Recent content by Jazzophile
  1. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    The PX8 is a colored, thick sounding headphone lacking in transparency. It doesn't resolve at a high enough level to make a difference. If you like the tuning and sound then get them in spite of your Samsung's codec limitations. I didn't and returned them. They are very comfortable and the ANC...
  2. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    Well, I decided I would try (at a very steep discount) a pair of B&W PX5 headphones, brand new in the box old stock, since I couldn't enjoy the PX8. I wrote of my experiences earlier this year... I realize the PX5 is a few years old now, and is on-ear vs. over-ear compared to the PX8. The app...
  3. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    I would hardly consider your comments a rant. :xf_cool:
  4. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    You make good points for the general use case of people listening to low-fi or medium-fi material, bit rates and content. YouTube, Pandora, etc. I tend to listen mostly to music, lossless or Ultra Hi Def, via AptX HD, AptX Adaptive or LDAC on my wireless in-ear headphones and over the ear...
  5. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    Enjoy what you enjoy! No apologies required. That is why there are so many darned good brands and models of headphones out there. Better yet, own both!
  6. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    Yes. I did as have a few others. In the right channel of a brand new set. Returned. Second set was perfect. It's a known issue but sporadically appears. Return then and get a replacement.
  7. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    This is so well said. I completely agree. I didn't like their sound signature and returned them. The build quality and tech was all good and fine. The 2 band eq is not enough to correct the sound deficiencies adequately. But I also do not prefer to EQ. If it's deficient out of the box it's...
  8. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    What he said. 🤣 Well said actually. One thing I have noticed is that APTX Adaptive sounds a little more "dynamic" to me than APTX HD. Might be the increased high frequency energy that was addressed above. It presents to me as a slightly increased dynamic range. I never feel as if I am...
  9. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    You would be very hard pressed to notice any differences between 24/48 and 24/96. IMHO the B&W PX8 do not sound sufficiently transparent nor resolving to expose any differences in sampling rates at these levels. And even on a more transparent headphone you'd have a difficult time noticing the...
  10. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    I doubt it will because if memory serves the PX8 also maxes out (internal DAC) at 48 khz, even when using APTX Adaptive. This was discussed many pages ago in this forum.
  11. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    I have a Pixel 8 and have since returned my PX8 for reasons of sound quality. But as far as the tech goes, the Pixel 8 will default to APTX HD. The Pixels do not have a Snapdragon chipset and do not support APTX adaptive. So you will lose out on 96khz sampling rate but will still get 24 bit /...
  12. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    I now have the B&O H95 on order....should be here within a week. Looking forward to trying that out in comparison...
  13. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    I like Peter Bernstein btw, and will check out that record! I was listening to Emmet Cohen, Masters Legacy Series Volume One, Jimmy Cobb. Great sound, great record.
  14. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    LOL. I get it! To each their own....
  15. J

    Bowers and Wilkins PX8 Wireless Discussion

    The issues of the past couple of posts are what makes this a fascinating hobby. I generally agree with Angelom on his points above. To EQ something out of the box to this long term audiophile means there are problems with tonality, timbre and frequency response. Why would we want to listen to...
Back
Top