Vorwort:
Ergonomisch geformtes, offenes, 3D-gedrucktes Gehäuse und ein Balanced Armature Treiber je Seite – die Rede ist vom HeyGears Anora.
Was der sehr preislich sehr konkurrenzfähig gestaltete In-Ear klanglich zu bieten hat und wie er im Vergleich zu meinem SoundMAGIC PL50 und dem Brainwavz B150 abschneidet, kläre ich in dieser nun folgenden englischsprachigen Rezension.
Ergonomisch geformtes, offenes, 3D-gedrucktes Gehäuse und ein Balanced Armature Treiber je Seite – die Rede ist vom HeyGears Anora.
Was der sehr preislich sehr konkurrenzfähig gestaltete In-Ear klanglich zu bieten hat und wie er im Vergleich zu meinem SoundMAGIC PL50 und dem Brainwavz B150 abschneidet, kläre ich in dieser nun folgenden englischsprachigen Rezension.
Introduction:
I won’t bother you with too much introduction and general blah-blah and will mainly focus on writing about the sound – why? Because nobody really reads the rest anyway – at least I know that I don’t.
Anyway, since HeyGears is probably not a company name that many of you know, I guess I shall write at least a few lines about them in this introduction.
Allegedly founded in 2015 and based in Guangzhou, China, they have released a couple wireless in-ears.
HeyGears’ seemingly only non-wireless in-ear at this time is the Anora, the in-ear that this very review will be about. It’s a competitively single-BA in-ear with 3D-printed shells, which on its own isn’t too unique nowadays, just like the fact that the ergonomic shell design is based on ear scans of allegedly several thousand pairs of ears. What makes it unique though is that its shells that are made of resin and available in three different colours are obviously open and printed with several diamond-shaped openings in them, which I personally think looks both unique and beautiful.
What the HeyGears Anora sounds like and how it performs, also in comparison with two other single-BA in-ears (my SoundMAGIC PL50 and the Brainwavz B150) is what I will find out in this very review.
Full disclosure: Lend Me UR ears sent me an e-mail, asking if I would like to review their Alpha & Delta D6, which I didn’t. However, I was interested in the HeyGears Anora and I subsequently got a sample sent to me free of charge, for review purpose.
As always, my words written above and below remain nonetheless true, unbiased, honest and written without any guidelines or requirements for the review, no matter how it would turn out.
Technical Specifications:
Price: ~ $63 (Lend Me UR ears)
Type: In-Ears
Type of Driver: Balanced Armature
Drivers per Side: 1
Frequency Range: 20 – 20000 Hz
Sensitivity (@ 1 kHz): 108.5 dB (+/-3 dB)
Impedance (@ 1 kHz): 46 Ohms (+/-15%)
Maximum SPL: 125 dB
Passive Noise Isolation: 35 dB
Available Colours: 3 (Deep Black, Rose Gold, Ceramic White)
Weight (Earphones): 18.8 g
Cable: 1.2 m, permanently attached, 3-button remote control w/ mic
Delivery Content:
One really doesn’t get much inside the plastic box – the in-ears, three pairs of silicone tips and a cleaning brush. That’s it.
What’s lacking is a storage case/pouch. Nicely enough though, if you care for that, the package design itself is stylish.
Looks, Feels, Build Quality:
I think that most people would agree that the Anora looks simply great. Its shells are 3D-printed and the grid-like printing as well as styling and its finish appears to be of very high quality – and it doesn’t feel soft but very sturdy and well-made.
Although the shells are on the larger side, much of what is inside is just air – the BA driver is encased in a small enclosure. Wasted space? I think not since it contributes to the Anora’s unique looks.
The cable is only okay at best – it features reasonable strain relief implementation but isn’t as flexible as it could be. Furthermore, it lacks a chin-slider.
While it has got a built-in three-button remote control, the buttons aren’t easy to distinguish despite small tactile dots on the volume control buttons.
Comfort, Isolation:
The ergonomically shaped shells are on the larger size, as I have already mentioned. As someone with quite large ears, I have to say that the Anora fits me perfectly and sits very comfortably, which I didn’t expect since its nozzle looks quite short, nonetheless there is no seal, comfort or fit issue.
Since the cable is intended to be worn down and not very flexible, microphonics are unfortunately quite high. The lack of a chin-slider also contributes to that.
Inserting the in-ear pieces normally and then guiding the cable around the ears is nonetheless possible (although the mic/remote is then in an inconvenient spot) and almost completely reduces microphonics – so this is the way to go, at least for me.
The included silicone tips appear similar to the ones known as “Sony Hybrid”, and typically for them, they provide quite strong sucky sucky (but not for five dolla [sic]).
Noise isolation is on a high level – which is thanks to the Anora being a fully closed single-BA in-ear (all the 3D-printed mesh grid design is just for show and ergonomics).
Sound:
My main sources for listening were my iBasso DX90, my Apple iPod Nano 7G and the Cowon Plenue 2.
I only used the largest included tips for listening.
Tonality:
The Anora heads into a more neutral direction but isn’t as flat as an Etymotic ER4SR/S or ER3SE, but more comparable to the ER4XR/ER3XR with added upper treble energy.
And indeed, in the lows the Anora appears quite comparable to the ER3XR, sporting ca. 5-6 dB more in quantity compared to the ER4SR/S that is tuned for a diffuse-field flat bass, although the Anora has got a slightly fuller lower midrange in comparison to the ER3XR and slightly less true sub-bass levels. Nonetheless the Anora can reproduce sub-bass notes – but with neutral levels, so it’s not an engaging but a rather flat, neutrality-oriented bass response. On the whole, the Anora’s bass response and implementation is also quite comparable to that of the InEar StageDiver SD-2 or HiFiMan RE400.
Mids are neither forward nor recessed and have got good balance and sound realistic. Lower mids are slightly lifted so that the Anora doesn’t sound thin but doesn’t lack a pinch of warmth either, and due to a very slight 3 kHz lift, higher voices and their overtones aren’t lacking in the mix either and reproduced mostly neutral.
High female vocals are slightly more nasal due to the 3 kHz lift, but it’s nothing dramatic.
Around 5 kHz, the Anora showcases an even dip that creates a quite easy-going listening experience and generates headroom for an emphasis that is located around 8.5 kHz and highlights cymbals a bit without adding any sibilance or making them appear unrealistic – they just gain a bit more presence in the mix.
Super treble extension past 10 kHz is surprisingly good and the Anora passes 14 kHz without any issues but is audibly quieter around 15 kHz (which isn’t relevant anymore anyway).
- - -
So all in all, one could say that the Anora takes on a slightly v-shaped approach of neutrality with a pinch of warmth.
Resolution:
Resolution is pretty good for a single-BA in-ear but overall I would characterise the Anora as 2nd-tier and put it behind the likes of Etymotic’s ER3-/ER4-line or some other single-BA in-ears that come very close to that.
Speech intelligibility and midrange details are, not all that much surprisingly, on a high level and rendered quite easily but also 2nd-tier.
Bass speed and tightness are, which is no real surprise either, on a high level as well, and noticeably higher than what most dynamic driver in-ears are capable of. For BA standards, the lows are however still just a tad on the softer side, without control issues. Tightness is therefore slightly behind the old ER-4S while the Anora also clearly avoids the SD-2’s softness.
The sub-bass appears to have a bit less definition than the midbass although it is superior to the EARNiNE EN120’s sub-bass quality.
Highs are separated well, however they appear a little less detailed than the rest and a bit grainy in comparison.
Soundstage:
The Anora has got a soundstage that is quite average, if not even a little on the smaller side, but circular with similar width as well as depth to my ears. Separation and layering appear good albeit a bit behind Etymotic-levels.
---------
In Comparison with other Single-BA In-Ears:
SoundMAGIC PL50:
Neither has a great cable but SoundMAGIC’s has at least got a chin-slider. While the Anora doesn’t come with any storage solution, at least a pleather bag is included with the PL50.
Both in-ears have got a quite similar bass implementation with the Anora being just slightly more forward by ca. 1 dB.
Mids are a bit louder in the mix on the PL50 and generally slightly on the darker side whereas the Anora features upper mids that are slightly on the accentuated side.
Both in-ears are more on the relaxed side around 5 kHz, the PL50 probably even a tad more.
Where they really differ is the upper treble where the Anora is brighter and more vivid compared to the SoundMAGIC that is heading into a darker direction in the highs.
Resolution is quite comparable – the Anora features the minimally tighter bass attack while decay and control are quite comparable.
Midrange details are ultimately a draw with just a slightly different tonal approach (slightly dark vs slightly bright).
Treble details are where the PL50 is a bit ahead compared to the Anora that appears a bit grainy here.
The PL50’s spatial presentation is larger and more spacious, especially with more width while the depth appears to be similar. Thanks to the greater width though, the SoundMAGIC has got an advantage when it comes to separation.
Brainwavz B150:
The Brainwavz’ cable doesn’t lack a chin-slider, as opposed to the Anora’s. And the B150 comes with a proper carrying case whereas HeayGears’ in-ear doesn’t.
The Brainwavz is an in-ear that is tuned for a fuller and warmer sound in the lows and root and has therefore got more punch and fullness than the Anora. However, the B150 rolls off stronger towards the real sub-bass, so it provides more of a midbassy presentation whereas the HeyGears has got a more even bass distribution.
Lower mids on the Brainwavz are more present and fuller than on the Anora but without appearing unrealistic. Upper mids on the Anora have got a little more brightness. Mids in general have got equal presence in the mix on both in-ears though.
The Anora is tuned for a brighter, more vivid upper treble response compared to the B150 that is on the slightly darker side here.
Bass attack appears slightly tighter and faster on the Anora while decay is quite similar, which also goes for the control. However, while the B150 has got less sub-bass quantity, it shows more definition here.
Although the Anora is tuned for a less warm and brighter midrange compared to the Brainwavz, which also goes for the treble, it is actually the B150 that appears to be a bit more resolving in general, which is also noticeable in the treble that has some grain on the Anora.
The B150’s stage showcases a bit more width and depth than the Anora’s, along with the slightly cleaner instrument separation.
Conclusion:
Design-wise, the Anora is a very stylish, beautiful and unique product with well-built shells and good ergonomics (however rather large ears are recommended) as well as a well-balanced sound signature.
Detail retrieval is also pretty good, although the real sub-bass could show a little more definition with tracks that go this low, and the treble sometimes shows some grain and could be a tad more detailed. On the whole though, the Anora is a single-BA in-ear whose technical presentation fits well to its price range (nonetheless it’s rather 2nd-tier compared to some very good sub-$100 single-BA models or Etymotic’s single-BA in-ears).
What’s not so nice is that the Anora’s cable is only average at best, lacks a chin-slider, has got remote control buttons that aren’t that well distinguishable from each other, and that it doesn’t come with a carrying case/pouch even though it is standard at this price point.