may want to change the cable to your liking.

Thank you for reading!

Non-affiliated links here:

https://www.linsoul.com/products/tangzu-waner-s-g-ii

Additional Photos Here:

Tangzu is no stranger to making budget-friendly IEMs that punch above their weight, and with the release of the Wan’er 2, they’ve decided to give their much-loved entry-level model a well-earned sequel. Now, sequels in audio can be hit-or-miss—some improve, some stray too far—but the Wan’er 2? It genuinely feels like a matured, polished continuation of the original, and then some.

Whats in the Box? here is my quick unboxing video of the Tangzu Waner 2:

Build & Accessories: Familiar, but Better
The Wan’er 2 shares the same design and build as the original Wan’er SG—those familiar plastic shells, comfortable ergonomic fit, and that lightweight, forget-you’re-wearing-it feel. The faceplate has a sleek look, though nothing too flashy. This time around, Tangzu includes three pairs of the Tang Sancai standard bore tips, which are quite popular among budget IEM lovers for a reason—they fit well, seal better than average and on some cases can help if your IEM have some driver flex, and most importantly, they don’t mess with the tuning.

Another notable upgrade: the stock cable. It’s now more pliable, has a cleaner aesthetic, and my unit came terminated with a 4.4mm balanced jack, which is a welcome change for those of us living in balanced-output ecosystems. It’s not boutique-tier but it’s miles better than the old stock cable that shipped with the OG Wan’er.

Sound Impressions
Tested using the included Tang Sancai medium tips and various sources, the Wan’er 2 surprised me with its level of refinement. Both channels are perfectly balanced, and it’s one of those rare occasions where the graph really does tell the sonic story—smooth, mature, and tastefully tuned.

Bass:
The bass on the Wan’er 2 has grown up. Compared to the OG’s more fun and boosted low end, this new version dials things back a bit. The sub-bass is clean, with less rumble and a more neutral presence. The midbass is punchy and tight, with a slight roll-off that keeps things from getting too warm or muddy.
Don’t expect head-rattling slam or excessive texture down low—this is a disciplined, refined bass presentation. It’s not dry or dull, just more polite and controlled. Great for those who appreciate accuracy over fun, though bassheads may feel it’s a touch too polite.

Midrange:
The midrange is exceptionally well-tuned, with a natural tone and timbre that make both male and female vocals sound rich and realistic. There's a lush, organic quality to vocals that gives the Wan’er 2 an emotional, inviting character.
The upper mids are slightly more forward than the OG, which adds clarity and presence, especially for female vocals and acoustic instruments. However, there’s a gentle roll-off toward the lower treble, which softens the edge and adds a bit of warmth. It’s a nice balance—forward enough to be engaging, but never shouty or harsh.

Treble:
Treble here leans toward the laid-back side, which will be a blessing for treble-sensitive listeners. It’s clean and non-sibilant, with a decent amount of detail retrieval but not overly airy or sparkly. There’s just enough extension to keep things from sounding dull or veiled, but detail lovers might crave a bit more crispness.
This is a “sit back and enjoy” kind of treble—not one that throws every microdetail in your face, but one that lets the music flow smoothly without fatigue.

Soundstage & Imaging: Adequate and Competent
The soundstage is about average—not wide or deep enough to make you think you’re in a concert hall, but also not so narrow that it feels congested. It’s... just enough. What impressed me more was the imaging, which is actually quite precise for the price. Instruments are easy to locate, and there's a clear sense of left, right, and center.
Separation is okay—not bad, not spectacular. In complex passages, things can feel a little less defined, but for most genres and daily listening, it's entirely serviceable.

Comparisons

vs Kefine Delci
Both the Wan’er 2 and Kefine Delci sit in the ultra-competitive budget IEM space, and both are shockingly competent for their price—but they approach sound from different philosophies.
Tuning & Tonal Balance
• Wan’er 2 leans toward a neutral-warm Harman-inspired signature, with an emphasis on natural vocals, smooth mids, and a relaxed treble.
• Delci, on the other hand, brings in a mild V-shaped tuning, with a bit more bass punch and upper-mid energy, making it more lively and forward in presentation.

• Wan’er 2: smoother, warmer, more refined and natural
• Delci: punchier, more dynamic, with brighter energy and contrast
Bass
• The Delci has a slightly more pronounced and punchier midbass, giving it more impact and fun for genres like pop and hip-hop.
• The Wan’er 2 takes a more controlled and subtle approach, with tight subbass and rolled-off midbass, better for acoustic, vocals, or jazz where bass restraint is appreciated.

• Delci: more fun, engaging, with slightly better slam
• Wan’er 2: more refined, controlled, and less intrusive
Midrange
• The Wan’er 2 excels here with its natural tone and timbre. Vocals—especially male and female alike—sound lush, organic, and emotionally engaging.
• The Delci’s mids are also solid, but slightly more recessed in the lower mids compared to the Wan’er 2. Female vocals can be a bit more forward due to the Delci’s brighter upper midrange.

• Wan’er 2: better balance, fuller, more relaxed vocals
• Delci: slightly thinner, brighter mids with more vocal clarity but less warmth
Treble
• The Delci has more sparkle, especially in the lower treble—it feels more open, slightly airier, and has more perceived detail.
• The Wan’er 2 is more laid-back, smoother in the treble, and non-fatiguing, but trades off some clarity and microdetail.

• Delci: brighter and more open, might get hot at times
• Wan’er 2: smooth and safe, great for long listening
Technical Performance
• Imaging & Separation: Delci edges ahead slightly with more precise instrument placement and slightly sharper separation.
• Soundstage: Both are average, but Delci feels a touch wider due to its more energetic top-end.
• Detail Retrieval: Delci comes across as crisper, but Wan’er 2 handles timbre and realism better.

Which One Should You Pick?
• Go Wan’er 2 if you prefer natural mids, smooth treble, and non-fatiguing tuning—perfect for vocals, acoustic, indie, jazz, or just long relaxing sessions.
• Pick Delci if you enjoy a more dynamic, energetic sound, with more bass punch, brighter upper mids, and more sparkle—great for pop, EDM, rock, or anyone who likes their music with a bit more “bite.”

vs Tripowin Vivace

• Vivace, by contrast, leans into a fun-first tuning, with a bold V-shape, strong bass, and lively upper mids and treble. It’s unapologetically colored.
• Wan’er 2: Relaxed and musical, tuned for natural vocals and long-term listening
• Vivace: Energetic and punchy, tuned for excitement and contrast

Bass
• Vivace throws in big bass energy, especially in the subbass. It rumbles deep, slams hard, and unapologetically colors the sound.
• Wan’er 2 has a more restrained, controlled bass, with tighter subbass and less midbass bloom. It’s cleaner and more neutral down low.

• Vivace: big, fun bass with strong impact—basshead-approved
• Wan’er 2: tight and refined—better for balance and genre versatility
Midrange
• Wan’er 2’s mids are the highlight—natural tone, slightly warm, with good weight and excellent timbre. Vocals are front and center, lush and easy on the ears.
• Vivace’s mids are recessed, especially male vocals which can sound a little thin or veiled compared to the punchy bass and forward upper

mids.
• Wan’er 2: better mids, richer vocal presentation, more natural
• Vivace: more scooped mids, especially for male vocals

Upper Mids & Treble
• Vivace is brighter and more sparkly, with an elevated upper midrange that gives energy and bite to vocals and instruments. But it can be peaky and fatiguing at times, especially with female vocals or sibilant tracks.
• Wan’er 2 plays it safer—smoother and more relaxed in the upper mids and lower treble, but at the expense of microdetail and air.
• Vivace: energetic and detailed, but may get harsh at high volumes
• Wan’er 2: smooth and laid-back, better for treble-sensitive listeners
Technical Performance
• Detail Retrieval: Vivace reveals more microdetail and edge due to its treble lift, but Wan’er 2 handles macro detail and realism better.
• Imaging & Separation: Slight edge to Vivace due to the extra treble clarity, but Wan’er 2 keeps up with cleaner midrange layering.
• Soundstage: Both are average, but Vivace feels wider due to its brighter presentation.

• Vivace: feels technically sharper but also more artificial
• Wan’er 2: more coherent and organic

Build, Fit & Accessories
• Both are lightweight and comfortable, but the Wan’er 2 wins with the Tang Sancai tips and a better cable, especially with the 4.4mm option.
• Vivace looks flashier, but some may find the fit less secure due to its shape and nozzle angle.
Which One Should You Pick?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you want something mature, balanced, and natural-sounding with rich mids and no harsh edges. Great for vocals, acoustic, lo-fi, jazz, and chillout music.
• Go with the Vivace if you want a bass-heavy, bright, and lively IEM for EDM, hip-hop, pop, or rock—something that wakes you up rather than soothes you.



vs Kefine Klean
Think of the Wan’er 2 as the smooth-talking charmer — warm, organic, and easy to listen to.
The Kefine Klean, on the other hand, is the clean-cut professional — more refined, balanced, and articulate, like a grown-up version of the Delci with polished shoes and a crisper accent.

Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 is tuned for warmth and musicality. It has a relaxed, slightly colored presentation that leans into smoothness rather than precision.
• Klean leans closer to a neutral-ish U-shape with tighter bass, lush mids, and a better-controlled treble. There’s more clarity and balance without sacrificing musicality.
• Wan’er 2: Warm, mellow, emotional
• Klean: Balanced, clean, more technical but still engaging

Bass
• Wan’er 2 bass is pleasant, moderately elevated but not particularly fast or textured. Subbass is cleaner than OG Wan’er, but overall it's more about presence than definition.
• Klean bass is tighter, punchier, and faster-decaying. Subbass has a more focused presence, and midbass is better controlled — overall, it's more articulate and “grown-up” sounding.

• Wan’er 2: Smooth, slightly rounded, less detailed
• Klean: Punchy, textured, well-separated

Midrange
• Wan’er 2 mids are its sweet spot — vocals come across as lush, organic, and weighty. Instruments sound natural but not ultra-detailed.
• Klean mids are cleaner, slightly more forward, and better separated. Vocals are vivid with excellent tonality, especially with the black nozzle which brings more air and crispness. It’s less warm than Wan’er 2 but more precise.

• Wan’er 2: Warm, intimate, forgiving
• Klean: Clear, well-separated, slightly brighter

Treble
• Wan’er 2 treble is laid-back and inoffensive. It avoids sibilance and harshness but lacks air and sparkle.
• Klean treble is better extended, more open-sounding, and has a gentle crispness that gives music more life and detail. Still smooth, but more present.

• Wan’er 2: Safe, non-fatiguing
• Klean: Smooth, but clearer and more revealing

Technical Performance
• Detail retrieval: Klean edges ahead, especially in micro-details and clarity.
• Soundstage: Both have average width, but Klean has slightly better depth and separation.
• Imaging & separation: Klean is more precise and cleaner, making it easier to track instruments in complex tracks.
• Dynamics: Klean is punchier and livelier; Wan’er 2 is softer and more laid-back.
Build, Fit & Accessories
• Wan’er 2 is lightweight and ergonomic. Its updated cable (especially in 4.4mm) and Tang Sancai tips are solid.
• Klean feels more premium with its metallic housing and sleeker design. Fit is just as comfy, and interchangeable nozzles (silver and black) give you mild tuning flexibility.
Which Should You Get?
• Go for Wan’er 2 if you want a cozy, warm, and relaxed IEM for chill listening — especially if you’re treble-sensitive or just want something easy and musical.
• Pick Klean if you want a more refined, technically capable, and balanced listen with better clarity and control — a great all-rounder that still feels enjoyable and not clinical.

The Wan’er 2 plays it safe but does it well — smooth, pleasing, and instantly likable.
The Kefine Klean steps it up with more polish, control, and resolution, making it the better option if you want something that can scale with higher-quality sources and more detailed music.



vs EPZ Q1 Pro
This is a bit like comparing a mellow jazz singer (Wan’er 2) with a high-energy pop vocalist (Q1 Pro).
Both are enjoyable and crowd-pleasing, but the Wan’er 2 goes for a smoother, more organic presentation, while the Q1 Pro is all about energy, clarity, and a more forward sound.
Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 is warm and mature, with a slightly relaxed tuning that emphasizes lush mids and smoothness across the board.
• Q1 Pro leans more into a modern Harman-esque tuning, with lifted upper mids and treble for added energy and sparkle. It’s the more vibrant-sounding IEM.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Warm, soft-edged, musical
• Q1 Pro: Clean, energetic, crisp
Bass
• Wan’er 2 has a tighter, more refined bass compared to the OG Wan’er. Subbass is clean, but there's not a lot of rumble. Midbass is punchy, slightly rolled-off, and doesn’t overwhelm.
• Q1 Pro’s bass is snappier and more elevated, especially in the subbass. It has better slam and a slightly more exciting low-end, though it can sometimes overshadow the mids if you’re sensitive to that lift.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Refined, less aggressive
• Q1 Pro: More impact, slightly boomier
Midrange
• Wan’er 2’s mids are lush, warm, and natural-sounding. Vocals — especially male — have a nice body and weight. Female vocals are smooth but not super forward.
• Q1 Pro’s mids are more forward and energetic, especially in the upper mids. Female vocals sound brighter and clearer, but there’s less warmth and body than the Wan’er 2. It’s cleaner but more prone to sharpness in shouty recordings.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Smooth, laid-back mids
• Q1 Pro: Clearer, more energetic, a bit leaner
Treble
• Wan’er 2 treble is laid-back, non-fatiguing, and forgiving. It doesn’t sparkle much, but it avoids harshness and sibilance.
• Q1 Pro’s treble is more pronounced — brighter, crisper, and better for detail retrieval. It can be more exciting, but also slightly fatiguing on longer sessions for treble-sensitive folks.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Soft, polite, gentle
• Q1 Pro: Brighter, more detailed, slightly aggressive
Technical Performance
• Detail retrieval: Q1 Pro has the upper hand — it brings out more texture and micro-details, particularly in the treble region.
• Soundstage: Both are fairly average, but the Q1 Pro feels slightly wider due to the brighter tuning and airier top end.
• Imaging & separation: Q1 Pro again edges ahead here — it’s easier to track instruments in complex tracks. Wan’er 2 is more blended and rounded, which some may actually prefer for casual listening.
• Dynamics: Q1 Pro sounds more lively and dynamic. Wan’er 2 is smoother but can come off a bit soft by comparison.
Build, Fit & Accessories
• Wan’er 2 keeps the same great ergonomic shell as the original, and now includes better tips (Tangzu’s Sancai tips) and an improved stock cable — especially if you got the 4.4 version.
• Q1 Pro has a more solid-feeling metal shell, a good-quality cable, and a decent set of tips. Its build feels more premium, but the fit may be a bit chunky for smaller ears.
Which Should You Get?
• Go for Wan’er 2 if you value smooth, organic mids, a laid-back presentation, and forgiving treble. It’s great for longer listening sessions, vocal music, and those sensitive to upper-mid sharpness.
• Pick Q1 Pro if you want energy, detail, and punch — a livelier, more dynamic IEM that works great for modern pop, EDM, and tracks where sparkle and speed matter.

The Wan’er 2 is the safer, more mature-tuned option. The Q1 Pro is sharper, more exciting, and technically a step ahead — but it demands a bit more tolerance for brightness and upper-mid energy.
If the Wan’er 2 is like sipping hot tea on a rainy afternoon, the Q1 Pro is more like an iced coffee shot before a workout. It just depends on what kind of energy you’re in the mood for.

vs Simgot EA500
These two IEMs may live in the same sub-$100 category, but the EA500 often punches above its class with bold energy and clarity, while the Wan’er 2 takes the more mature, easygoing route.

Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 follows a smoother, warmer Harman-inspired curve. It’s tuned to please — warm mids, relaxed treble, nothing offensive.
• EA500 comes with two nozzle tunings (red and black), both of which are much more energetic and revealing, with a clear focus on upper mids and treble clarity.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Smooth, warm, and easy to love
• EA500: Bright, vivid, and exciting — more “hi-fi” sounding
Bass
• EA500 bass is fast, clean, and responsive — not the most elevated, but it slams when needed with great control and texture, especially in the subbass.
• Wan’er 2 bass is more relaxed — still punchy and present, but more rounded and soft around the edges. There’s less texture and definition, though it’s pleasing for casual listening.

• EA500: Tight, technical, more dynamic
• Wan’er 2: Gentle, smooth, less detailed
Midrange
• Wan’er 2 midrange is arguably its strongest suit — vocals are natural, lush, and organic. There's warmth and emotional engagement here, even if not the most detailed.
• EA500 mids are more neutral and analytical — excellent detail retrieval, especially with female vocals, but also sharper and more forward, which may come off as shouty or hot to sensitive ears (especially with the red nozzle).

• Wan’er 2: Warm, smooth, relaxed mids
• EA500: Detailed, forward, more analytical mids
Treble
• EA500’s treble is lively and sparkly, with plenty of air and microdetails. It's where the EA500 pulls ahead of many sub-$100 IEMs — but it can also veer into fatiguing territory, especially at higher volumes or with brighter tracks.
• Wan’er 2’s treble is mellow, smooth, and free of harshness. It's easy to listen to but also a little rolled off — you’re getting comfort over detail.

• EA500: Crisp, airy, and revealing
• Wan’er 2: Relaxed and non-fatiguing, but less detailed
Technicalities
• Detail retrieval: EA500 takes this easily. Every pluck, reverb, or vocal nuance is more clearly rendered.
• Imaging & separation: EA500 is more precise, with sharper imaging and better instrument layering.
• Soundstage: EA500 feels wider and more open. Wan’er 2 is more intimate, “closer-in,” but not congested.
• Dynamics: EA500 sounds more alive and dynamic; Wan’er 2 is smoother, less punchy.
Build & Fit
• EA500’s metal shells feel solid and premium but can be a bit heavier. The mirror finish is pretty but a fingerprint magnet.
• Wan’er 2’s resin shells are lightweight and comfy with no sharp edges. Not as flashy, but ergonomics win here.
Stock accessories also favor the Wan’er 2, thanks to the Tangzu Sancai tips and upgraded cable (especially if you got the 4.4mm version). EA500’s stock cable is basic and tips may need replacing.
Which One’s Right for You?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you want a more natural, chill, and warm sound that works well for long listening sessions — especially if you’re treble-sensitive.
• Go for the EA500 if you want a more energetic, detailed, and technically strong IEM — something closer to a mini reference tuning, especially with the red nozzle

Final Thoughts
The Wan’er 2 is like a cozy café on a rainy day — warm, smooth, and inviting.
The EA500 is more like a clean glass of sparkling water — refreshing, bright, and attention-grabbing.
Both are excellent in their own right — it just comes down to whether you're in the mood for comfort or clarity.

vs TINHiFi T7
They live in different price range, the Wan’er 2 and the T7 also feels like they’re playing in two different genres. One’s focused on musicality and balance, while the other leans more toward technical flair and treble-forward energy.

Tuning & Overall Tonality
• Wan’er 2 has a warm-neutral, Harman-inspired tuning that’s smooth, laid-back, and more focused on musicality. It sounds like it was designed to be inoffensive, enjoyable, and coherent.
• T7, in contrast, is a bit of an oddball—leaning bright-neutral, with noticeable upper mid and treble emphasis. It feels a little more “technical” in approach, but it may not be as easy on the ears over long sessions.

• Wan’er 2: musical, relaxed, natural-sounding
• T7: leaner, brighter, and more analytical
Bass
• T7’s bass is tight but lean—subbass rolls off early, and midbass isn’t particularly punchy either. It’s clean, sure, but lacks warmth and authority.
• Wan’er 2 offers more bass presence—not boomy, but more body and punch in the midbass. Subbass is modest but enough to add weight. It feels more natural and better balanced.

• Wan’er 2: fuller, more present bass with musical texture
• T7: clean but thin; bas tuning overall more detailed and higher resolution.
Midrange
• Wan’er 2 excels here—its mids are the star of the show. Vocals are smooth, tonally accurate, with a touch of warmth that makes instruments and singers sound inviting.
• T7’s mids are more sterile, especially the lower mids, which can come across as dry and slightly recessed. Upper mids are more aggressive, and female vocals can sound a bit shouty depending on the track.

• Wan’er 2: lush, warm, realistic vocals
• T7: clean but thin, more focused on upper mids
Treble
• T7 is brighter overall, with a forward treble that brings out sparkle and detail—but it can also be fatiguing or borderline harsh, at higher volumes.
• Wan’er 2’s treble is smoother and more laid-back, with enough air to give detail without being fatiguing. It’s a more relaxed listen but lacks the same microdetail that the T7 can reveal.

• Wan’er 2: smoother and safer
• T7: brighter and more detailed, but potentially fatiguing
Technicalities
• Imaging & Separation: The T7 has slightly sharper imaging, thanks to its leaner and brighter sound.
• Soundstage: Neither is exceptionally wide or deep, but the T7 can feel more open due to the treble focus, while Wan’er 2 sounds more intimate but layered well.
• Detail Retrieval: T7 pulls out more microdetails, but sometimes at the cost of tonal realism. Wan’er 2 sounds more “right” overall, even if it’s not as technically flashy.
Build & Comfort
• Wan’er 2’s resin shell is lightweight and ergonomic. It also comes with better stock tips (Tang Sancai) and an improved cable over the original.
• T7 has an aluminum shell, more premium in feel, but some people might find the fit tricky due to the weight and nozzle angle.
Which Should You Choose?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you value smoothness, natural tonality, great vocals, and a fatigue-free sound. It’s the better all-rounder and more forgiving of poor recordings.
• Choose the T7 if you’re a fan of brighter, technical-sounding IEMs, and you prioritize detail retrieval and separation over warmth and musicality.
Final Thoughts
The Wan’er 2 feels like it was tuned by someone who really understands human ears and daily listening preferences. The T7, while impressive in certain technical areas, is more of a niche pick—great for detail lovers, but less emotionally engaging overall, but personally i still prefer the T7 for me its just better overall.

Final Thoughts: A Budget IEM That Aims Higher

The Tangzu Wan’er 2 is an honest, well-thought-out upgrade to the original. It may not be as instantly fun or bass-heavy, but it trades that raw energy for maturity, control, and better overall refinement. It competes in a category that’s increasingly crowded, yet it manages to hold its own by offering a cohesive, smooth, and musical sound that honestly feels like it belongs in a higher price tier.

If you’re after a budget IEM with natural vocals, a well-balanced tuning, and zero harshness, the Wan’er 2 is a strong contender. And if you're coming from the OG Wan’er and wondering if this is a worthy follow-up—the answer is yes, just don’t expect the same punch; expect something more grown up.

Link: https://www.linsoul.com/products/ta...SPe_OSRRX5za1Odw9klA53NJPURybGp5mMU8IcgLkG7DG

Intro

A newly released Tangzu Waner 2nd Gen I mostly declared these as a best budget iem because of its sound quality that wowed me for the first time listen. The forwardness of vocals makes me forget the background what I'm listening its thick and detailed but a few caveats makes it hinder why I called it mostly the best budget iem I've tried.


Disclaimer

I would like to thank Linsoul Audio for arranging these unit for evaluations. My opinions are unbiased, and I haven't been influenced or instructed to praise these IEMs. Every detail in this review is actual experience made by listening for hours everyday.





Specifications


HiFi 10mm Dynamic Driver PET Diaphragm IEM

Impedance
19 Ohms @ 1kHz 20%

Connector
0.78mm 2-Pin 5N Oxygen-Free High-Purity Cable
Plug
3.5mm (Single-Ended)
4.4mm (Balanced)
Type-C

Microphone
With Mic : Type-C
Without Mic : 4.4mm (Balanced)
With/Without Mic: 3.5mm (Single-Ended)

Inclusions
Set of Sancai Eartips(These are treasures)


Build and Comfort

These section where it shows its caveats the build is made of resin yea the body is sturdy but be careful with the faceplate I think it is fragile and make a double caution when pressing it in your ears. In exchange of using a minimal thick of resin it is ergonomic and lightweight and doesn't cause fatigue.


Drivability

Any device can accomodate with waner II but using a more powerful source can improved the bass department a bit.





Sound Aspects


Source used :


IQOO Neo9s pro
Onix Alpha XI1
Fosi Audio ZD3
Boaleco PX2 Tube Amp


This iems spend 40-50 hours of burn in using pink noise before taking details of this review

The Waner II is a warm neutral tuned IEM exhibits musical and vocal forward performance.


Bass

The bass is in the soft side but it is still there when called. To be honest nothing special about its bass. Its just there to present well the sound. To improve this section I recommend to use a more powerful source you will notice the added texture to its bass.


Midrange

This is where it excels. The midrange shows a musical and detailed character.
The clear, lush and vocal forwardness of waner II makes you forget to listen to the other frequency. Both male and female vocals have equal quality theres no predominant to each other. The Waner II really perform well when theres one performing on stage.


Treble

The highs is well extended and and far from piercing your ears with its output. Aside of being is on the relaxed side the highs also inherit a detailed and airy response. Many will find it boring because it lacks sparkle and that zing it still remained fun afterall.


Technicalities

The soundstage of waner II is average for its price, it will not give the listener the out of head experience it wide enough to enjoy the performance. Imaging is good but not exceptional you will notice the performer is only on the center stage. Despite of having a average imaging, layering of instrument on these is superb. Resolution is just okay due to its warmish tuning it will give the user airy and musical instead of super clear and high resolute sound output.


Comparison with Blon 03 II

The fit is better with Waner II due to its lightweight and ergonomic design. In sound comparison,
The blon 03 is brighter, darker background and more forward sounding than waner II. The bass is better in Blon 03 it has better punch and texture than waner II. For the midrange we have a clear winner waner II is superior in handling vocal quality because of its clear, natural and lush sounding. The Blon 03's treble is well refined, in some scenario it can be piercing but it is detailed and energetic. Speaking of being airy and musical Waner II takes the lead.





Conclusion

Waner 2nd gen is a great budget sounding iem for 20 bucks, the sound you will getting on these is beyond that price. I would say it is an alternative budget choice for vocal centric iem if you find the blon 03 aggressive. Just to be careful with its faceplate I think it is fragile just handle it with
care. I also count the added sancai tips on the accessories these are treasures. Thank you for reading!



Non affiliated link below :
https://www.linsoul.com/products/ta...ebda0vfjMvu1M2T5PzppfYfvNft25v2nDMdvph2Zdg0i9

After Waner OG has been released community went off, making echo in budget bracket, bass-lushy entry level beginner iem changed market for year and more, and still very popular among beginners and advanced users as well, with this popularity, colors start to fly over and additional version for Indian market(blue princess has released), which in my opinion was the most beautiful with better refined cable. Tangzu stopped there? Well not really they used this positive energy and released a studio edition, slightly differently tuned than Waner OG, but with some unique perks. And when I thought they will go like old KZ style releasing the Waner PRO version? No, they have actually decided to release a new version of Waner 2, which honestly isn't some improvement on OG or SE. It's more something in the middle between those two, like its son or daughter, and I know how this could sound funny, but that's my impression.


Pros:

Mids and Treble improved
Better cable along with option of choosing 4.4/3.5/type c
Additional eartips Tang Sancai balanced eartips arround 10$
Waifu
Great looking shell

Cons:

Shell is from cheap plastic
Nozzle too thick and short
Not for TrebleHeads nor BassHeads


Disclaimer:

I purchased a unit from Shenzhenaudio, this is my personal experience of testing and listening to Waner 2.


Unboxing, Design, Other:


Unboxing experience is like with every budget iem but Tangzu gave few details just to look a little bit more premium, card box is hard enough to arrive undamaged, waifu is on top of the box, and inside you will have same waifu card(some people collecting this cards), iem's are in foam well protected, under you have 2 boxes with eartips and cable. Mine is 4.4 which is proven to be a mistake, i will explain later why... Design is slightly changed compared to Waner OG, nozzle is shorter and way thicker, so small eartips are suggested, surprisingly nozzle have like little edge, very similar on Tripowin Piccolo, this will allow you to place your ear tips very easy, shell is changed, and most important now on Waner 2 you have 2 pin connector of 0.78mm which is nice to see, finally! Faceplates are beautiful really nice design, i have black version, and for this price it looks dope, but in reality this is just for sight, the moment i have it in my hands, its classic standard cheap plastic, shells are very light and very comfortable, but have in mind thick nozzles will not be best for people with smaller ear canals.

-Cable is improved as well, material is rubber, with 2 pin connectors of 0.78mm, no chin splitter which is a pity it looks like it's there but nothing, connectors are marked with red for right and blue for left, for some reason I couldn't find markings for shells. That cable is slightly better than stock cables but not near to alternative cables of 10$ like from NiceHck and other companies. Hooks are performed and not bad, which is also nice for longer sessions...

-Eartips, pretty decent amount of eartips you will get with Waner 2, this is more like sweetening the deal, very similar to moondrop chu 1, final e500, and few other, but in reality Tang Sancai balanced eartips arent best choice for Waner 2, from some reason this vocal eartips pushing vocals too forward and bass, creating some splashes around low and mid area, but if you don't have anything else you will be fine.

Specs:

Single 10mm PET dynamic driver
Sensitivity: 113.5 dB @ ] kHz
Impedance:19 Ω @ 1kHz 20%
Freq range :20 Hz-20 kHz
Cable material:100*0.08+250D silver plated copper
Cable length:1.2 m 5%
Socket interface:0.78 2-Pin Flat socket
(For more informations, please feel free to visit Tangzu site, it's more detailed)

Gear:

I have used various dongles, dacs, daps, cables, eartips followed by software for android like uapp, fiio music app player for flac and wav files, and spotify/youtube for online but with less compression.

LG V50
Motorola G54
Echo Mini
Shanling M0 Pro
Fiio JA11/KA11
Tempotec Sonata BHD
NiceHck cables IcyMoon(3.5mm) and SP4(type C)
Eartips, Epro Pro01, Final E type, S400...


Overall Sound:

Before i go with sound profile and other, very important thing to mention, Waner 2 is very sensitive, so my first experience with using 4.4 was a little bit futile, and even worse i pushed high gain option, this iem is already sensitive and will not benefit from 4.4 with high gain or 3.5 with high gain, 3.5 is enough and very welcome, this is just my experience, and if you had similar issues, you will know what to change. Sound profile is warm, but not lushy warm like on Waner OG, something in middle with OG and Studio Edition, Bass is almost the same like on Waner OG, while mid area is slightly improved with clarity, treble got refined with details, but not so much, just slightly noticeable, and for this money this is enough...


Bass:

Waner 2 doesn't offer some improvements in low region, pretty much is same like with OG version, bass is somehow punchy with very slow roll over with decent amount, not controlled, they haven't solved any of previous problems of OG version, its often very muddy and on some tracks bleed or splash over mids, but in some moderate way, its very warm bass, giving you that vibe of pleasant experience. Sub-bass is here and there, followed with enough rumble it's not best for the price, but i haven't expected more. There are enough textures of midbass, and it's not the best, but for beginners this will be enough to sail in this hobby. That thick nozzle could be a problem for some, because the seal will not be perfect, so some possible leaks will or could happen, resulting in poor bass performances...


Mids:

Mid area is slightly improved on Waner 2, providing you with much better clear and warm vocals which are sweet and sound natural, giving you that smooth feeling of listening experience, and this isn't something present on all iem's in this budget range, even instruments sound more organic and live creating unique experience, all of this bring glory to old Waner OG and now is present with version 2. Transition from bass to the mids is well executed and followed with all this warmth, even though it's not the best due to sometimes dirty bass, but it's decent for longer sessions which does not include critical listening and is rather focused on enjoyment.

Highs:

There are some improvements than on previous OG versions but not so much, Waner 2 has more clarity in treble area, here and there some microdetails are popping out which is nice to catch, resolution is average, along with detail retrieval.
For a period of 2+ hours listening i did not encounter any noises, nor Waner 2 fatigued even on most busiest tracks. And to keep Waner 2 more enjoyable, moderate volume down as possible with 3.5 without high gain, it's clear Waner 2 isnt some treblehead iem enough capable to benefit from high gain.

SoundStage and Imaging:

Soundstage is almost average, classic 3d, with a little bit of a strange presentation, where there is bass forward and vocals a little bit back, it's not spacious nor is intimate so pretty normal for this price range. Imaging is just enough to hear and pinpoint location of instruments, layering is under average, but again enough for not demanding listeners...

Comparison:

I will skip Waner OG and Studio Edition in this section, since I have already mentioned this iem's enough.

KZ Castor Bass, Basstor is an old contender in this in budget range, it easy outperform Waner 2 with bass quality and control, vocals are little bit better on basstor, while Waner 2 is more warm and little bit more musical than Basstor, its matter of personal preference...

Tripowin Piccolo, even Piccolo is like dying breed, very hard to find this days, Piccolo is better allrounder than Waner 2, everything on Piccolo is simple better, from low's, mid's, high's Piccolo offer more neutral signature which sometimes lean to bright, better built quality is on Piccolo metal shell, nozzle type is almost same, but its not thicker like on Waner 2, yes Piccolo was originally quoted for 35$ and reduced on 10$...

Tanchjim One, Bass on One is deeper and more full with more organic sound than Waner 2, One signature is neutral, and treble is almost the same with some minor details, so it's more about preference...

EW200, even is like 50% more than Waner 2, Ew200 is neutral bright iem, with amazing treble extension and punchy bass, but for some people are shouty and harsh, all of this could be reduced or miniMAZEd with proper ear tips, so if you don't enjoy treble with neutral-bright signature, Waner 2 is good choice..

Final e500, very similar iem's even e500 are 5y older, both signatures are warm, both products offer great eartips, bass on final e500 is slightly better without ruining mids, while Waner 2, offer removable cable and better termination options which is better for longer run.

Conclusion:

Overall Waner 2 isn't bad, if you are beginner this will be a great choice for you, or you wanna to collect all Waner edition's, it's more designed for chilling sessions than for critical listening, which sometimes could be boring. I expected much more from Waner 2, since Tangzu put hard effort into aggressive marketing to promote this iem like a new miracle, i find it just a mediocre choice of sidegrade, not spectacular or special, just hype wrapped with marketing. I hope Tangzu will release a better version of Waner 2 and surpass the OG version, which in that time was godlike in budget-range!

DISCLAIMER
The review I'm about to share reflects my personal experience and provides an honest evaluation regarding this set. I am completely unaffiliated from the brands I review. I did not receive (or will receive) any financial or monetary incentives in exchange for writing this review, I wrote this review of my own free will and all of the opinions you'll read are my own.

This unit was provided by Linsoul Audio for free in exchange for an honest and detailed review. Rest assured, this does not affect my opinions about this set. Thank you, Linsoul, for your continuous support!



INTRODUCTION
The original Tangzu Wan’er S.G. has dominated the ultra budget price bracket for a very long time since it was released, and personally for me, there is still no $20 IEM that can beat this IEM. Until now, the original Wan’er is still my top pick for this price bracket, and I would argue that it can compete with other sets above the price range.

Now here is Tangzu’s Wan’er 2, the successor, in an attempt to dethrone the original and compete with themself. Spoiler alert: Tangzu gracefully succeeded. All my nitpicks regarding the original Wan’er? Gone. Tangzu did what other chi-fi companies can’t, and that is to improve their product by removing or changing all things that we hated about it, but at the same time, maintaining the reason why we loved it. So, here are the gears I have used in the past couple of days as I am reviewing the Tangzu Wan’er 2:

Eartips: Tangzu Sancai
Cable: Stock cable
DAC/Dongle: Shanling H5, and iBasso DC07 Pro
Phone/Device: Either my iPhone XR or my laptop
Music Player: Spotify, and Apple Music


PACKAGING
I still can’t believe that Tangzu managed to pack all of this inside a box of a $20 IEM. Inside the box, besides the cable and IEMs, you will see 2 sets of eartips. The first set is the regular stock tips by Tangzu with three different sizes (small, medium, large) which has decent build and relatively feels good inside the ear canals. But at the same time, Tangzu also included a set of Tangzu Tang Sancai eartips with one pair each size which is already amazing as its own because it retails for $12, which is more than half of the Wan’er 2’s retail price.

The IEM’s cable, on the other hand, also feels amazing. It feels premium and has a good build quality. The cable is soft and has a smooth texture, doesn’t build up that much memory, is not stiff, and also feels very durable from the 2pin connectors up to the 3.5mm or 4.4.mm termination. Yep you have read it right, though the cable isn’t modular, you can buy a 3.5mm or 4.4mm version of the Wan’er 2.



BUILD QUALITY, DESIGN, AND COMFORT
Regarding the build quality of the Wan’er 2, it feels relatively durable for a hollow plastic shell. The shell itself is translucent and you can definitely see the 10mm Dynamic Driver inside. It also has a distinct weight and thickness on it that makes it feel more durable than your usual plastic $20 IEM. Its shell shape is more universal and will likely feel comfortable for most ears if not all. There are no bumps or sharp corners that can produce comfort issues. The Wan’er 2 also has flat 2pin connectors now. The nozzles are on the shorter side and are not that invasive inside the ear canal, and when paired with the Tang Sancai eartips? It feels and seals perfectly.


SOUND IMPRESSIONS
The Tangzu Wan’er 2’s sound signature is very balanced, sounds almost neutral but there’s slight boost in bass region and upper mids. This set can come across as a vocal-centric IEM that is tuned safely and smoothly. Overall timbre sounds very natural to the point that you might find yourself lost in the track you are currently playing.

Bass
This set’s bass is slightly laid back and does not take the limelight, but still feels present and not lacking. Sub-bass has a smooth character, but the mid-bass has a hint of tightness which maintains the distinctness of the bass region, that’s why it can still be heard despite being laid-back. Wan’er 2’s bass texture is one of the best I have heard within this price range, it is tastefully tuned.

Do note that this set’s bass is far from being basshead-level bass, to be honest, I can definitely see that some might find it lacking in this region, but again, this is not the Wan'er 2’s aiming for.

Mids
Mid-range has a clean yet musical presentation. Lower-mids are not overly recessed to sound thin, but also not that colored so that it can maintain its cleanliness all while sounding very musical. The upper-mids on the other hand is slightly forward and highlights the vocals very well. This combination of the lower half and the upper half of the mid-range makes the vocals forward, but also sounds natural and smooth. Wan’er 2’s vocal presentation is basically its greatest strength. Though forward, the upper mid range of this IEM is never going to come across as shouty. It makes the transient attack of certain instruments like guitar plucks and trumpets smooth and very smooth sounding.

Treble
The amount of treble energy on this set is just right to make the treble shimmer and sizzles noticeable but not too sharp. Treble is very textured and detailed but retains its overall smoothness because of its treble air that decays smoother and slightly slower than usual. It makes the high notes of vocals and instrument have a good amount of sustain before rolling off completely.

Wan’er 2’s treble is not bright, and complements the mid range, especially the bass region, very well. No peaks and aggressiveness present, and really supports the upper midrange really great by providing sufficient energy up top.

Details, Imaging, and Soundstage
Because of the Tangzu Wan’er 2’s tuning, it is one of the best within the price range when it comes to technicalities. The detail retrieval is above average despite its smooth presentation. You can hear certain micro-details easily like fingers rubbing lightly on a guitar string, or something like small breaths of singers in between each line and other details like that.

When it comes to imaging and soundstage, in my experience, this set works better horizontally than vertically. Soundstage is definitely wide and the accuracy of the directions from left to right and front to back is really good, you can pinpoint instrument directions very well horizontally but regarding the height and depth of the soundstage as well as the accuracy of its vertical imaging, it becomes a bit more challenging.



VS THE ORIGINAL WAN’ER
As I have said earlier, for me, the Wan’er 2 is almost perfect. Tangzu removed everything I hate about the original Wan’er and maintained everything I love about it. But what exactly are the changes that took place, as well as the differences between the two?

So let us talk about the non-sound related stuff first. First of all, the Wan’er 2 has better inclusions. It has good eartips included which is more than the half of the price of the whole set, as well as a better and well built cable. The shell itself is built better both in shell design and its durability. Shell shape feels more comfortable to the ears, not to mention, the transition between QDC to straight 2pin connectors. Build quality feels more premium and more durable compared to the original. The nozzles are a bit shorter too, so it can either make you more comfortable with this set or the other way around because maybe you are just like me who wants a deeper seal and longer nozzles.

The biggest issue with the original Wan’er is its build quality. The QDC pin connector breaks relatively fast, the shell can crack easily as well as the connectors, and the glue that holds the shells together can easily lose its effect. All of that issue, because of how the Wan’er 2’s improvement in build quality and design, I feel like will most likely happen more rarely.

Now for the sound part. Did it change? Honestly, not that much. At first when I tried to A/B test the original with this set, I noticed no changes at all. But as the time went by, I realized that the sub-bass from the Wan’er 2 is a tad bit more laid-back and slightly smoother. Upper-mids also seem to be slightly more forward and brighter up top on the higher notes. But all of these tonality changes are really hard to discern at first, it was almost as if there were no changes at all regarding its tuning.



CONCLUSION
I basically said all the good stuff above, and I have nothing else to say. I can simply (but confidently) say that this is definitely better than the original and will now be my top choice within the $20 price bracket.

Man, I never thought that the same company that made the best ultra-budget IEM (personally) will also be the same company that will dethrone it. Well done, Tangzu. This is an easy 10 out of 10.

LINK
Tangzu Wan'er 2 from Linsoul