Quote:   I haven't said anything against HE-400... Just that if he finds anything wrong with them, he should try to figure out what's wrong in fact in order to avoid disappointment in the future.

Quote:   LOL, I have only advised him what to do if he finds something wrong about the sound of his headphones... Don't you want to tell me then if HD600 measure significantly worse in terms of bass FR in comparison to D5000 that the bass amount is going to be the same in reality, do you...

Quote:   The problem I see here is that people tend to think the more open sound, the better... I do not see it this way. I have owned and heard pretty both pretty open or closed cans and do also prefer rather closed kind of sound. For spatial interpretation, I have TB Isone to do that...

Quote:   I am going to own my LCD-2 rev2 only and do not want anything else... They are just perfect for everything I want or am going to want in near future. It is not a rule even though the majority of people here would most probably find silly to say that they in reality only need one...

Quote:   I think it's more about the amp being coloured in a certain way that "works" better with HE-500...   I would say - use an neutral amp with LCD-2 rev2 or LCD-3, and a warmer one with HE-500.

Quote:   Oh, someone finds rev1 to be more comfortable, interesting to know! :-)   I can see that you like rev1 more... But do you find it more neutral, more versatile regardless the genre and quality? I've tried to EQ them a bit to get them nearer neutrality (against my already...

Quote:   From what I've read about E7 not offering complete 16bit depth in reality and their measurements not being very impressive, I would also at least upgrade on E17...

Quote:   Well, I cannot speak on synergizing etc. as I do not believe in it... I just want a neutral, transparent and powerful amp that is going to work with any pair of headphones that is able to sound great itself (like if you plug the phones directly to your laptop's output or to...

Quote:   Please let me know then what you think on their treble - if it is any offensive or so... If you have some neutral amp, that would be very nice to assess the phones on them. :-)   Official headphone seller from Slovakia told me that he would take both LCD-2 and LCD-3 anytime...

Quote:   Haha, interesting interpretation! Still, I would rather spend 1000USD on a pair of headphones and another 1000USD on music than 2000USD on phones that are going to be at best 15% better :-)

Quote:   I need to disagree here, at least based on my experience with rev2 version...   1) Rev2 version has revised pads and headband and I do find them comfortable enough for long listening sessions (I have had comfortable phones like D7000 or T50RP with FA-003 pads).   2) Rev2...

Quote:   If you really do not need to think about your money, grab LCD-3 (a new pair!) and/or Stax SR-009 (rather for top quality recordings I would say). As you said, LCD-3 are just a refinement of LCD-2 and are going to offer the most versatile performance. I would personally not buy...

Quote:   I even hesitated with option to hear them to "let my posts be more meaningful". But I realised that I would only disagree with my philosophy that if anything is better, it has to be objectively visible... I do not see LCD-3 to look or measure neither 2x, nor 1.5x better than...

Quote:   You cannot get me into the trouble... I wanted to be banned from this site myself. I am here only because of PMs I've got and because of Sell/trade section.   My posts are as meaningful as anyone is going to assess them...

Quote:   They are wrong in your opinion... I accept that.   I have tried to help and said anything I wanted... I am leaving this discussion now. I hope he is going to be satisfied enough with whatever choice.