JUZEAR 41T

SherryLion

New Head-Fier
Neutral sounds pleasant! The JUZEAR 41T
Pros: 1. Neutral sounding
2. Smooth and pleasant sounding
3. Controlled bass
4. Open sounding mid range
5. Clear treble
Cons: 1. Lack of clarity
2. Bass texture

Review OF The JUZEAR 41T


IMG_0616.jpeg


Introduction


Jiangyin created the independent brand JUZEAR series. Its goal is to become the product that burning friends prefer. Workmanship, materials, listening ability, and cost performance are all making an effort to keep up with the times regretlessly and move forward without losing sight of the original purpose. And today I'll be reviewing The JUZEAR 41T, one of their first IEMs, but before I do that, let's talk about a few other things.

IMG_0613.jpeg


Disclaimer


*This is a review unit, courtesy of Concept Kart. All thanks to them for providing. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as "41T."
*I am using different Ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the 41T based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification


A multi-driver design, consisting of 4 balanced armature and 1 dynamic driver, is housed in the 41T. The low frequency is handled by the dynamic driver, while the mid and high frequencies are handled by the balanced armature drivers. With the exception of their company emblem and a design on the faceplate, the shells are composed of resin that was 3D printed and seem transparent. The iems are compact and well-built. Thanks to the 41T's ergonomic design, it fits nicely in my ears and feels pleasant to wear for extended periods of time. High-quality 6N OFC silver-plated cable with 2 pin connectors and a 3.5mm termination connection are included with the cable 41T. A carrying bag, earmuffs, and two different types of eartips in varied sizes are included among the other extras. In terms of the technical details, the sensitivity is 112dB, and the impedance is 48 Ohms. The overall harmonic distortion is less than 1.4%, and the frequency response ranges from 20Hz to 20kHz.

IMG_0624.jpeg


Sound


The hybrid configured IEMs, which frequently have BA's and DDs, have significantly hit the sweet spot for audiophiles, according to everything I have observed over the past few years, especially with the tonality. Of course, I'm not talking about Planar. The Soundrhyme SR5 and the IEM I am examining, the 41T, are two examples of it. The balanced sound characteristic of this IEM also has a forward mid range and a very tastefully executed sub bass boost. Both the SR5 and the 41T sound amazing when it comes to sound, however the 41T focuses more on sounding neutral while the SR5 has a warmer tone. This is done to appeal to two distinct groups. The tone and consistency of the sound are so perfectly kept that I cannot argue the 41T's absence of harsh and edgy notes. The 41T sounds extremely clean but not refined, and I would not expect it to. Due to the excellent tonal balance, it is quite dependable as it doesn't sound tiring, even if the signature has a tendency to sound rather neutral. Although the treble is broad and airy, it doesn't seem intense or thrust details in your face. The mid range, which I believe to be quite vibrant and open sounding, is the most active section of the mix. The bass strikes the mark and contributes the mix's cleanest and most controlled blows. I can confidently predict that our audiophile community will welcome them if they are given a chance. Let's explore sound more thoroughly.

IMG_0617.jpeg


Treble


Don't get me wrong; the Monarch MKII's presentation of the sound is very different from the 41T's, but the tonality is similar, as evidenced by how the notes sound and how well they fit into the mix. However, in my opinion, the upper higher frequencies on the Monarch MKII are more revealing than they are on the 41T.Without even a touch of sibilance in the mix, the treble of the 41T sounds light, spacious, and elegant. I won't say the treble is dark, but if you want bright, neutral sound, it can give you that impression.The overall tuning is safe, which results in a neutral-sounding treble. Due to the fact that they don't frequently break or distort when spread out throughout the upper frequencies, the vocals and instruments in the upper frequencies seem clear and expansive. While listening to metal/rock or classical music, the vocalists and instruments sound nice and distinct enough in the mix, but the treble's glittering quality is insufficient. They perform perfectly well, although they could have been more exposing. While maintaining note weight, the lower treble sounds more upfront, with the vocalists and instruments being more revealing, clear, and detailed. Although they don't sound slender, I do think they're light. which I think provides sufficient energy. The treble region performs overall in a slick, clear, and secure manner.

Mid Range


This is why I termed it a balanced sounding IEM. I would love a mid range where the vocals come across as front to make it appear the center of the mix and doesn't go overboard and make it sound overly mid centric. I'm not sure why it keeps sounding like the Monarch MKII, despite the fact that the reaction is objectively a little different, such as how the voices are interpreted and how the instruments complement one another. The mid range is among the best in the mid-fi class; perhaps those who want a thick or extremely revealing sound won't agree, but it is the ideal compromise between the two. The voices and instruments are the clearest and liveliest in the upper mid range, which is the most energizing section in the entire mix. Of course, it doesn't sound very crisp or detailed, but the sound is so promising that 41T had me humming all day. The instruments complement the voices with a more genuine timbre and authenticity, which makes them seem warm and friendly. It's amazing to hear how pure and melodic the music is. The lower midrange, on the other hand, has the proper amount of warmth that permeates the upper frequencies. Although the singers and instruments sound hazy in the lower mid range, it is easy to distinguish them. Even if they preserve the hefty characteristic sound fantastic, they don't seem particularly shaky and muttering. The bass guitar sounds perfect, neither too thick and rich nor understated and thin. Thanks to the warmth being compensated for by the mid bass spill into the lower mid range, the overall sound is kept safe. The mid range responds with a generally melodic, open, and enjoyable sound.

Bass


Regarding the bass, it is quite well tuned and has a strong enough mid- and subbass presence. The sub bass section of the bass is highlighted, which gives the overall effect of making the bass punchier and more rumbling. The bass is the cleanest I've heard it in this area, which increases my level of engagement since it still pounds and keeps the thrill flowing despite the tight control. The sub bass extension is quite deep, which aids in creating a gentle rumbling in the ear canal. The limits are disregarded as the blows land forcefully. The punches are more elusive than the slams, thus the mid bass still sounds smashing and boomy but is restrained. Because of the quality of the bass, which sounds clear and resolves swiftly, the smashes don't come out as being very energetic or accented. One of the greatest bass textures and details you can find at this pricing bracket. This answer has better details and control than the TRI Starsea and Seeaudio Yume, in a way. The bass region's overall performance is slick, under control, and has substantial effects.

Technical Performance


When it comes to technical performance, IEMs that are close to the 41T's price range are quite competitive. Although technically excellent, the 41T is not the greatest model available. Similar to the SR5, they do not sound overly sophisticated but provide an overall strong presentation. The separation is distinct and far away, and the image is clear, just as the stage is broad enough. The resolution is good, allowing for enough detail retrievals, and the speed of resolution is swift.

IMG_0619.jpeg


Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation


Although the stage seems as though it is situated on a flat plane and the soundstage is broad enough to sound spacious and open, the depth is not nearly as favorably received. Although the image is decent, it might have been better due to the lack of clarity. On the other hand, the separation is distinct and far enough away to give the components room to breathe and sound distinctive from one another. Though it is not very sophisticated, it works because it is simple to identify the source of the sound.

Speed & Resolution


Although the tiny details aren't extremely revealing, the resolution is adequate to bring out the excellent nuances. Note's attack and decay are swift, which makes it superior to its rivals.

Sound Impressions


Sources


Tempotec V6 - With the V6, the sound was clearer and more detailed when listening to the 41T. As the treble became clearer, it occasionally embraced sharp notes. The mid range had a similar sound with the exception that it was more polished. The rumbling sensation grew more intense but the bass seemed more under control. The technical aspect felt the same, with the exception of the staging and resolution, which were increased. I was delighted with the coupling with the V6.

IMG_0614.jpeg


iFi Hipdac - The hipdac was used to listen to the 41T, and all of a sudden, repressed resolution and details were apparent. While the mid range sounded the same overall with the exception of the voices, the treble was more dense and less airy. The bass was louder and more thumping. Overall technical performance declined. Consequently, the combination with the hipdac wasn't enjoyable.

IMG_0615.jpeg


Tracks Used


Luna Haruna - Glory days
Luna Haruna - Overfly
Rokudenashi - The Flame of Love
LMYK - 0 (zero)
ORESKABAND - Jitensya
Marina Horiuchi - Mizukagami no Sekai
RADWIMPS - Suzume
Indila - Love Story
Indila - Tourner dans le vide
Earth, Wind & Fire - September
Tom Petty - Free Fallin'
Fleetwood Mac - Everywhere
Nirvana - Smells Like Teen Spirit
Blue Oyester Cult - (Don't Fear) The Reaper
Guns 'N' Roses - Sweet Child O' Mine
The Police - Every Breath You Take
Gojira - Amazonia
TV on the radio - Wolf Like Me
Bring Me To The Horizon - Can You Feel My Heart
Bring Me To The Horizon - sTraNgeRs
Avril Lavigne - Dare To Love Me
Travis - Love Will Come Through
Gotye - Somebody That I Used To Know
DJ Shadows - Six Days (Remix) [feat. Mos Def]
Lady Gaga - Just Dance
Lil Wayne - Lollipop
Flo Rida - Low
Sebastian Lopez & Flug - Electronic Measures
Federico Mecozzi - Blue (Da Ba Dee)
Wayve - Not Enough
Kai Wachi & TeZATalks - Ghost
NGHTMRE, Zeds Dead & Tori Levett - Shady Intentions
Zeds Dead, DNMO & GG Magree - Save My Grave
Skrillex, Noisia, josh pan & Dylan Brady - Supersonic
Skrillex & Nai Barghouti - Xena
Skrillex, Missy Elliott & Mr. Oizo - RATATA
Kaifi Khalil, Eva B & Wahab Bugti - Kana Yaari
A.R. Rahman, Javed Ali & Mohit Chauhan - Kun Faya Kun

Conclusion


I have listened to various IEMs in this price range, and they often have different sound delivery methods. The sole signature that the 41T creates that really captures my attention is its neutral, clean, accurate, and smooth sound with sub bass presentation. This is definitely one of the secure IEMs that provides the needed neutral image, in my opinion. Thus, I can without a doubt suggest JUZEAR 41T, or at the at least, give them a try. You'll be amazed by their simplicity and distinctive sound.

IMG_0621.jpeg
Hark01
Hark01
What is the nozzle size?
CT007
CT007
If its got less detail than Performer 5, it doesn't have enough, IMO.
  • Like
Reactions: Hark01
Back
Top