Quote: Originally Posted by _M2 ^what? join date mar2007 and you already spent $800... What can I say...I'm addicted, but didn't spend anywhere near $800...not THAT addicted...yet! I've been lurkin' here for awhile. It's the earphone addiction that made me officially join so that...

Another KSC75 fan here! And yes, as others have said, take your phones and run from here! I was not warned, and seems I'm hitting 'ADD to Cart' weekly now!

Quote: Originally Posted by Eagle_Driver In that case, it depends on the difference in efficiency versus impedance ratings between headphones. Recently, I have run across some very-low-impedance headphones that have very low efficiency ratings (and thus relatively low sensitivity...

Quote: Originally Posted by mastercheif Well, that is only one part of the equation. You also have to take in account that the Higher Impendance Headphones will need to be played at a louder level in order to reach a optimal listing level. OK, given that...if one turns up the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Eagle_Driver Actually, a low-impedance headphone will give you less battery time on a portable device than a higher-impedance headphone (with the volume control setting exactly equal). This is because lower-impedance headphones actually draw more current from...

Question from a earphone newb....would a low impedance earphone give you more battery time on a portable device as opposed to a higher impedance earphone?

Forum newb here, been reading a lot 'n learning, 1st post; Put me down for the ER-4P's!! Love 'em!