Search results for query: *
  1. mmeysarosh

    Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

    Setting the sampling rate this high was a solution to move the effect of the filters out of the audio band, and sometimes quite audibly so. You would still have a filter, but its effect in audible sounds was next to nothing since it would begin its work at the 40Hkz range. One of the many times...
  2. mmeysarosh

    Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

    Certainly, and even a better example is loud concert. The conversation you have afterwards is oddly loud for good reason. I'm also quite sure that if you measured the sustained dynamic range of hearing across various frequencies, it would also show some significant curves with wide variations...
  3. mmeysarosh

    Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

    While you will only be able to discern sound up to 40db below the RMS power of a track, you can withstand significantly more above that in a short impulse. Again, no one would use it as it has limited practical purpose. Another thing to note is that our hearing has significantly different...
  4. mmeysarosh

    Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

    Human impulse dynamic hearing can reach 120db. Granted you wouldn't want to do it all day, unless you really would like to eventually shut out the rest of the world.
  5. mmeysarosh

    Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

    For the vast majority of consumers, its generally correct for a variety of reasons. In comparing 16 bit to 24 bit recording depth, people can hear dynamics beyond a the 16 bit level, only a limited number of playback devices are capable of resolving that data in analog performance. The iPhone 6...
  6. mmeysarosh

    TEAC UD-H01 USB DAC

    The rear outputs are fixed and the volume knob in the from controls the headphone amplifier.
  7. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    The M51 does run a bit above specifications when it comes to output voltage. If the input stages on your preamp do not handle above 2V for single ended or 4V for balanced, it will likely result in  distortion. My M51 has no distortion at any point and I was able to test both outputs in my setup...
  8. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    After going through tests between the Wadia 121 DAC and NAD M51 both direct and though preamp, I can quite easily affirm the digital volume control provided by the M51 as the better of two. The gap between the two products actually widened when going direct as the NAD seems to do no harm to high...
  9. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    I just started using the M51 without my preamp and it seems to drive everything quite well. I will try a session between the two over the weekend and provide some notes on what I hear.
  10. mmeysarosh

    DAC Shoot Out...

    I will also give a thumbs up to the NAD M51. I actually have a Wadia 121 DAC in house for comparison and the M51 is ahead in most areas. I just began my direct DAC to amp to see how I like it without any preamp in the way.   Another Head-Fi user had compared the M51 to the Audio GD and...
  11. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    I picked up my own for $1760 USD, including shipping.
  12. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    I certainly understand and this also is something that is a matter of perspective and preference. I agree with the sentiments that is within a certain price range, but in the case with this NAD, it seems to a significant degree upward. My Marantz SA-11S1 was always regarded as a very good red...
  13. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    I would be astonished if the M51 didn't achieve exemplary measurements. I'm using the NAD M2 as a reference for measurements and it was given a clean bill of health. The proof is in the pudding, so to speak, and NAD is most certainly delivering.   I will state that all my listening has been...
  14. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    Well after the first day of break in for the Wadia 121 DAC, it now faced its first session against the NAD M51. I can't heap enough praise on the NAD M51 as it showed a clear and significant step up from the Wadia. Its truly sounding wonderful in my system and I have not even tried it direct to...
  15. mmeysarosh

    Wadia 121 decoding computer

    I have the Wadia 121 DAC breaking in at home now and will let you know what I think of it in the near future. I will say that first initial hearing is mixed as I heard a a wide, but not very deep sound stage. Dynamics were also some what on the short side.
  16. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    The Wadia 121 is in and breaking in via USB at the moment. I have already adjusted the output to 4V to more closely match my Marantz SA-11S1 and NAD M51. Going to give the Wadia  few hours on repeat before I take a real sit down with these three. The veteran, the champ, and the contender.
  17. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    I decided to try out one more DAC to pit against the NAD M51. The challenger will be in the form of the Wadia 121 DAC. Should be an interesting comparison with the M51 using their innovative Zetex chip in comparison to the Digimaster implementation from Wadia.   What I do about the Wadia is...
  18. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    Its a shame about the availability and my dealer had mentioned that availability was going to be an issue when I purchased it.   The Arcam D33 had peaked my interests at one point, but I thought they may have out priced themselves a bit. If the performance was something stellar on the other...
  19. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    Just had seen this over on another site and I thought I might let all those interested take a gander.   http://www.digitalaudioreview.net.au/index.php/news-blog-and-showcase/john-darkos-blog/item/354-nad-m51-digital-direct-dac-initial-impressions   I'm personally on day 4 with my M51 and...
  20. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    My experience with digital sources are a bit different overall. It may very well have to do with the Pass equipment not getting very much in the way. In the past, I had tested out Emotiva's XDA-1 as well as the Teac UD-H01. At the time, computer audio still seemed to be quite early on and I just...
  21. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    Just on the basis of using the third filter on the Marantz, they sound more similar than different, but in  a good way.   Upright bass being presented with greater power and richness. It also seems to provide all the transparency and detail of the Marantz, but with a greater sense of ease...
  22. mmeysarosh

    NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC Impressions

    Just received mine today and currently listening to it while its breaking in. What I can say at the moment is that I am hearing quite a good DAC. Its obviously a very unique design and seemingly effective. Its the very first unit that has put my Marantz SA-11S1 SACD player on notice.   This...
  23. mmeysarosh

    TEAC UD-H01 USB DAC

    I wanted to give you my first impressions I have with this little converter. All of my listening so far have been done through the XLR outputs with sources via USB and Coax. Operationally, the unit has performed as expected.   The balance of the sound would bit warm side of neutral. What...
  24. mmeysarosh

    TEAC UD-H01 USB DAC

    Just picked up the unit and testing it out as a DAC. I've only run it for a day and mainly and via its USB and Coax inputs. To be honest, its in company of equipment that it isn't likely to meet in most situations and would not be considered a fair comparison. But I think whatever my findings...
Back
Top