100+ Head-Fier
Well engineered all-in-one solution
Pros: Latest ESS chip
No hiss with IEMs
Plenty of power
All important inputs, including USB type-C and Bluetooth with LDAC
All important headphone outputs: XLR, 6,35mm and 4,4mm
Cons: Design


Based in China, Questyle Audio Engineering is celebrated for its skill in producing DACs and headphone amplifiers. They are especially recognized for their Current Mode Amplification (CMA) technology, which is acclaimed for removing metallic tones and considered superior to other competing technologies.

Highlighting their dedication to innovation, Questyle has garnered more than 20 global awards since 2015, such as the CES Innovation Award, iF Industrial Design Award, and VGP Lifestyle Award, to name a few.

With the launch of their newest product, the CMA 15, there is significant anticipation for a device that promises sophisticated design and quality. It remains to be seen whether it will uphold the lofty expectations established by its forerunners.



How did I stumble upon the CMA15? The onset of the global pandemic had me seeking a replacement for my trusted Bose QC35 headphones, which I previously considered to be among the best available. Unaware of the extensive head-fi universe until then, I began a journey of successive upgrades, immersing myself in the audio realm. After evaluating various models, I eventually settled on the Abyss 1266 PHI TC, Hifiman Susvara, and Focal Utopia. For listening to music on the move, I opted for the Empire Ears Odin and Oriolus Traillii JP.

Now, in order to build a solid foundation for my headphone setup, I have shifted my quest towards finding the perfect DAC/AMP combination. I believe that headphones account for approximately 95% of the listening experience, thus minimizing the impact of other equipment, cables, or accessories. Although these elements are important, my initial step was to identify the ideal headphones before seeking out the other components needed to complete the setup. Accommodating a wide range from the sensitive Odins to the power-hungry Susvaras is no easy task. I've tried out various devices, such as the JDS Labs Element II, RME ADI-2 DAC, Topping D90SE/A90 stack, Niimbus US4+, and Chord Hugo 2. Presently, my lineup includes the Shanling EM5, Felix Euforia MKII, and WA7 3rd generation. The CMA15 is also on my radar as I continue to refine my DAC/AMP system.

I had previously been intrigued by the CMA15, but it was not available in my area. I considered buying it online, yet the scarcity of reviews and information deterred me. Then, as if by destiny, Questyle announced a head-fi review tour. I quickly signed up and, fortunately, was chosen, leading to a fortuitous series of events.

And so, the stage is set. I aim to provide meaningful insights into the CMA15 and share my personal experiences with the device.

Build Quality​

Let's explore the basics.

The CMA15 serves a dual function, combining a DAC and an amplifier in one unit. It's larger than setups like the Topping A90/D90 stack but smaller compared to the Niimbus US4+. It fits well on a desktop, though it takes up a significant amount of space.

The build quality is solid; the switches feel smooth and convey a sense of luxury. The entire unit is robust and meticulously crafted, with no weak or unstable parts. However, while the finish is impressive, it doesn't reach the highest industry standard. Questyle could improve this feature to match the quality of their rivals. The design is pragmatic, reflecting its engineering-driven creation where functionality takes precedence over appearance. Were aesthetics my only criterion, I might prefer the Shanling EM5 for my desktop setup rather than the CMA15.



It's a common belief that devices with multiple functions might lack in specific areas. Yet, the DAC portion of the CMA15 defies this expectation. It utilizes the ES9038PRO chip, the latest premium chip from ESS intended for both audiophile use and professional studio settings. This places it among the elite chips on the market today, particularly for those interested in the delta-sigma approach.

Current Mode Amplification​

Talking about this subject feels a bit beyond my expertise since I lack the technical background of an engineer and don't fully grasp the complex workings involved. However, I'll rely on Questyle's explanation for better clarity:

"Central to Current Mode Amplification is the principle of using current, as opposed to voltage, for the amplification of audio signals. This contemporary method of audio amplification is distinctively superior to traditional audio amplifiers in performance. Considered the 'engine' of the audio system, Current Mode Amplification boasts an entirely discrete and sophisticated structure. This allows for an impeccable sound performance so authentic that it feels as if one is present in the original recording environment. With the utilization of Current Mode Amplification technology, even everyday headphones and speaker systems can deliver an elevated auditory experience."

Questyle owns the patent for this technology, and many of their products include the initials (CMA), marking this as a signature feature that differentiates them from competitors. I am truly excited to experience how this translates into actual sound quality.


I'll keep this section brief; for an in-depth look at the connection options, please consult the product's datasheet or its official website. The device offers an extensive array of connectivity features: XLR and RCA outputs, RCA analog inputs, USB Type-B and Type-C ports, as well as optical and S/PDIF inputs. Additionally, it features Bluetooth input with LDAC codec support, a notable addition, especially since it's compatible with Apple Music.

A particular aspect I value highly is the USB Type-C input. It's surprising that many companies still haven't embraced USB Type-C, opting instead to release new products with the outdated micro-USB in 2022.

For headphones and IEMs, the device provides all the standard connections: XLR, 6.35mm, and 4.4mm jacks, reducing the necessity for various adapters, which is definitely a plus! 😊.



Okay, let's delve into the sound quality and performance :).

First off, I want to share my approach to evaluating sound quality for clarity. As I've previously stated, I believe the choice of headphones plays a crucial role in shaping the audio experience, making up about 95% of it, more than any other equipment, cables, or accessories you might use. Of course, your viewpoint may differ, which is completely fine. Audio enjoyment is a personal journey, and we all have our individual tastes and priorities. That’s my perspective.

For my testing to be consistent, I use a sound meter to ensure the volume levels are equal across all devices, utilizing a 1KHZ sine wave and adjusting it to hit 80DB. While I usually opt for a lower volume during leisure listening, I turn it up a bit for test conditions. This approach is not as effective with IEMs, hence my evaluations in those instances lean more towards the subjective side.

I've also compiled a collection of short audio loops that include sounds from instruments like cymbals, beats, and hi-hats, which helps me compare how they are rendered on different equipment. These brief loops are beneficial for maintaining a clear memory of the sounds as I switch between devices.

In general, the CMA15 provides an exceptionally clear, detailed, and transparent sound across the frequency range. There’s no dominant or overshadowing element, which I find perfect. The device effectively fades into the background, allowing my headphones to shine.

With the Susvara, the natural resonance and accurate instrument reproduction are remarkably evident. On the other hand, the 1266 TC reveals an abundance of detail, highlighting its unique industrial sound and strong bass. The CMA15 has sufficient power to drive these headphones without any shortcomings. Using my headphones with the CMA15 was thoroughly enjoyable.



For me, the ability of a device to handle IEMs without producing any hiss is a critical criterion before considering it for purchase. I've tried various devices at different price ranges, and many have disappointed me with the hiss they produce when used with my IEMs. A device that can operate without this hiss demonstrates superior performance and engineering quality in my eyes.

The CMA15 stands out in this respect, as it operates without any hiss with my IEMs, which is something I highly appreciate. Using the CMA15 with the Traillii and Odin was an absolute delight. The Odin revealed intricate details, especially in its superb bass texture, while the Traillii offered speed that could match a Formula 1 car, with electrostatic treble that sparkled exactly to my liking. :ksc75smile:




Overall, I was very impressed with the CMA15. It comes fully equipped with essential inputs, including a contemporary USB type-C port and Bluetooth compatibility with LDAC codec. For enthusiasts, it provides all the necessary headphone outputs: XLR, 6.35mm, and 4.4mm. The superior audio quality is unmistakably due to its incorporation of the latest ESS flagship chips, resulting in a sound that is richly detailed, clear against a quiet backdrop, and authentically reproduced, just as one would expect. Importantly, the device maintains a neutral sound profile, allowing the inherent characteristics of your headphones to come through while also delivering sufficient power.

My only criticism is related to its design, which feels somewhat outdated compared to my other more modern-looking devices. However, this point is highly subjective since aesthetic tastes differ greatly, and this comment could be applicable to other devices as well, such as the Niimbus US4+. Aside from this minor aspect, in terms of sound quality and connectivity, it meets all my expectations for such a product, and I wholeheartedly recommend it👌.
Last edited:
Gorgeous pics. I'm considering this at the moment, so appreciate your detailed review.


New Head-Fier
An elegant desk solution that anyone can love
Pros: Accurate sounding
No audio artifact
Low gain mode can drive IEMs
Superb build quality
Low latency
Cons: Remote receiver resides in the middle
Sound quality/tuning doesn't have much character
Disclaimer: This review is part of a North America review tour afforded to me by the manufacturer in exchange for my honest opinion, there's no incentive for me to write a good or bad review here.

Then again, nobody really gives horrible reviews unless the product is truly unredeemable. I think readers should take that into account weighing the scores.

A little about me
I'm not an engineer, let alone an acoustic engineer, so I can't formulate all my thoughts in an objectively scientific manner. I'm trained in social science, more precisely behavior economics. I tend to see a lot of human fallacies, so I realize my impressions, along with others', may also be under the influence of such fallacies.

My experience with audio gears started with headphones, and I was wowed by an entry-level Audezes coming from outside of the audiophile world in the early 2010s. Then my faith and expectations in the hobby got destroyed by the piercing sound of HD800 hooked to a Chord mojo. Then long story short, over the years I have eventually ventured into the far end of headphones and found my equilibrium at the Utopia with the legendary Cavalli LAu and the beautiful Italian Aqua La Scala 2. With that, I then went into the upgrade spree with speakers as well, with my most recent prized precession being Hegel H590 + Dynaudio Contour 60s. Fast forward to now, life is slowly creeping in, to interfere with my love for audio gears, I had to let the speaker systems go. I'm finally settled in IEMs because they are the most "life (wife) - friendly" options.

About my gears
That brings me to my testing gears. For source, I use either the MacBook Pro 2018, a desktop PC, or Innuous Zen mk3 music sever running a Roon Core. The benchmark dac/amp I have my trusty iBasso DX300 with amp module 12. As for the intermediary between an amp and my ears, I'm only using IEMs for this review. They are UM Mason Fusang, Final a8000, Leisurely Audio e16. To offer some perspectives for those who haven't heard these IEMs yet, I will try to rank them in a few areas of characteristics:
Overall cohesiveness and completeness: UM>Final>e16;
Details: e16>UM>Final;
Bass: e16>UM>Final;
Mid: UM>Final>e16;
Treble: UM>e16>Final;
I overall tend to reach for the UM buds more. Because they just sound correct and engaging in almost every song.

Build Quality

I think most will agree with me that the CMA15 is an extraordinarily well-made piece of gear. It feels smooth to touch, the weight is substantial for the size. The knobs and dial all scream quality. Some people knock the score down a bit because of the screws, but I feel they actually compliment the overall build with an authentic retro look. The size is perfect for a desktop system due to its shallow depth and thinness. The warm yellow indicator lights illuminate with the right amount of brightness. This is all I have to say about the build, it's awesome.



Sound Quality

I find everything to sound right with my small collection of IEMs. It sounds very similar to my iBasso in almost every way, and I'm not sure how I feel about this.
I had very high hope coming in, thinking a desktop solution will hand down have a leg up in every aspect, if not at least in a few areas. That didn't turn out. But on the other hand, I truly love my Ibasso dx300, it's a capable machine that never failed me, and probably considered one of the best DAPs out there. But with my prior desktop and speakers experience, I just have this belief (justified or not), that a similarly priced desktop Dac must be better than a DAP. I was a little baffled they were performing similarly sonic-wise. Most strangely, they even sound pretty much the same. I think I'd struggle to tell them apart in a blind test. You would think it's more strange when you realize they have very different DAC chip implementations - iBasso has 4 Cirrus Logic chips, and the CMA 15 has an ESS 9038 chip. iBasso is powered by a battery, and CMA15 is by a wall socket.

This all put me in a special reviewer limbo when I can barely tell my baseline and treatment apart. Especially that the audiophile terms are useless all by themselves. But, it's a responsible thing that I at least try to the best of my ability in describing how I experienced it. CMA 15 like the DX300, has an airy treble, albeit not what I'd describe as sweet nor seducing, it's just accurate. It has no obvious flaw, and doesn't bring any extra attention to peaky trebles. It feels as if the DAC/amp is taking a back seat to let the music and earphones express themselves fully without adding artifacts. Mid-range is quite nice with a full body to it that will bring any music to life. Again, no bloat, no additives, just neutral with a slight hint of warmness. Think of it as if the CMA is a neutral-sounding and neutral-looking orchestral hall with a warm AC turned on during a cool autumn evening, just letting the bands be the center of the performance. Bass is nice and without any noticeable flaw, but it's not the deepest I've heard. So, I guess that's something to improve on in the future. I hear no difference in soundstage between iBasso and CMA15. I have to note that headphones experience on these might be different from my IEM experience. I can't compare, because my Utopia had a broken driver recently.


It's my conclusion that the defining hallmark of Chi-Fi is becoming the anti-fragility of functions. Try anything you can think of on it, and use it however you want. It will likely work because features they can add at a reasonable cost, the companies will do it for you without making a fuss about it. For example, my setup isn't a well-treaded pass making 100% emphasis on IEMs, but it worked as intended - no noise floor issue, drivers are not blown, and my eardrums still exist in their perfect state of happiness.

I also have to add the less talked about feature of low latency, latency is non-existent in my setup connecting any source I have. Gaming, movie, conferences on these are perfect. So once again, this is another life-friendly detail that shouldn't get overlooked even if Questyle doesn't advertise it. It probably owns this quality to the newest and the greatest XMOS X216 USB module they put in there. For comparison, my iBasso has a noticeable one-and-a-half-second gap.


You should seriously consider this if you want to holistically improve life quality while maintaining Hi-Fi integrity.
If you're like me, want to upgrade from a DAP to a desktop solution, prepare to be shocked at how good the DAPS already are these days.
Last edited:
Nice impressions.

In my opinion using this kind of a device with iems is WAY overkill and simply not necessary. I agree with you that today's DAPs are more than up to the task and will also work very well with easy to drive headphones.

A desktop amp is better used with hard to drive over the ear cans that require either a lot of voltage or current. The small size that allows flexible placement is also a huge plus IMO. Where this also shines is its all-in-one capabilities that reduce complexity with little or no compromise in performance. Sell your separate dac, amp and cables and put some money in your pocket. When listening for pleasure do you really care if setup A has a touch better (subjective) performance in one area or another or would you rather just settle into the music?
Brams, I agree with your philosophy in approaching musical enjoyment. I’m more and more into simplicity. It was those small subjective difference I seek using so much free time and not so free money, when I did hear those difference with something new, I got a rush of geeky pleasure. Then it came with the realization of: what have I done with my space with these clutters, and what have I done with my money.

I have to say, the biggest appreciation for sound quality I get are usually cheap or free. By far the most enjoyable thing I do is hearing consumer level sound quality during commute for a few days and then switch back to my setup listening to the same music. And also upsampling through ROON makes a huge difference for me.


100+ Head-Fier
Questyle CMA Fifteen - All you need!
Pros: all-in-one unit
powerful amplification
remote control
build quality and looks
sound quality
flip switches!!
Cons: flashy logos on front

I possess the little brother Questyle CMA 400i for many years now and still a big advocate of this all-in-one unit, so I was eager to see what the current top-linne model can offer. I was always close to buying the Questyle CMA Twelve Master but was so pleased with the CMA 400i that it didn't happen.

As part of the European review tour I received the marvelous Questyle CMA Fifteen to try out for myself.

So I brought ALL my current headphones to the table to be tested with the Questyle CMA Fifteen over many days ...

Headphones that are very good on CMA15: Meze Empyrean (Burson 3XP Combo im PowerAmp mode might have a slight edge here)
Headphones that are excellent on CMA15: Denon AH-D9200, Kennerton Rögnir Dynamic, Kennerton Rögnir, Hifiman HE6SE v2
Headphones that really wowed me on CMA15: Klipsch HP-3, EM-U Teak, Dan Clark Audio Aeon 2 Closed, Focal Celestee, V-Moda Crossfade M-100
  • overall neutral tuning with great snappy bass and authority
  • brings out the individual sound character of each headphone in the best possible manner
  • single-ended output equally good as XLR/4.4 balanced (verified with Hart Audio Cable interconnect switch)
  • satisfying double relay click when turned on (singe relay click when switching source to analog input)
  • finally the return of the analog input (even its single-ended)
  • educated version of the Questyle CMA 400i
"chains" used for comparison:
  • Gustard X26pro + Headamp GS-X mini
  • Burson Soloist 3XP + Composer 3XP
  • Singxer SA-1 + Denafrips Ares II
  • Chord Hugo TT2
  • Questyle CMA 400i
  • Questyle CMA15 + Ares II (RCA)

The Questyle CMA Fifteen really gets the most out of your headphones without trying to change their individual character and adds a pleasing balanced bass authority.
Can also drive powerhungry headphones like the Hifiman HE6SE v2 without a sweat to their full potential even the nominal power output might not indicate that - there comes Questyles superior amplification ciruit into play!

Especially non-top-of-the-line headphones (like Klipsch HP-3, EM-U Teak, Dan Clark Audio Aeon 2 Closed, Focal Celestee, V-Moda Crossfade M-100) really shined on the CMA15.

Might not dethrone the Gustard X26pro + Headamp GS-X mini combo for me (yet), but if you look for true-to-the-source all-in-one unit with nimble bass presence and authority don't look any further - the Questyle CMA Fifteen is right for you!

... and if you would want me to choose between the Chord TT2 and the CMA15, I would go with the Questyle! I am really convinced that I need one myself too sooner or later:)

Update #01: I sold my Chord TT2 and did order my own Questyle CMA Fifteen after the review was posted and the review unit passed to next reviewer
Last edited:
I walked the same route as you.. 3 years ago i extensively A-B ed CMA12 and 400i and couldnt point any difference except 12 having more spare power which my HD800 didnt need.
Ofc. both have the same AKM chip.

So i then bought the 400i to modify it to take analog input.

Have you compared 15's internal DAC to TT2 connected to 15's analog input too?
@Reactcore unfortunately I did not try out the TT2 as a DAC to the CM15's analog input (only the Ares II briefly).
But for both all-in-ones (the CMA15 and the TT2) I would say the amplification section is the real star of the show and the DAC part is well implemented, but is not the differentiator (for pure DAC usage I find the Gustard X26pro superior to both of them).
Even I never had the chance to try the CMA12, you will get a little less bass bloom on the CMA15 compared with the 400i, thus more nuanced and snappy bass presentation. As a consequence I already sold the TT2 and still aim to buy a CMA15 myself in the future!


New Head-Fier
top class amp/dac all in one
Pros: All in one
last generation DAC
excellent construction
complete connection
excellent sound quality
complet : bluetooth, MQA...
Cons: not huge difference compared to the previous generation
So I was able to test drive the new Questyle CMA Fifteen DAC/AMP.



CMA12 / CMA15

Let's first talk about the device, as far as I could determine, the form factor is exactly the same as the CMA Twelve. Note that I am not referring to the "Master" version because I could not find the Master specifications on the Questyle site.

Over the years I have become used to brilliantly and beautifully constructed pieces (such as Musical Fidelity’s Trivista 300, the Cayin 500 as well as some Cairn mono blocks…) it immediately became apparent that the quality of construction is of the highest level. I was impressed by the somewhat artisanal type of build, a very thick aluminum front, a cover that oozes the same quality, everything is impeccably put together. Even the bottom where the round aluminum feet are mounted with an integrated O-ring shows as being from a very high quality, down to the smallest detail. Even the screws are black whereas on the CAM Twelve they were metal, in short I would descrive the overall quality as superb.

As far as its outputs are concerned, the CAM Fifteen has all the current connectors to connect your headphones, the universal single-ended 6.35mm jack, as well as 4.4mm Pentaconn connector and an XLR4 connector for balanced headphones.

If the quality/manufacturing/price ratio already was really nice for the CMA Twelve, I can only say that this has improved even more for the CAM Fifteen. I was really curious to listen to this new model with a more recent DAC, especially since this denotes a shift away from the Twelve’s original AKM 4490 DAC to ESS. As we all know about the AKM factory fire in 2020, an event that has disrupted the audio industry and forced many manufacturers to find alternatives, all while trying to safeguard (part of) their house sound.

I listened to this CMA Fifteen with different songs, some that I don't necessarily listen to anymore but that I've heard so much on different gear that I know them well as well as others that I consider to be well recorded. Listening was done from Audirvana Studio that reads form a library stored on my NAS. Most music was ripped from my CDs and where possible SACDs. Aside from that, I also connected the Fifteen to a MacBook on which I have Apple Music installed. So I alternated betweeb the CMA Twelve and Fifteen with a Wireworld Starlight 8 USB cable

• Maxime Le Forestier / Rather guitar / Ambalaba

On the CMA Fifteen, when playing with the Meze Empyrean, there is a lot of room and width in the soundstage, there is space between the different guitars. It does lack a little support and extension in the treble of the guitars on the left side, but the energy of the audience is great, full of beautiful sounds of clapping hands, and no distortion.

Switching to the Focal Utopia, immediately there is additional details, background details …. Everything is there but it's also clearer. Indeed although Maxime's voice seems pinched at the exit of the Empyrean, that’s also typical of the Utopia (it seems that there is an expensive cable that corrects all that…) . But it's a different presentation and we "get used to it". Switching back to the Empyrean also shows a "blown up" rendition. The Meze Empyrean definitely is the better match with the Fifteen. It's beautiful to hear the resonance of the rooms, although the width is a fraction less than on the Empyrean. Of course, with Focal Utopias, listening becomes a little more technical.

Going back to the CMA Twelve, the mid/treble is a little less refined, the applause is a little thinner, on the other hand the percussion on the piece "the man with the bouquet of flowers" seems more pronounced to me, it comes with good slam.

I don't have any other cable with my Focal Utopia to test (DM audio) but with the Empyrean I cannot stand the silver Meze cable, on the Twelve, the rendering is a little harder than on the CMA Fifteen.

• Eric Clapton / Unplugged / Laila

The different voices are well differentiated, especially the female vocals. With the guitars, the treble is gliding a little, I would like a little more support there. They come with good quality of timbre and detail though. I therefore reach for the Utopia to control the treble, it is better but could do better for me. The fact remains also there that the Fifteen offers a slightly better balanced overall sound where the CMA Twelve is a little less balanced and controlled.

• Lindi Ortega / Faded Gloryville / Ashes

On the Fifteen voices are superbly rendered, a very rich sounds, I play 2-3 guitar sustain tracks that are equally well rendered

• Madonna / Celebration / La Isla Bonita

The details in the beginning of the track are well defined, we clearly perceive the voice in the background. Switching to the CMA Twelve I did not notice a big difference on the percussion, and possibly as a result of this, impact of the bass also seems to be slightly reduced.

Kid Francescoli / Play Me Again / Moon

The synthetic sheets take off, some sounds seem to turn around the head, I definitely prefer this type of song on the Empyrean

• SPOHR: Music For Violin and Harp. Flight 1

Really nice airy representation, each instrument clearly defined on its respective side, it's relaxing but again for me if the violin creaked a bit more it wouldn't bother me. With this kind of music the Focal Utopia really takes off, its precision, its rigorous side work wonders, the notes really shine. It's superb and this makes clear that the CMA Twelve sound a little harsher.

Hop a Shot by Norah Jones/New York City

It sounds good, I "rediscover" this piece a little. At times the voice is doubled sometimes in unison sometimes slightly offbeat magnificent, it is superbly rendered and very important, no sibilance.

And a completely unknown album!! Come Away With Me

With “Shoot the Moon”” the CMA 15 reads 88.2/96. There is no time to relax here, both headphones are being driven at perfection. Both the Focal Utopia and the Empyrean come out with perfection, there is no lack of anything in here.

I play a bit of rock and other oases / acdc / Metallica / Cure / Ben Harper (superb on Live From Mars).

In short, the CMA Fifteen is a very nice and good device, it is powerful enough even for many harder to drive headphones. If the CMA Twelve was already very good with the Utopia, the Fifteen is even better I think, especially for the mid/treble part. The amp allows you to appreciate the results of each headphone. The pairing with the Empyrean is also very good, where the Fifteen’s slightly softer rendering allows me to use the silver meze upgrade cable. This allows me to gain detail and precision.

A little word with the Denon ADH 9200 which sincerely does not have to be ashamed in front of the two more expensive headphones. The Denon is rich, detailed to such an extent that at certain times I got so carried away by the music that I briefly wondered if it was the Denon or the Focal that I had on my head. For a closed back, it is amazing how open they seem. These are magnificent headphones that pair extremely well with the Fifteen. It combines the qualities, the detail, the bass. The only thing is that you might have to calm it down a bit with a copper cable. This is where I keep repeating myself because here the slightly softer side of the CMA Fifteen makes a big difference in the end, I can keep the Denon for a good while without getting tired. The Denon 9200 and the Questyle CMA Fifteen are an astonishing pairing!!!

So finally .. should one get rid of a CMA Twelve in favor of the new CMA Fifteen? In my eyes that is not a clear decision. Even if I recognize an undeniable gain on many aspects, where even the bass in the end may be cleaner on the Fifteen, its character also is a little bit less demonstrative, less punchy.

In the end it has left me in doubt .. because with this CMA Fifteen I find a certain balance and warmer sound that I like a little, the same balance and sound that made me prefer the rendering of my Hiby R6 to my Fiio m15! Indeed .. does this turn me into more of an ESS Sabre lover?"
Excellent question @brams and my answer would be minimal.
I was at Singapore's CANJAM earlier this month and can report when I compared the CMA12 Masters vs CMA15, the CMA15 could not hold a candle to the CMA12 Masters in every single sonic capability.

I tested it with ZMF Vérité (both the open & closed) and tested both it on 6.35mm and XLR4.

The CMA12 Masters had a wider staging, better layering & presentation and vocals were more engaging in everyway possible (AKM4490 is coloured in vocals).

I would honestly buy the CMA12 Masters over the CMA15 unless you need the analogue in/LDAC bluetooth.
Great comparison to the Twelve! Thanks!


500+ Head-Fier
Pros: All-in-one
Decent size footprint for desktops
Strong macrodynamics
Motorized volume pot
Cons: No balanced input
SE input is second class
Gain switches (iem v. headphone use) inconvenient location

First off, I'd like to thank Questyle for giving us HF'ers an opportunity to try out their latest amp/dac offering, the CMA 15 pictured above. They did not pay me nor provided any input for this review. All thoughts about this unit are mine alone.

So, let's start things off with what's included in the package. Out of the shipping box, the CMA 15 is enclosed in a rather spartan white cardboard box. A 5ft power cable, a remote, instructions, and other paperwork were included as well. I was surprised that two AAA batteries for the remote were missing from the package. Not a big deal since I already had some readily available, but one would expect some to be included here nonetheless.

The casing for the unit is metal, which is finished in a way that makes it somewhat of a fingerprint magnet (see photo above). I couldn't help but contribute a few additional fingerprints of my own to those that were already there when I took the unit out of its box. The volume control is motorized, which means that it displays more travel resistance than the cheap volume pots used in the THX AAA 789. Thankfully, the travel resistance of the CMA 15 is just smidge higher than the Alps Blue pot found in my passive preamp. In other words, the CMA 15's volume pot feels fine, it is smooth (not stepped), and motorized too. I mostly controlled the volume via the included the remote. Of course, any fine volume adjustments needed to made by hand.

Amps that I evaluated here:
Musicbee (FLAC) > SPDIF optical > CMA 15 (bias control set to High) > LCD-3, HEKv1, or HE-6
Musicbee (FLAC) > SPDIF optical > CMA 15 (DAC mode / fixed) > THX AAA 789 > LCD-3 or HE-6
Musicbee (FLAC) > Bifrost 2 (unison USB) > passive preamp > Bryston 3BST > HE-6

I also tested feeding the analog signal from my Bifrost 2 into the CMA 15 via the latter's SE input, a first for Questyle from what I gathered. This testing was short-lived because the sound from the Bifrost 2 sounded a bit grainy when fed into the CMA 15, something that I didn't perceive when feeding my Darkvoice with the Bifrost 2's SE output using the same cable. My initial impression is that the SE input of the CMA 15 is second class to the CMA 15's digital inputs. I feel that Questyle, again, designed the CMA 15 to be used as an amp/dac combo, which I don't mind since the CMA 15 amp/dac sounds pretty good. I will be interested in reading impressions from subsequent reviewers of this tour regarding this feature.

I didn't test the CMA 15's bluetooth feature nor its MQA or DSD decoding capabilities. Also, I didn't test the CMA 15 with any IEMs. There are gain switches underneath the unit for iems and headphones. I'm sure that people would appreciate if such switches are presented in the front or in the rear of the amp. It is quite inconvenient to lift the CMA 15 up and toggle the gain switches when switching from iems to headphones (and vice versa). To me, I do not really care too much since I'm mostly a headphone user.

As for the sound of the CMA 15, I describe as being neutral with a slightly bright tilt (edit: I'm coming from a BF2 + Liquid Platinum | LAuX, so a warmer setup). I will compare it to the THX AAA 789 since I believe a lot of people here are familiar with the character of the 789 and amps of its ilk. Bass impact (i.e. slam) is noticeably strong with the CMA 15, considerably more so than the 789. The 789's slam sounded dull and mushy compared to the CMA 15. This difference is most apparent on the opening bars of "Protection" from Massive Attack on my LCD-3's. Also, the 789 sounded more closed-in, congested, which meant that imaging was far better with the CMA 15. To my ears, the 789 has a nasty habit of overly sharpening the edges of notes, which makes it sound a bit cold and unnatural. Thankfully, notes on the CMA 15 sounded a bit more rounded and fuller, and thus more natural, in my experience. Overall, the CMA 15 presents a clean and spacious sound with wonderful macrodynamics.

I really enjoyed listening to my LCD-3 and HEKv1 through the CMA 15. The HEKv1 is known for its soft character and the CMA 15 provides it some of the macrodynamics that it lacks on most other amplifiers (power amps help alleviate this issue with the HEKv1 but that's a whole 'nother kettle of fish). However, the CMA 15 came second best to the 3BST when it came to driving my HE-6 (modded 4-screw). To my ears, it was interesting that the 789 performance was not far from the CMA 15's when it came to driving this monster can. The increased bass impact from the CMA 15 with the LCD-3 and HEKv1 was a bit more muted when driving the HE-6. I noticed the size of the image increasing when going from the 789 to the CMA 15 and then to the 3BST. The slight bright tilt from the CMA 15 came to the fore with the HE-6's, whereas the 3BST+BF2 combo exhibited better control and sounded far more spacious than the other two amps. This spaciousness might reflect the character from the BF2, which I noticed exhibited more soundstage depth than the CMA 15's ESS DAC when switching back and forth between the two sources using the CMA 15's remote during my brief testing of the BF2 with the CMA 15 (see above).

Overall, I think the CMA 15 is a nice all-in-one unit that synergizes well with planar cans and offers a lot of convenient features.
Last edited: