Reviews by AcousticMatt

AcousticMatt

100+ Head-Fier
Organic Tone Hug
Pros: organic warm tone
un-fatiguing and pleasant tuning (no sibilance!)
amazing sense of space
fun & punchy
trickle-down technology (ADS) from higher-end ZMF models
build quality
looks beautiful and unique even among other ZMF headphones
Cons: can be too much mid-bass at times
Bokeh pic1 JPEG.jpg
This review comes at quite a serendipitous time for me. I say that because people have been encouraging me to get into reviewing, I’d been seriously thinking about it and then I got an email from Zach saying he was sending me a Bokeh unit to check out. Sweet. Great time to start! Thanks so much to ZMF and Zach for sending this out.

I’ve loved listening to music on headphones since I was young. My first high-end headphone was the Audeze LCD-2 which I bought in early 2021. I have since then listened to and have bought many more headphones, amps & DACs, searching for… I’m not totally sure, but I know it when I hear it. In short, I want to be moved. And I love the process of breaking it down as to why I’m being moved or not while listening to a headphone, which will hopefully be helpful to you here.

I thought it’d be fun to do a little different kind of review; one that was more of an audio journey where I share my experience in listening to Bokeh on most of my setup configurations. This is how I’ve shared what I’ve been listening to with people in my life and the best part about it is that I’ve seen people get excited this way.

My first experience with Bokeh was the evening it first arrived. It was early December, the Christmas tree was up and it was already dark out. My wife and I in the living room when the package arrived from FedEx. It felt like getting an early Christmas gift. I opened it up, thinking that I’d get to listening sometime in the next couple of days. Instead, both of us were inspired by the whole thing (especially when I pulled the headphone out - it looked awesome and unmistakably ZMF) and wanted to listen right then. I told her that Bokeh was meant to be driven well from a phone, so I grabbed my adapter for her to listen on hers. She’s a dance teacher and sometimes listens to my headphones to songs that she’s choreographing to. Although she’s pretty supportive of my obsession with audio, she’s definitely not an obsessed audiophile like me. We have however connected in the past over her listening to songs she’s choreographing to on some of my other headphones.

Very soon after she started listening, she told me that the sound had inspired her right away with some dance ideas. The rest of the evening turned into me bringing out the rest of my semi-portable gear to the living room as well as some other headphones so we could listen and explore more. Since this happened in such an unplanned way, I found this indicative of just how enjoyable the Bokeh would be to listen to. We listened on her phone, my phone, on my iFi Diablo, Hugo2 and Woo WA8. Her excitement excited me, and I was listening to some of my other headphones on these smaller DAC/amps while she listened to the Bokeh on her phone (my VC, LCD-2 & Meze Empyrean, if you must know). It became funny at some point - she would tell me that she really wanted me to hear it, but she was so drawn into the sound that she wanted to keep listening for awhile. I was totally fine with that. Needless to say, she was moved. When I finally got my turn, I was moved too. It immediately reminded me of Meze Empyrean’s tuning - warm and spacious sounding. I’ll get into more details of that comparison though.

After that night, I started listening to Bokeh on my own on my phone, on those same smaller, more portable-ish DAC/amps I mentioned above as well as on my bigger amps and DACs. I intentionally did not read or watch any reviews before writing down all of my impressions because I wanted to allow myself to hear what I heard and minimize potentially being influenced by others’ impressions. All impressions are with the stock pads. I used my phone to stream from Apple Music when using the Dragonfly/phone and also when using the iFi Diablo and then used my Cayin N8ii to stream (also via Apple Music) in all other setups. I do notice a sound difference - things do sound a little sharper, cleaner and the bass legitimately sounds more textured and holds on to the decay a little longer of notes in that area when I stream on the Cayin N8ii compared to streaming on my phone.

iPhone + Dragonfly Red.

I started here with the most simplified setup with the most little power. In short, Bokeh sounded great, unsurprisingly after listening that night. Two things pop out immediately once I started listening again: the mid-bass sounded elevated and the tuning sounded pleasantly quite warm. Upon further listening, the next thing that stood out was just how amazing the sense of space and imaging is. It sounded better than any other headphone I’ve heard in this category of sound at this price point. It reminded me of how the Atrium Closed does space. I’ve since learned that the Bokeh has the ADS - Atrium Damping System - and, aha! This makes a lot of sense to me and lines up with what I hear. The same technology that makes Atrium and Atrium Closed sound so good in these same categories has trickled down to this model.

One song I listened to was what my wife has been listening to as she was choreographing - John Legend’s “Nervous”. It is surprising how much bass power comes from this setup. Granted, I'm using the Drangonfly, so it’s not straight listening from a phone, but I do remember being just as impressed hearing straight from her phone. The bass, sense of space and warm and engaging sounds, especially in the vocals, sounded so good. I could see why she was inspired with ideas right away.

A real highlight here was listening to Gregory Porter’s Liquid Spirit album. Bokeh’s tuning sounds warm in a way that the upper-mids are not as present as other headphones, like the Caldera or Atrium Closed. But, it doesn’t sound unnaturally hollow there either, which is very important since that can sound like something is missing in someone’s voice or in other midrange band instruments. The LCD-2 can sound hollow in this way (more on this comparison later). Gregory’s voice sounds phenomenally centered and beautiful. It is mixed quite loud in the mix to be fair, but can indeed sound more distant on gear that really over-emphasizes space and/or has much less present mids, so the mix of having the vocals still sound focused and intimately close while still sounding spacious is quite an achievement and one that I find I prefer. His voice sounds lushly warm, but not overly so. I’m very used to hearing this album on the Caldera and I notice there’s a lack of sibilance (more on that later as well) and upper mid clarity on the Bokeh. Specifically on “No Love Dying” - the tone is so good, sense of space is so good & vocals are so good and centered. Reverb tails sound very nice and noticeable.

Bokeh pic6 Diablo JPEG.jpg


iFi Diablo.

Moving on with the same album on the iFi Diablo, the same sound characteristics are there, but the bass sounds better - more powered and the reverb trails last just a bit longer, a trait this DAC/amp always gives any headphone, enhancing the sense of space, feeling even more like you’re there. I love the sound of this thing, and, if you’re in the market for a DAC/amp of this size with your Bokeh, I highly recommend it for a solid state.

A highlight on this setup was listening to Luke Howard Trio’s The Sanctuary album. Sounds really good and spacious. Bass sounds impactful. More controlled sounding than on the phone setup. Bokeh sounds very fun, very pleasant, which works with any genre I played through it, and it worked well with this jazz trio record, which is well recorded. Its warmer tuning didn’t give it as much atmosphere up top on instruments like drum cymbals, but it emphasized the soul and the groove more, a theme which continued throughout other genres and setups. This warmer tuning also works very well with a more incisive sound, which some has described the Diablo as being.

Chord Hugo2.

Continuing with the same album now on this DAC/amp, the sense of space decreases a little bit, meaning everything sounds closer in, but the resolution is even better. Naturally, higher frequencies pop out more. The bass is tighter, cleaner and sounds more like a tight punch than the more visceral wallop that the Diablo gives. It does help clean up Bokeh’s mid-bass a bit though, and its resolving capabilities are a great fit for the warm, somewhat more blurred sound of Bokeh. Overall, I prefer the Diablo. Diablo is more fun with Bokeh and other headphones. I moved on to the next DAC/amp I had because I wasn’t as moved on this setup.

Bokeh pic5 Hugo2:WA8 JPEG.jpg


Woo WA8.

My favorite so far is now switching to the Woo WA8. Bass is oomphy, a little more rounded versus the cleaner bass sound of every other option. But, for me, it’s the tone of the instruments getting enhanced, as well as the more holographic soundstage that sells me. It’s a gorgeous sound. Organic timbre meeting tubes, beautiful. I consider this scaling. It opens up to the source.

The DAC inside is not as resolving as something like the Hugo2, but it works very well with its tube amp sound. Pair it with the Hugo2 as DAC though and then you’ve got a something special. This works well for most headphones I’ve listened to it with, but Bokeh comes alive even more on this setup. I highly recommend it. Even if you’re able to just get the WA8, I think it’s totally worth it.

There were many highlights here since I was the most engaged while listening on this setup and therefore kept listening. One was Anjunadeep’s 10 compilation album, a melancholy, vibey EDM album that takes tracks from many different artists and puts them together in a seamless, gap-less stream. I’ve heard this album many times. The bass is visceral, and the imaging is gorgeous. Very melancholy and emotional. Even though these are synthetic instruments for the most part, they’re played with emotion, and the Bokeh captures that. To be fair, it’s mixed well, so all headphones showcase this song well, but each headphone imparts its own color onto the sound. For Bokeh, it’s a warm hug. Big bass, realistic soundstage, gorgeous imaging and warm, lifelike emotion throughout, fitting the tone of the song. The next song, “Belong”, I noticed a softening of the upper frequency percussion sounds. I’m used to it having a bit more snap and bite in the upper frequencies on headphones like the Atrium Closed or Caldera. It’s never fatiguing on those headphones, just even more exciting in those areas. You pay attention more. On Bokeh, it’s softened in a way so I can listen while doing something else without having my attention pulled back to these sounds.

Another standout is HAEVN’s “Where Did You Go?” and it’s so beautiful. The vocals are clear, mixed up front, but Bokeh’s timbre rendition is great with them and the song still sounds spacious and punchy.

Going back to Luke Howard Trio’s The Sanctuary album on this setup and it sounds even better. Even more spacious, even better tone than while listening on the Diablo.

A little back and forth fun with these portable-ish setups:

Young the Giant’s Mind Over Matter album now on the Dragonfly/phone setup. Sounds very nice. Good imaging, good sense of space. Good bass punch. Warm sounding. Bass is a little looser than normal. Vocals sound nice.

On iFi Diablo now, continuing “Anagram” from Mind Over Matter. More energetic, more treble, even more sense of space. Even more texture. More exciting. More fitting for this genre.

Back to Dragonfly on next song. Still nice and energetic, just not quite as much as iFi Diablo’s sound.

“Crystallized” - started on Dragonfly, started the song over on Hugo2/WA8. Sounds amazing. Even more energetic. More spacious. More separated layers. More fun.

Adele’s “I Miss You”. Bass punch is amazing. Voice sounds incredible. Drums sound incredible. This is on Hugo2/WA8.

Vin Downe’s “Entwined and Lost”. Solo melodic acoustic guitar track. Still on Hugo2/WA8. Sounds so nice, lush and spacious. Tone is gorgeous and so fitting for this kind of thing.

Bokeh pic10 Woo and Envy JPEG.jpg


How high do they scale? Woo WA-23 + iFi Pro iDSD Signature.

I’m very grateful to own some amazing high end tube amps, the Woo WA-23 and Feliks Envy. The Woo WA-23 is my current favorite amp and has been so ever since I heard it and bought it at CanJam SoCal 2022. I wanted to hear what Bokeh sounded like out of it since I’m very used to its sound. How does Bokeh sound out of a $9000 amp (with $1800 Takatuski 2A3 tubes rolled in)?

In short, great. The same qualities of space, warmth, bass punch and organic timbre are there but more on display. There’s just more of all those things in the sound. Everything sounds more obviously more “High-Fi” like you’ve just began listening on an amp that costs $9000 - as it should! This amp does this to all of my headphones and is the only headphone amps I’ve owned where the synergy is great with everything, planar or dynamic. I said that the Bokeh “comes alive” even more out of the Woo WA8 setup and does even more-so on this setup. Times two. Or three.

Feliks Envy + iFi Pro iDSD Signature.

People have been asking me about how I like the Envy versus the WA-23. In short, I like the WA-23 a lot more. The Envy sounds even bigger and badder in the bass, has a more wide soundstage, but something is missing in the mids for me. It sounds amazing at first because of the bigness of the sound, but it’s not as emotionally engaging as the WA-23. The WA-23 sounds big too, but more cohesive and with a much better midrange, regardless if I’m using the Psvane 2A3s or the Takatsuki’s (which have a more open soundstage, and even better imaging and details versus the Psvanes).

This listening experience with Bokeh has had me hone in even more on what I like and why I’m liking it. When I first got the LCD-2, I never would have thought that I’d desire a great midrange or a lifelike timbre. I thought it’d be in things that are more obviously “wow-ing”. The Envy is great for that “wow” factor because it has a weighted sound - it makes drums sound especially real and visceral. I’ll be able to try some WE300B tubes soon, which are supposed to be great for midrange. In short, it works for Bokeh in the same way it works for other headphones. But if you want that engaging midrange, it’s not the choice with the stock performance edition tubes in my opinion.


Cayin N8ii.
Scaling back a bit, this all-in-one DAP is probably the best small-form-factor fit for Bokeh. It can stream, has a great DAC and you’ve got a lot of options on the amp side (Class A, Class AB, Tube mode, and P+ which gives you more power). Plugging into the balanced or single ended output of this DAP with no adapters or extra devices or cables, it’s a simple high-fi setup and it’s simply done very well in my opinion. Bokeh sounds quite enjoyable out of it with all of its qualities that show up out of other setups. I prefer Class AB, Tube mode with P+ on. The sound is punchy, spacious and beautiful. Class A is great for a more relaxed sound, and getting out of Tube mode gets you a more tight, close solid state sound.

Bokeh pic3 Atrium Closed JPEG.jpg


Versus Atrium Cosed.

I switched between the Bokeh and the Atrium Closed on all of these setups and there’s some obvious differences between the two headphones: The most obvious is that the Atrium Closed has more treble extension and more air around instruments. Coming from listening to the Bokeh for a while, it takes my brain a bit to adjust to the difference. This attribute of the AC makes the soundstage sound bigger, more holographic and therefore more engaging, more like you’re there. Bokeh has more mid-bass, AC has more sub-bass. The AC also has the upper mids filled in more, so voices and instruments like saxophone and trumpet sound more realistic and even more engaging to me. Atrium Closed has become one of my favorite headphones ever, second only to Caldera and I prefer it overall to the Bokeh, as engaging as I find Bokeh. Bokeh’s got its own vibe that separates it from the AC, but to me, Atrium Closed sounds like an upgrade Bokeh in a way. Bassy, warm, engaging, lush, great imaging, organic sounding. All these apply to both headphones.

Bokeh pic7 LCD2 JPEG.jpg


Versus LCD-2.

LCD-2 and Bokeh are similarly priced, which is part of why I’m comparing. If I were in the market for a headphone in this price category, Bokeh and LCD-2 would be two options near the top I’d be deciding between. I still have my LCD-2 and also still consider them a great value and an enjoyable listen. It offers some of the same characteristics as Bokeh - a warmer, enjoyable yet fun sound. But they differ in some big ways. After listening to the Bokeh for a while on multiple chains, switching to the LCD-2 made me realize just how calibrated my ears have become to ZMF’s sound. I’ve been listening to my Caldera and Atrium Closed over the last few months almost exclusively, because, well, they’ve been really moving me. When I switched over to the LCD-2 after listening to the Bokeh, many things were obviously different. LCD-2 has a more linear bass. LCD-2 sounds more hollow in the upper mids. LCD-2 has a treble peak. LCD-2’s tone is very pleasant, but it doesn’t sound quite as lifelike and organic as Bokeh’s. I notice it the most in things like piano. On Bokeh, pianos sound more lifelike and also a little lusher, more smooth than on the LCD-2. The LCD-2 sounds like something harmonically is missing in the tone of the piano. High notes played with more attack are also jarring on the LCD-2 where they’re not on the Bokeh. I also notice it on higher frequency or louder trumpet and saxophone passages, with the same differences between each headphone. The LCD-2 sounds rich in its own way, sounding tonally dense in a way that I’ve never heard any other non-Audeze headphones (LCD-3 and LCD-4 have this tonal density sound too), and sounds almost compressed, but its tone is not as lifelike, as organic as the Bokeh. These are where these headphones divide, other than the obvious that one’s an open back and another is a closed back.

Oh, that and the soundstage on Bokeh really kills the LCD-2. Bokeh sounds more spacious and like you’re there in the room. That ADS must really do something to the stage and layering. Again, it sounds better than any other headphone in this category than anything I've owned or heard at this price point. LCD-2 sounds more compressed comparatively. Sounds are closer and a can be more exciting overall though.

Listening at shows like CanJam, I probably would have chose the LCD-2 immediately over the Bokeh because it’s obviously more exciting and resolved between the layers, less blurred sounding. But, the benefit of having both headphones at home and time to really hone in has proven Bokeh’s sound to be something I prefer. There’s more of a refinement there and more enjoyable for longer periods of time listening.


Bokeh pic8 Empyrean JPEG.jpg



Versus Meze Empyrean (original version).

As I wrote earlier, when I first heard Bokeh, it reminded me of this headphone. On comparing the two, they do indeed sound the most similar to me out of all other headphones I compared to. Empyrean’s spacious sound, mid-bass emphasis and generally warm tuning are all quite similar to the Bokeh. Empyrean sounds more open though (make sense, it’s an open back) and a little cleaner and therefore more resolving than Bokeh. Empyrean sounds like it has a wider soundstage where Bokeh sounds like it’s got more depth. Empyrean also sounds a hair cleaner in its mid-bass area, like sounds in that area appear fast (also makes sense, it’s a planar) and then also those sounds go away faster. Empyrean has a little more treble extension and air up top, so cymbals stick out a little more. It doesn’t sound unnatural though. And, speaking of natural-ness, I think Empyrean sounds quite natural. Warm, but natural. I’ve seen some negative or so-so reviews on the Empyrean, which I get in some ways, but it’s a headphone I enjoy a lot. Bokeh sounds warm as well of course and I’d say even more natural in its timbre. Instruments sound even more real on it.

Both headphones are easy to drive, but Bokeh was less picky with sources. Surprisingly the Woo WA8 was not a great fit for the Empyrean. It sounded fine, but tonally it did something to it that sounded a little off to me versus everything else I’ve tried it on.

Bokeh pic4 Atrium JPEG.jpg


Versus Atrium.

I just want to put this one in here because Bokeh reminds me a bit of Atrium in that they both have some mid-bass emphasis and have a gorgeous sense of space. But, Atrium’s sense of space is unique - I’ve heard not other headphone that sounds as spherical and layered as it does, even Bokeh or Atrium Closed. And it does it in a very cool way. Bokeh sounds more like Atrium Closed than the Atrium in the sense of space, although Atrium Closed sounds even bigger. Another main obvious difference, other than the fact that Atrium’s an open back and Bokeh’s a closed back, is that Atrium has much more present upper-mids than Bokeh. The lack of that on Bokeh means there’s no sibilance and no metallic, grainy sounds. It sounds so pleasant and relaxed. Atrium actually sounds pleasant and relaxed too (and also have not noticed much, if any sibilance), and even though it’s got those upper-mids, it never sounds fatiguing. Maybe it’s the way the sounds it distributed or the lush sound of the biocellulose driver that helps with that. Atrium is a beautiful yet punchy sound overall and would be worth a listen if you’re deciding between it and the Bokeh.

Bokeh pic2 Caldera JPEG.jpg


Versus Caldera.

To me these headphones are apples & oranges in most ways, but share the ZMF organic, natural timbre thing. In short, Bokeh sounds way warmer and less clear than Caldera. In long, Caldera is more linear in the bass and sounds much more tilted towards the upper-mids and treble versus the Bokeh. It has, however, never been fatiguing to me, which I cannot say for my other flagships I own: Susvara and Utopia. Caldera has made me tear up while listening 5 times now. After editing this review, now 6! No other headphone has made me do this, which I find very compelling. There’s a few things at play here that I think contributes to why I’m so emotionally moved (probably more, but for the sake of keeping it somewhat short): there’s something in the mids that sound so lifelike to me, like I can feel the emotion in the music even more, like I’m there. The treble is also incredibly resolving, yet incredibly smooth. It also seems to enhance the emotion of the music rather than detract from it like other flagships I’ve heard. Interestingly, I notice sibilance on this headphone more than any other ZMF I’ve heard, and yet it doesn’t make me wince, it’s just there. Other headphones that I’ve noticed sibilance as much on like the Utopia becomes fatiguing. The Caldera’s nature in these treble areas seem to enhance the emotional experience rather than put an unnatural spotlight where there perhaps just shouldn’t be one. Also, the sense of space and imaging sound the most lifelike out of every other ZMF I’ve heard. It’s on another level. It’s flagship good, but it’s good in a way that always enhances my experience to whatever I’m listening to in an enjoyable way where I want to keep listening. It has become my favorite headphone.

I didn’t notice any sibilance whatsoever on Bokeh and think that you’ll gravitate towards it if you prefer a warmer sound. But, like most of us, you’re probably not going to get one headphone and be done. Bokeh is a great compliment to something like the Caldera.

Weaknesses?

I have one: Bokeh's bass sounds a little woof-y to me at times - a little bloomy and round, rather than being clean and clear. It sounds like it could be reflecting off the cups, creating a chamber of a little too much mud. It doesn’t happen all the time, but can happen when there’s a bass heavy track, especially if there’s louder notes coming from a double bass. The Atrium Closed, in contrast, sounds more controlled in this area. Both headphones are similarly bass-tilted, but the AC sounds more sub-bass focused rather than mid-bass focused like the Bokeh. When I’ve mixed my own music, I always EQ out extra mid-bass, so maybe it’s a taste thing. I like it more linear there. The Atrium Closed can shine the spotlight in those bass areas when called for in the music, but it disappears faster and doesn’t create as much unclear murkiness. Bokeh sounds like it’s got the “fun” part of that sonic spectrum dialed up and the control and texture part in that same are therefore dialed down. It reminds me of hearing a double bass at live shows sound a little too woody at times, for lack of a better term, so you lose out on the more subtle texture and get more of a dominating WOOF sound. I’ve noticed this same thing on Atrium (open) - since both sound elevated in the mid-bass, which is probably why I prefer the Atrium Closed over both. Ultimately, it doesn’t take away much from the other parts of music, but I’ve realized time and time again, I like a cleaner mid-bass. Anything other than it sounds can sound like some sort of fabric is unnecessarily put in front of a voice or other instrument at times. Bokeh more than makes up for this though with its sense of space, sense of fun (and hey, that part of that bass response is probably part of the fun!) and organic timbre. They may not be for you if you enjoy a more linear bass or more of a neutral or cleaner sound. But, as I used to enjoy and prefer that as well, I now find myself preferring the timbre and sense of space that ZMF headphones offer and that includes Bokeh and Atrium. You may too. I mentioned that all impressions were with the stock pads and, based on past experiences with pad swapping other ZMF headphones, using another set of pads (Bokeh includes two more), this mid-bass could probably be tamed by doing this.

Should you Bokeh?

Maybe it’s that my ears are more calibrated towards ZMF’s offerings now, but I’ve become a huge fan of what ZMF offers. I like to think I’ve honed more in on what I actually enjoy listening to. In my opinion, ZMF does a more refined and organic version of audio and its one that I find so enjoyable. Even though Bokeh does have some obviously standout qualities right from the first few moments of listening, the refined timbre and space of the presentation is consistently enjoyable over longer listening sessions. The saying “wherever you go, there you are” has come to mind a lot when I think of ZMF: who you are and what you value is going to translate into your work. Zach and ZMF are people that bring such a sense of joy, humility and craftsmanship to the sound and look of all their headphones and these positive qualities are very much the same in how I experience them as people. I highly recommend getting Bokeh or any other ZMF headphone!
Last edited:
Loftprojection
Loftprojection
One of the nicest review I've read, Bravo! Your HP and amp stable is unbelievable. I also have the WA8 and original Empyrean, I never realized my real impression on this duo but you clearly put out words that define it quite good. I mostly use the Empyrean with my Unison SH desktop tube amp and Orchid tube DAC, love the sound it produces.

I think you just sold me on the Atrium closed with this review. I've been thinking about closed HP for a while and these may well be the best complement to my Empyrean while maintaining a similar sound signature I love, smooth and refined.
AcousticMatt
AcousticMatt
@Loftprojection Hey, thanks! Glad you enjoyed the review and, indeed, I'm very grateful to have the headphones and amps I have. Interesting you found the same thing with the Empyrean/WA8 combo. The Empyrean is so good on so many things and the WA8 is so great with so many other headphones, so I'm still not sure why they're not quite a good fit for each other. I'll have to try the Unison and Orchid tube DAC sometime. I sold my iFi DAC recently and am looking at getting a tube DAC - the Linear Tube Audio Aero has piqued my interest for sure.

And oh yeah, if you get the Atrium Closed, I don't think you'll be disappointed. It's pretty awesome. I have two and may sell one at some point if you'd be interested.
K
Kelvin will
Great review and amazing photos. Thank you for the detailed comparison
Back
Top