Reviews by Psalmanazar

Psalmanazar

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Liquid smooth and grain free. Zero clamping force.
Cons: Headbanging is impossible.
I was very excited to try the LCD-4 after hearing about the improvements to the sound Audeze has made and reports that it is the best of the line yet.
 
Comfort:
The headband is great and clamp-free for those that despise clamp. However the cups are still very heavy and I feel it needs a tiny bit of clamp to not be in danger of falling off my head should I stand up or reach over to change the volume. Of course headbanging is impossible.

Bass:
Very smooth and well extended. Perhaps the smoothest I've ever heard. Smoother than the slicked up floor of a surgical ward. So smooth that it lacks texture and especially impact. The lack of impact compared to almost all other Audeze headphones and dynamic driver cans is huge. The LCD-4 never boxes your ears. Slayer and Suffocation were so laid back, my brain was never in danger of being caught in a brutal mosh pit between the cups of the LCD-4. You know how Shure claims to have "liquid mids"? The LCD-4 has liquid bass.

Mids:
Once again super-smooth and grain free. A pleasant improvement over the other Fazors which can be somewhat grainy. The upper mids are recessed but clean, the Audeze house sound.

Treble:
The treble is vanquished. The LCD4 succeeds in pleasantly rendering the brutal cymbals of Blasphemy's Fallen Angel of Doom and the ultra-clipped snare samples of modern hip hop. Unfortunately, the metallic percussion of Philip Glass and the Kronos Quartet was presented as tiny bits of distortion above the other instruments rather than cymbals, snares, triangles.

Audio Quality: 5/10 The LCD-4 is good at what it does.
Comfort: 7/10 Comfortable but needs to be more secure on the head.
Design: 5/10 Audeze clearly meant for the LCD-4 to fit and sound like this.
Value: 2/10 If you can afford the LCD-4, it has its place.

Conclusion:
The smoothest ever. I prefer the LCD-X myself as it's a bit livelier but the LCD-4 has its place. The LCD-4 is recommended for those who do not wish to deal with any potentially unpleasant viscerality from their chosen recordings.
glassmonkey
glassmonkey
I heard the LCD4 out of the Questyle CMA600i and feel this reviewers comments are accurate. I found it lacking in lower end detail, and that the treble just disappeared on Hotel California. I really disliked the sound, but I'm open to a new listen on different equipment. Since the CMA600i is very neutral and has about 2W of power, it should be able to drive these and show what they really sound like, but maybe it doesn't. I just know that the Ethers on was awesome and the oBravo EAMT-3A ($2000) IEM sounded way way way, I can keep going, way better. 
grizzlybeast
grizzlybeast
whoah this has the exact opposite of what I treasure most. What a pity. LCD-X is prob the most 'visceral' in the line up then. 
Gamergtx260
Gamergtx260
I understand everyone is entitled to their opinions and heres mine, I totally disagree. Seems like it was written after a 5 min listen without giving details on the setup and maybe he likes a more neutral headphone. 

Psalmanazar

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Nil
Cons: Sound, comfort, fit, weight, price.
The Flare Audio R1's cups are made of metal. The shiny and chrome circles can be polished clean and gleam in the light. Sliding freely along two nails, they must be pressed against your ears for the headphone does not clamp at all. This is the least comfortable full-size headphone I have ever used. Maybe you're supposed to nail it down to your head, Hellraiser-style. The Flares are from the vortex.
 
The R1 sounds like you're stuck six feet underground while the band plays fifty yards away. It's what Jimmy Hoffa hears and he's dead. Cheap headphones like the Koss KSC75, PortaPros, and the Apple Earbuds with the slit out-resolve it. This headphone is only worth its weight in scrap. There is nothing positive about it. You can't even watch Youtube with it. I would rather listen to elevator music over a rotary telephone while on hold. Whoever designed these should be forced to buy back every single unit, smelt them down, and lower himself into the molten metal like Arnold Schwarzenegger at the end of Terminator 2
LuckyNat
LuckyNat
How do you get £750???  I thought they were £450 rrp and regularly much less.
 
Seems a pretty unhelpful review to be honest - you don't say what you use them with and your experience sounds a lot like a very fussy headphone being driven very poorly by whatever you used.
 
Other reviews did find them tilted in frequency response (again that can be matching issues with a headphone that doesn't match much!) but they reported some unique positives too.
 
Also they sorted out the headband and clamping with the Mk II which was launched immediately, with the Mk I being more a test model - sounds like you got one of the Mk Is somehow.
Danthrax
Danthrax
LuckyNat go look at the screwing FR graph it has no bass it has no treble. It's a headphone designed for 60year olds with more money than audible frequencies in their ears. It's a terrible headphone made to be a massive money grab because they know the head-fi hype machine will get fools to buy it. http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/FlareAudioReferenceR1.pdf Here look at that epic turd. It gets outperformed by $10 chinese OEM drivers. Beats aren't even this screwing s**t.
Gondwana
Gondwana
"Cast it into the fire! Destroy it!"
Back
Top