Hi, before this will be in FS forum, I'd like to put it here first as you all were so helpful - for sale my WA5 + AKG K1K (3years, first owner)   AKG K1000 #04263 - revision done by AKG Acoustic (mar-2011) WA5 • Premium parts upgrade package • Teflon tube sockets upgrade • DC cord length...

Jack cannot see the problem with EML glass after revision. I have asked him twice.

Oh yes! Running via French Totaldac D1 even much more than before.

I have tried 5U4G (Russian, EML mesh), GZ34 and 5R4GY. Like them all. After I bought RSA Duke I prefer 5R4GY.

I love this thread. From time to time come back and read nice posts and believe me or not I am always smiling.   Guys with super technical skills and arguments one by one - what about a nice ABX test 320vbr mp3 vs CD or even 192vbr vs CD? Remember that result 9 or better out of 10... :-)  ...

 For me, 5u4g and 300b stock are fine. Those GEs are quite horrible...

Quote: +1

I am pretty close to buying Klipsch Cornwall III. Let you know how it sounds.   Right now I have 804S - very nice sounding even it is not ideal for WA5 due to 90db sensitivity.   Quote:   Quote:   Quote:

:-))))))))))))))))

I am sorry but I do not understand what is going on here. Maybe I am still missing something here.   I chose the track and you filters and prepared the files. As you said before, filters should not make the difference because sample does not contain much information above 10kHz.   First...

Look, it is only about the concentration. Of course I had unsuccessful attempts before because I am not the robot and which is more important I try to find the weak point in random part of the test track and of course it takes a while to have ears adapted.   I do not want to prove anything...

Quote: No, because I preferred totally random tests and based on logic you have described I thought that all files are more or less equivalent... But of course I can do that next week.  

Currently I am more than happy using Brimar 5R4GY.   Quote:

                   

forgot to attach report file...