Beyerdynamic DT900 ProX
I have tried to get over the new toy syndrome before I am writing this, but that feeling has not been easy to get out of the system after unboxing the DT900 Pro X. I think though, that I have reached some sort of conclusion on the DT900. I bought them in the beginning of December and they arrived in the first days of January after some weeks stock-shortage from the european dealers.
My first WOW-moment was the velour-pads on the DT900. They are probably the most comfortable pads in any headphone I have had so far. Everything about the DT900 is just top quality. A real workhorse meant to be transported and used for years. Every part can be replaced easily, cable, cushions and headband. I really like that.
The design totally won me over right the first look after opening the box. The black theme and the grills with unobtrusive DT 900 Pro X embossed in black is cool. It is sleek and robust. No quirky sounds when moving the cups AT ALL! Just pure softness when wearing them on the head.
There are two cables provided in the box a long (3 m) and shorter (1,8m) cable with standard xlr connection in one end and mini-jack (+converter to normal size) in the other. The shorter cable is perfect for using them sitting at my desk and listening from my laptop. No balanced cable option included though.
Every headphone-maker in the world should just go ahead and copy these cables when it comes to convenience. They are tangle-free, they are not stiff, they feel just right and light. If all headphone companies in the world could make their cables like the ones that come with the DT900 ProX there would be no more talks about irritating cables. (I am looking at you Grado!) Very flexible, they do not tangle, they are thin and light.
Sound
I thought for a while, that I would be writing a longer review of the DT900 Pro X and compare it to DT1770, which I have had for some years and which I really enjoy. But I can see now, that it really does not make any sense for me to compare the two. They are both very good headphones and they both serve different purposes.
I can't really say which one I like best right now. But for longer listening sessions the DT1770 probably wins. I really did not expect this. I bought the DT900 to be an everyday headphone for longer sessions while working in my home-office. At home I have no need for closed sound isolation and my Grado’s can only sit on my ears for a shorter time before the ear-pain kicks in. So, why did I purchase a studio-headphone made for professional use? The reason for that is that I have always liked the less fun, more analytical, brighter, airy and open sounding headphones. I have always found that Beyerdynamic was the best in this area and I hopes DT900 would give me that again - and I was not disappointed.
I have never really lusted for headphones with too much bass-impact. As long as it is tight and punchy when needed, that is all I ask for. Etymotic ER4XR has been my favorite IEM’s for years and now replaced by the Etymotic EVO’s. The DT1770 has been my reference for full-size headphones. Some people say the DT1770 have lots of bass, I would place them in the middle of the road and to me they are the reference and neutral sound to aim for. I even prefer the older e-series Grado’s over the new x-series drivers because they are brighter and have less bass.
Even though I like a bright sounding headphone the most important to me is that it sounds open. That the resolution is good. That the midrange is clean and that the treble adds an edge and crispness to the sound. The DT900 totally delivers on those parameters. They are open, clear, not too dark or too bright. I find them very close to the DT1770 in terms of color and I could also place DT900 in the middle of the road soundwise. Well done Beyerdynamic! I was afraid that the darker sound from the T1.3 and T5.3 would be the new “house sound” direction from Beyerdynamic, but I am so pleased to hear that they are back where they belong with DT900.
The only negative thing I can say about the DT900, is that even after several weeks of playing and break-in, DT900 has a tendency to give me listening fatigue with some bad recordings. The treble can be magic with some recordings but can also pierce my ears with other recordings. The DT1770 is more forgiving and sounds better all over while it does not reach the airy and forward treble bliss, that I really like with DT900. So, DT900 are picky and that is what a good studio headphone should be.
Compared to DT1770, The DT900 has a little bit bigger soundstage and are more open sounding. DT1770 has a naturalness and adds some body to vocals where DT900 can’t fully compete but they are close. Definitely more treble energy in DT900 than DT1770. Can you compare a closed design with an open design in terms of sound? I a not sure it is fair but if DT700 Pro X sounds anything like DT900 Pro X then they are VERY much worth trying.
I have enjoyed the DT1770 for years but there is some extra fun (I didn't expect that from a "studio" headphone) with DT900. They are really dynamic and punchy and crispy with a nice open treble presence.
The best thing is that they are so versatile in terms of source. With their new 48 Ohm driver, they play well directly from my laptop and even with the lightning to minijack LOD from my iPhone, DT900 sounds open, transparent and punchy. If I use one of my amplifiers for instance the EarMen TR-Amp the bass tightens up and the layering and instrument placement in the soundstage becomes even more clear so, they also scale to some extend with better chain.
All in all, the DT900 Pro X has been a super positive surprise. I think they are cheap for what you get here. This could be one of the best sound/price ratio headphones currently on the market.
I have used the following playlist while listening to Beyerdynamic DT900 Pro X:
I have been using it directly from my iPhone with the apple lightning to jack, my Macbook Pro headphone out, from the EarMen TR-Amp and from my Meier Classic ff. I played streamed music from either Apple Music or CD’s.