Reviews by fourrobert13

fourrobert13

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Size, battery life, ease of use, stacks well with X1/X3II, cost, DAC, sound, accessories
Cons: Bass boost (more on this below)
About me: I’m 39 years old.  I do have some hearing loss and suffer from mild tinnitus.  I’m a metal head and listen all forms of hard rock to extreme metal.  I’ve always liked music, but just recently got into more hi-end audio and equipment.  Enough about me, on to the review.
 
What you get: As usual, you get a neatly packed amp/DAC with lots of accessories.  To hit the highlights, you get some silicon pads for stacking and a small interconnect cable (1" long and perfect).  You also get a good instruction manual, charging cable, and a couple of bands for stacking.
 
The review:  I ordered the Q1 from Amazon and it arrived without issues.  My soul purpose for buying an amp was to extend the battery life of my X3II.  I do not own any hard to drive headphones and I was extremely happy with the sound of the X3II by itself.  Where I was running into issues was when I use my OTG setup a few times a week and this takes anywhere from one to three hours off my battery life of my X3II depending on what OTG device I am using.  I'd have enough juice to use it at work all day, but no juice left if I wanted to listen when I would get home.
 
As you've figured out by now, I stacked the Q1 with my X3II using the FiiO stacking kit.  For this review, I used my Grado SR60e and Sennheiser HD558 headphones.  The Grados are 38 Ohms and the HD558 are 50 Ohms so the X3II alone was able to drive them without issues.  The differences between these headphones is pretty clear, but I need to hit the cliff notes for those not familiar.  The HD558 are warm sounding, somewhat analytical, great sound stage, and little to no bass (it's there, but only shows up depending on the track).  The Grados are a little cooler sounding, smaller sound stage, punchy bass, and fairly detailed sounding.  Both sets of cans paired well with the X3II alone, but sounded completely different.
 
Once I got everything stacked together, I switched the Q1 on and plugged in my Grados.  I used various genres of metal music (traditional, thrash, death, etc.).  The bass boost switch was off when I began listening and I was not impressed with the sound.  It was dry, bland, boring, and so on.  I thought it just sounded terrible like this and was very disappointed.  I honestly considered boxing this thing up and sending it back because it made things sound worse in my opinion.  I tried low and high gain and had the same results.  It was at that time I decided to give the bass boost a try.  I flipped the switch and suddenly I was hearing what I wanted to hear.  The bass boost gave the music body.  It didn't make things muddy, but instead added life to it.  To me, it was a night and day difference between the sound with the switch on or off.  The Grados already had punchy bass from the X3II, but now it was punchy even at lower volumes and impact was greater.  I didn't notice a difference in the sound stage because the Grados don't have a huge one to begin with.  I did not notice a loss in detail, nor any gain either.  The bass boost just adds some coloration that appealed to me and made the overall sound very pleasing.  I found the low gain setting plenty for my needs and noticed no sound difference between high and low gain when volume was matched.
 
After a week, I decided to give my HD558 a go with the Q1.  I used the same music and I have to say I was very surprised.  With the bass boost off, once again it was just boring and did nothing for me, but I had to try for the purposes of this review.  After I got that out of the way, I flipped the switch again.  What I got here was the Q1 cooled the HD558 sound down which to me was a good thing and gave it some richness that just wasn't there before.  I even got some bass to show up more than what I was experiencing before.  I got a little punch that was missing and every now and then you could feel some impact (which wasn't there before at all).  I really couldn't tell a difference in the sound stage, but once again the Q1's coloration was very pleasing to me with these headphones as well.  I've found myself listening to this set of headphones a lot more now since I really enjoy the sound of them with the Q1.
 
As of this review, I have not used the DAC of the Q1.  The X3II is my primary listening device and I've never even used the DAC in it.  If I get around to that, I will add my thoughts to this review.
 
If anyone is interested, I'm getting right around 14.5 hours of use out of my X3II just playing MP3s.  I get 11 hours using my Sandisk 128gig OTG flash drive and nine hours when using my Transcend OTG card reader.
 
My only gripe about the Q1 is that bass boost switch.  I feel they could have just made the Q1 without it.  This is just my opinion, but I think others will agree with me that the sound of the Q1 with the bass boost off is useless.  It should have just been built sounding like it does with the bass boost on and no switch.  I know someone will disagree, but until you hear it for yourself, please refrain from commenting.
  • Like
Reactions: golov17
fourrobert13
fourrobert13
 @pixelwitch I don't disagree with you, that's why I specify that it's my opinion.  Yours may differ from mine and that's okay.  As far as portability, around the house I throw the stack in my sweat pants pocket or in the back pocket of my jeans.  It's not to bad, but I don't use this to work out (that's what my Sansa Clip+ is for).  Might be a little more portable with the not as thick X1.  I wish I had some more power hungry cans to better test the high and low gain to give a better take on that.
 
@pauliunas, I wouldn't say it adds bass so much as it adds a coloration without diminishing the other frequencies. The best way I can describe it is that it just adds body and richness, yet still maintains the mids and highs.  I hope that makes sense.  I'm not a bass head, but like the impact of a bass drum or the pounding of the double bass drum and this amp does bring that out, but it's not bloated or booming.  It just adds some more punch and impact.  This is why I sometimes hate describing sound, but I would recommend hearing it for yourself to see where I am coming from.
pauliunas
pauliunas
@fourrobert13 I understand that, but I personally find bass annoying. There needs to be *some* bass, but it shouldn't be too loud. The output of my smartphone is just enough in terms of bass. (It's Samsung S4 and its audio chip totally sucks)
D
Diego Davila
I'm looking foward to buy this device

fourrobert13

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Basic, well built, comfortable, sound quality
Cons: Not portable, cable to long
About me: I’m 39 years old.  I do have some hearing loss and suffer from mild tinnitus.  I’m a metal head and listen all forms of hard rock to extreme metal.  I’ve always liked music, but just recently got into more hi-end audio and equipment.  Enough about me, on to the review.
 
What you get: I ordered these headphones from Amazon after demoing them in a local store.  Normally I would purchase them locally, but the local retailor was very proud of them.  You get a pretty plain box with warranty info, headphones, and a ¼” adapter.  The headphones are packed nicely inside.  Nothing real flashy which is fine with me because I just wanted some headphones.
 
The headphones: The SR60e are entry level headphones from Grado and their looks reflect this.  Pretty basic - black in color, black vinyl covering the steel head band, black foam ear pads, and a 5’ black cable.  The cable seems pretty substantial.  The jack and the ¼” adapter are gold plated.  I wish the cable was shorter.  Like I said, nothing flashy, but it doesn’t need to be in my opinion.  The headphones are adjustable to get a proper fit.  All of this isn’t too bad for the $79 delivered from Amazon.
 
Preamble: I hooked the SR60e up to my FiiO X3II with no amp.  I use my X3II as my primary listening device.  Prior to the Grado’s, I was using a set of Sennheiser HD558 and I will do some comparisons between the two as this review goes on.  I read other reviews where guys said they needed to amp the SR60e or really turn the volume up to hear the bass.  I ran these with the X3II on low gain, volume 20 to 35.  I would run the HD558 volume 30 to 50.   I gave the SR60e a healthy dose of various hard rock, traditional heavy metal, thrash, death, and extreme metal.  I used MP3s (VBR and 320 bit rate) and 16/44 flac (purchased and ripped from CDs).
 
SR60e sound: I’m just going to start off and say I enjoy the sound of the SR60e.  It’s very clear and detailed when comparing them to the HD558.  There was better instrument separation and I was hearing things that I wasn’t picking up with the HD558.  I went back and forth a lot between the two and was really surprised at the difference because the HD558 is a slightly more expensive headphone.
 
The SR60e does lack in the soundstage department when compared to the HD558.  This is very obvious, but I didn’t mind it because of the more detailed sound I was getting from the SR60e.  The HD558 stage is pretty wide whereas the SR60e is a bit more inside your head.  After a couple of weeks of listening, I don’t even notice this anymore.  This is just something to consider before purchasing if you are looking for a big soundstage.
 
Highs: The highs were quite nice.  They are slightly veiled behind the mids because the mids are forward.  I could pick up every crack of a symbol without issues and they sounded very natural.  Symbols in the HD558 sometimes sounded artificial and that wasn’t the case with the SR60e.  Once again I went back and forth between the two sets of headphones and could definitely hear the differences and preferred the SR60e.
 
Mids: The mids, like I said before are forward in the SR60e.  They are also forward in the HD558.  Mids in both headphones sound great.  Vocals are more easily heard and understood.  Guitars and drums sound very natural.  The SR60e have very detailed mids as do the HD558, so I have no complaints here.
 
Bass: If you are looking for pounding bass that will rumble your ears, you won’t find it with the SR60e.  You won’t find it with the HD558 either, but here is where the SR60e really shined compared to the HD 558.  The SR60e’s bass was there and just right for hard rock and metal.  The bass was punchy when the double bass drum was going.  I could literally feel each hit.  The bass only shows up sometimes with the HD558.  Bass sounds very natural in the SR60e.  Sometimes it sounded artificial in the HD558, but only with certain songs.  Going back and forth between the two headphones, bass was night and day.  I’m not a bass head, but do like to feel that bass drum hit and I can now feel that with the SR60e.
 
Overall: I would recommend the SR60e to any rock or metal guy.  Currently, my only gripe is the 5’ cable.  This long cable makes the SR60e less than desirable for portable use.  I only wish I had more headphones to compare them to, but my budget is limited.  I’ve read other reviews about the SR60e and those reviews also suggested these for rock and metal and that’s what prompted me to look into them.  I’m very pleased with the SR60e and haven’t used my HD558 since I did the back and forth comparison.  If you are looking for a starter set of headphones, the SR60e is a great value considering the quality and sound you get for $79.
 
ETA: I've noticed the SR60e bring out the bad in lower quality recordings.  What I mean by this is that some of my music (older recordings or low VBR MP3s) don't sound so hot.  Just one example, I purchased a MP3 album from emusic.  Album was released in 2012 and was being sold as a VBR MP3.  The highest bit rate it reach was 248 when using foobar2000.  The lows were distorted and overall the volume really had to cranked up (around 55) to hear it.  I contacted emusic and they refunded me for my purchase and said they could replicate the issue on their end.  This got me thinking because I have some older 192 bit MP3s and even one 128 bit.  The Grados play them fine, but I do have to get the volume up there in order for it to sound decent and there was some distortion.  To be honest, I could hear this with my HD558, but it wasn't as obvious as it is with the SR60e.  I think someone else wrote a review and has something similar to say about the SR60e.  Any way, I just wanted to make sure I added this for those that may be using these with MP3s lower than a 256 bit rate because that seemed to be the line where this appeared.
 
ETA: After more time with these I find the mids overwhelming.  Treble gets drowned out by the mids depending on what I'm listening to.  I've found better options that suite my needs.
 
Test albums:
 
4Arm – Survivalist (flac)                                           Death – Leprocy (flac)
Accept – Stampede (VBR MP3)                                Exodus – Blood in, Blood out (VBR MP3)
Amon Amarth – Fate of Norms (VBR MP3)                Fear Factory – Genexus (VBR MP3)
Battlecross – Rise to Power (320 MP3)                     Hate Eternal – Infernus (flac)
Channel Zero – Feed’em with a Brick (flac)                Iron Maiden – The Book of Souls (VBR MP3)
Carcass – Surgical Steel (VBR MP3)                        The Cult – Sonic Temple (flac)                      
Lamb of God - VII: Sturm und Dang (320 MP3)          Triptykon - Melana Chasmata (VBR MP3)
Children of Bodom – Halo of Blood (flac)                   Obituary – Inked in Blood (flac)
Back
Top