Reviews by Arve

Arve

New Head-Fier
Pros: Overall balance, quality.
Cons: If you are a basshead, look elsewhere
My review is much too long to paste here, so the full-length-review can be found here.
 
I will however summarize my review quickly, and expand a bit on it:
 
  1. These are a good choice if you are a producer on an extremely tight budget - as a "my first studio monitor" speaker
  2. Sound stage and imaging capabilities are much better than you would expect for a $130 speaker
  3. The amplifiers give off a slight hiss
  4. Tonal balance is somewhat dependent on volume setting: From a bit dark on low volumes to bright on high volumes
  5. They don't have what qualifies as sub bass, but again: They don't pretend to, and do a good job in the rest of the frequency range
 
Also, please note that this speaker has gone through two revisions. The first revision had a bass boost control on the back of the speaker that is gone in the Mk II version.  Many of the quality concerns people have mentioned about the first edition do not seem to be present in Mk II.
 
Note that they will easily beat out any computer-oriented brand in the same price tag, and when Tom's Hardware reviewed them, they beat out the $500 Bowers and Wilkins MM-1.
 
Conclusion: If you don't have more to spend, these are a good choice, but if you can afford it, and have enough space, the BX5 D2 from M-Audio offers better sound and better value for money.
zeitfliesst
zeitfliesst
I have these too. I'm now looking for a subwoofer that can go with it though. Any thoughts about which one I should buy and how to hook them up?
Arve
Arve
@zeitfliesst
To use these with a sub, there are two things you need:
1. A subwoofer with low-level inputs and outputs.
2. Something that can act as a volume control - when a sub is connected
The reason for the second requirement is because you can no longer use the volume control on the AV 40's - it would only control the volume of the AV40's, and not that of the sub. The cheapest option for this is probably a cheap mixer, like the Behringer 302 (about $50). You'd then wire from the outputs of the behringer to the sub's line in, and from the line out on the sub to the AV40's
With that being said, I don't like subwoofers much - it's hard to find a sub that integrates well into an existing setup, and it's hard to set one up properly, and to deal with room modes, you should rather have two than 1, and 4 rather than two, at which stage your subwoofer rig is ten times the price of your AV40's.
If I were to make a proposal, it would be that you instead got higher-quality monitors that have bass response in to the sub-bass region, like the Emotiva AirMotiv 5 ($450) - for near-field use, they have enough bass response to deal with most of what you can throw at them. If you like M-Audio, I can also recommend the BX5 D2 (but that one essentially requires that you have a mixer or other volume control, as the speakers themselves have none, apart from a gain setting at the back of each speaker)
zeitfliesst
zeitfliesst
Arve, thanks for all that information. It sure helped out a lot. I guess I'll try and hold it out without any subwoofers for a while until I upgrade to something else in the future.

Arve

New Head-Fier
Pros: Soundstage
Cons: Isolation
Ok, I'm not going to paste my entire review in here  it's over 4000 words, and quite probably the most comprehensive review ever of a product being delivered as a bundled product, so I'm just going to point at my actual review:
 
http://veven.org/reviews/2012/09/apple-earpod-review/
 
If you want a short TL;DR (Which I can understand, given the length):
 
  1. Much better than expected bass - much better than the Nuforce NE-700X, but not quite as good as Senn HD 558 or B&W C6
  2. Average detail reproduction: On-par with the Nuforces, but not as good as the Senns or B&W's
  3. Sound stage that beats just about any headphone, I've heard, ever! 
  4. Look elsewhere if isolation is a requirement
  5. It's popular to hate Apple, and some other reviews reflect that - but these are worth $29, even as a standalone purchase, provided isolation is not an issue.
  • Like
Reactions: tamleo
milan425
milan425
Great review, read it in one breath. Good to know that Apple finaly made it. If the cable remained the same, well, ther's room for an improvement for next gen :)
kazsud
kazsud
They sound great and I am pleasantly surprised how good they sound. I think they are better than the apple in-ear model and senn 218
Arve
Arve
@milan425: The cable is not exactly the same as before - the old one had two different materials, with different grippiness - the new cable is grippy all over, but less so than the old cable, and perhaps less prone to tangling than the old one. I'm saying perhaps because I'd have to test it over time.

Arve

New Head-Fier
Pros: Tangle-free cable, packaging, good microphone, good build quality, decent mids and treble
Cons: Difficult fit, cable noise, little isolation, anemic sound
I bought these after my pair of Sennheiser CX-300 II's fell out of my pocket, as a short-term solution until I could find something I really wanted.   The packaging on them is excellent, with the headphones in a sturdy box that you're unlikely to ever lose.  Included with the headphones are five different pairs of tips, for different sized ears, a lengthy printed user manual, and the headphones themselves.
 
The headphones themselves are very sturdily built,  and have a flat, completely tangle-free cable and an iPhone mic.  The tangle-free aspect of them is very enjoyable, as you can put them anywhere, and you're not going to have to spend five minutes untangling some gordian knot in order to use them.  Also, while the headphone is built entirely in plastic, they seem to be able to take a good beating.  Also, the headphone jack is excellent - it's angled and very low profile, and so is very good for those who put their phone or player in their pocket.
 
As for wearing comfort, the a-jay four are very light, and the tip doesn't protrude much from your ear, which makes them good for wearing under a beanie or hat during winter, and it makes them very suited for using while lying on your side - they don't protrude from the ear.  Also, wearing them for extended periods of time is likely to be comfortable.  However,  the flat cable has its ups and downs - while they provide hassle-free use, the weight of the cable is quite noticeable - the cable tugs on your ears and will easily come out, and doubly so in the case of the right-hand side, due to the weight of the microphone.  Also, due to the weight of the cable, it's quite noise - move around, and you'll hear the cable bang against your cheeks.  While this can be partially remedied by wearing the headphones behind your neck, it's not a complete solution, and it makes the built-in microphone and volume control next to useless.
 
That being said, the microphone is quite good - I've used my a-jays as a handsfree solution, and the microphone is pretty ergonomic - the volume buttons are placed on each side of the play/pause/answer button, and the buttons are differently shaped, so you can tell which button you're about to push without looking at it.  Also, the microphone is usable in many conditions without having to hold it next to your mouth, even in outdoor and noisy scenarios.
 
So, what about the sound?  Unfortunately, this is where they fall completely flat.  First off, even with the rated impedance of 16 ohm, they are not particularily easy to drive, with a rated sensitivity of 96 dB. Next, there is the frequency response - I have pretty average ears - and have used any number of in-ears in the past, all of which have given me a seal with the medium/standard-sized silicone tips.  With the a-jays, I never got the distinct impression that I had a seal.  I could clearly hear the world around me still, and I was unable to get a proper seal even with tips that have given me a good seal when mounted to other headphones like the Sennheiser CX-300 II and CX-380, Sony MDR-75EX or the Nuforce NE-700X's.
 
At low volumes, the mids and highs are very pleasant. Not overly detailed, but not lacking either, and they are without any perceived peaks or dips, which means they can be worn without causing excessive listening fatigue.
 
But, as said above, the lack of a seal means that bass is extremely restrained, to the point of very nearly being absent.  While this can be partially remedied by simply turning up the volume, that is not a good idea, because as soon as you turn up the volume, the once pleasant mids and highs takes on a shrill quality, like someone screaming in your ear.  
 
And even if you do get a seal, this aspect of the headphones doesn't go away. When I forced a seal on them, by wrapping them, and then wrapping my earlobes over the ear canal (Yes, they do protrude so little that this is possible), the bass is still anemic.
 
That being said, what little bass there is isn't muddled or heavily distorted. It's there, but even if you're not a bass head, it's just too thin.
 
Also, the low sensitivity, and low isolation level means that as soon as you venture out of your office, you will have to turn up the sound in order to get acceptable listening levels, which leaves you with the shrill mids and highs. The unpleasantness of this sound has occurred on all devices I've tried it with: two laptops (Lenovo X201 and an MBP), an aging Sony Walkman MP3 player, the iPhone 4 and the first and third incarnations of the iPad.
 
 
So, in conclusion: Would I buy these again, or recommend them to a friend?  The sound quality is, due to the lack of seal, low sensitivity and anemic bass not much better than the default Apple earbuds, and while the cable is the most hassle-free solution I've come across, it causes too much noise when moving around.  So no, I suggest you look elsewhere. 
 
Back
Top