Reviews by purrin

purrin

aka Marvey, purr1n
Member of the Trade: Eddie Current
Pros: Super comfy
Cons: Too exciting for my tastes, mid suckout, spotlit treble, too expensive, ugly
goropeza
goropeza
Ugly is relative. The man is just giving his opinion.
catspaw
catspaw
I listened to these and i thought they were a touch better than my Hifiman HE-400, especially in terms of soundstage, but apart from that I found them relatively similar in sound quality (assuming I can amp the HE-400).
In Poland the prices are rather similar in those, so I would not be surprised at all if some preffered the HD700.
sarang-i
sarang-i
I can't agree with purrin's opinion more.
That's what i experienced with hd700.

purrin

aka Marvey, purr1n
Member of the Trade: Eddie Current
Pros: It works
Cons: Does so many things wrong
I found this DAC kind of meh. $699 (currently on $669 special) is sort of no-mans land is terms of DACs. It's admirable that Matrix put out something at this price point - especially balanced outputs. In terms of my expectations at $699, I wouldn't expect the utmost resolution, but I would at least want something that doesn't do anything terribly wrong. 
 
The impressions below are from the balanced outputs (I think it's fair that this review focus on that, after all, this is a balanced out DAC.) The amp used was an Eddie Current Balancing Act with 7N7 NU tall bottle driver and EML solid-plate 300Bs. Headphones were HD800. Interface was USB from PC with J River.
 
Tonally, this DAC is fairly neutral and doesn't have anything wonky in the FR. That is good. However this DAC makes too many mistakes (and the extent of these mistakes are signficant, not minor.):
 
1. Lacks macro-dynamics. Very serious problem. Can't capture the roar of large symphonic works. (major)
 
2. Flat sounding - not able to pull of those little instantaneous dynamic contrasts which bring immediacy to reproduced sounds. (moderate)
 
3. Muddy bass. (major)
 
4. Slow sounding with poor transient speed or late transients. (moderate)
 
5. Lacks air. (minor)
 
6. Treble harshness / glare (minor)
 
7. Lacks deepest bass (can be overlooked at price)
 
You are better off with an AMB Gamma 2 (used or built by MisterX) or Schitt Bifrost. If you want to spend  $50 more, get the upcoming Schitt balanced DAC (if you need balanced). These three DACs I just mentioned aren't perfect either, but they don't do so many things so wrong to such a large extent.
 
I really like Tam at tamaudio (I loved the Matrix M-stage amp), but I just can't recommend this to any of my friends if they were looking for a ~$700 DAC.
 
Two Stars = Needs Improvement (I never give A grades / five stars to equipment.)
Two and Half Stars for the SE output (which does sound better than the balanced outs.)
 
-Pur
 

purrin

aka Marvey, purr1n
Member of the Trade: Eddie Current
Pros: It's OK
Cons: Poor value
 
 
[size=11.0pt]EXECUTIVE SUMMARY[/size]
 
[size=11.0pt]1.      Not coherent throughout the audio band:[/size]
[size=11.0pt]a. Overall neutral, but but but[/size]
[size=11.0pt]b. [/size][size=11.0pt]What’s up with the peaks in the upper mids/lower treble?*[/size]
[size=11.0pt]c. Little bit bloated in the bass[/size]
[size=11pt]d. Bass not keeping up with the mids/treble[/size]
[size=11.0pt]2.      Little bullet design = comfort/fit that blows monkey chucks[/size]
[size=11.0pt]3.      Mid-fi resolution[/size]
[size=11.0pt]4.      Aren't IEMs supposed to isolate?[/size]
 
[size=11pt]Significant sonic issues indicated in red.[/size]
 
 
* Pop and rock do not sound good. However your results may be better with classical or music with acoustic instruments.
  • Like
Reactions: Kunlun and altrunox
Aero Dynamik
Aero Dynamik
I tried the AKG K3003 for a couple of hours today (with my CLAS -db + ALO Rx MK3-B + Media Center 18 with FLACs) and was deeply, deeply impressed. In many ways the greatest IEM/sonic experience I've ever had (have the EarSonics SM3, EarSonics custom EM6 and Sennheiser HD 650). When told the price (9950 Swedish kroner = 1550 USD) I swallowed, but to me it didn't affect the sound quality. I was, lo and behold, still deeply impressed. I'm not sure it is excessively expensive compared to what you get (soundwise), but to me personally it is just too much money, so I didn't buy it.

agooh
agooh
how about you write a review about yggy ? many headfiers' will be happy to see the first 5 star from you  XD
Zombie_X
Zombie_X
Great review and is pretty much spot on with what I experienced with this IEM. Yes the IEM is pure crap, heck the SE-535 is better overall

purrin

aka Marvey, purr1n
Member of the Trade: Eddie Current
Pros: Kinda of OK - there are much worse out there
Cons: Too much bass, treble is an assault upon my ears
Too much bass, strident treble. I guess it could be worse. Midrange is not bad. It might sound OK straight out of my out of my cheap Android phone which lacks power and sounds kind of muddy.
 
The treble hurts me. I wouldn't keep them though, even if someone gave them to me for free. I wouldn't give them to my kids either because I don't want to destroy their high frequency hearing.
 
Really ugly too.
Anaxilus
Anaxilus
I'm pretty sure they wanted to improve the sound. That's what the aluminum cups and especially the damping foam is there for in the Amperiorioriori. Obviously source chains do have an affect on the extreme to which one might hear one part of the spectrum versus another.
scuttle
scuttle
If there's too much treble for your tastes, why not use EQ???
lumberjake
lumberjake
Had the M80s. They were actually quite nice with pretty decent mids, bass that was not overwhelming but had good impact and treble that was never harsh but perhaps a bit recessed. I found them to have decent soundstage too compared to these but they didn't seal out noise as well. However, for the money, the Soundmagic HP 100 mops the floor with both, its on another level. If you don't mind rocking big shiny cups but oh that bass.
Back
Top