The bias in the question was intentional. The intent was to demonstrate the bias of the LLM by attempting to have the ML engine response limited to audio science and avoid marketing material. The LLM/ML engine was unable to remove the subjective viewpoint from its response.

I can’t pass that test either. My ego thinks I should be able to, but my brain just won’t cooperate. I’m clearly just guessing.

Good question about 3.5 vs. 4.0 Yes, GPT4 is better than GPT3.5 when used by ChatGPT. Microsoft copilot uses a similar architecture to ChatGPT, but does not utilize as full an implementation as ChatGPT and is also very early in its initial public release. I don’t think one could definitively...

I did read it for myself, apparently before you did. Your original post was simply 56%=Pass, with no reference to test sample count. I even referenced the 10 test, 80% Pass from the link. Thanks for catching up though. Without deep diving into the basics of statistical analysis, any single...

Have any balsamic and olive oil for that word salad? Good luck with whatever you’re trying to accomplish here, but I value my time too much to waste it engaging with you.

Typical - you cherry picked from a post you didn’t bother to read. Good to know that you believe any single result from a Google search is an accurate representation of, well, anything. No need for validation or cross reference - someone on the internet posted something, so research complete…...

You conveniently left out the number of trials correlating with a lower % correct to consider passing. I disagree that 56% is a “pass” but your posted link shows that 56% was assuming 160 tests. Your link also shows an 80% success rate as a “pass” with 10 tests. Very few ABX tests and test...

One of the misnomers I frequently observe from audiophiles who stop by Sound Science is conflating the desire to be technically accurate regarding component performance with a race to the bottom where everyone must purchase the least expensive audibly transparent components available. For me...

Enjoy the gear that you like, but refrain from making technical claims without supporting evidence works for me.

Yup. That’s going to require “real” AI that can make independent decisions about the validity of the training data. We’re some time away from that being commercially available. Until then, ML responses are heavily driven by the biases of the coders who decide what content to utilize in their...

Agreed. A simple reworking of the question gets a different response. Still not accurate, but at least less definitive. Follow on to earlier Q. This response is driven by marketing material. Please rewrite using only peer reviewed and evidence based sources ChatGPT 3.5 Studies comparing...

There are certainly some indicators that the poster is utilizing a machine learning solution (the vast majority of what is being called AI is actually ML) but the heavy formatting makes me suspect that the OP is using ML to generate responses that he then edits to fit his desired position and...

Apologies, a little OT but think it’s tangentially relevant to this conversation: An example of how information sources that the ML/AI solution developers choose to target can influence machine learning responses. I suspect ChatGPT has its training pointed at the general internet with...

Suggestion: Stop trying to immediately respond to every post with attempts to find contradictions/minutia and invest that time in actually reading and absorbing the available research and content posted here. That would make for far better discussion going forward. It feels very much like...

Finally! - an audiophile cable design individualized to the owner’s face. Better patent that before someone in the Cables, Power tweaks, and Unicorns section of the forum finds this and beats you to market…

It’s situational. When calculating the trajectory of a rocket launching a payload intended to reach a distant comet, the variance may matter. When discussing virtually any topic related to audible audio reproduction, the difference is completely irrelevant so can be considered the same. You...

There is a very large thread elsewhere on the forum where dozens of people are taking it seriously and have posted descriptions/pictures of their DIY devices. It would be nice if we didn’t allow the same folks to come here and see the existence of posts supporting those devices as supporting...

Good luck blathering your way out of a voided insurance policy. Speaking for myself, I can’t imagine risking my and my family’s safety and/or voiding my insurance over snake oil, but you do you. You can take it from here - I have a personal 3 post maximum for engaging trolls and I’ve reached...

Good luck explaining that to your insurance company. I’m sure they’ll be very understanding… I didn’t say that a DIY ground box would start a fire, but if an uncertified device is being used, it is going to be an issue if you need to make a claim. Same for the rocket surgeons posting about...

That thread should be retitled to “How to void your homeowners/renters insurance” If someone with one of those absurd and uncertified devices has a fire that can be in any way linked to their electrical system, they likely won’t be seeing any financial compensation from their insurer. That...

It doesn't matter to me either. That was just a correction to the OP's claim that the Composer was an Austrian and German product when it is exclusively Austrian

Every track requires the CPU to do something, compressed or not. The thought that a modern computer sees any kind of impactful load from decompressing audio is outdated by approximately 2 decades. I'm not familiar with the technical term "hyperspaz", but assure you that decompressing any...

I’m sure he does know those things, but he consistently and willfully misrepresents the audibility of what he’s measuring in order to sell product to those that don’t have the background to understand that. Human hearing may be variable, but it isn’t unlimited - if his claim required 2x of the...

It’s actually partially understandable. Advertising vendors provide the capital a large site like head-fi needs to pay for operations. As much as I don’t like it, posts that get too far into questioning the claims of those vendors and their customers certainly don’t make they paying vendors...

You’re uneccesarily creating conflict in a discussion where others are trying to find some common ground. I posted that as an observation and stand by it. Hardly a personal attack, that’s an evidence based comment. Edit, not sure why the quote feature didn’t work here, but his is a response...