Oh boy. Sure. What ever. Just answer the questions, particularly the one about how you know what other people feel. If you cannot behave like a scientist, do not pretend to know how to.

Sure. If you dare to. Sure you want me to flaw your test? I am not scared of any testing, what so ever, rather I embrace it. I also embrace my current beliefs, assumptions, experience, and knowledge. Please, send me this test of yours, please explain it in detail, and the ethics of how you will...

In interpretive qualitative research, there is no usage of bias. Bias is related to positivist research, and is not used in the tradition of interpretive research. Actually, objecting to how bias is traditionally used in the nature sciences, rejecting it completely, is so comon, that there is a...

You missed the point, as to virtually reproduce the physics of sounds, by using a headset, compensating for the physics of the head of the listener, on the fly or pre recording. As for using mono recordings, that is how greater parts of the industry work, as it is, right now.

Sure, you did. What do you mean by AVR? I happen to also use the HA-1. It is not the easiest beast to tame, and given what is needed for it, that probably applies to most DACs. Let's just say that I hear plenty of differences using mine. What does that mean. Well it means that you claim to...

That comes down to epistemology. How can you know that you cannot know anything? We all need to accept that cause and effect has its limits, unless we want to go insane. As to what I am saying, is that they ignored their true positive data, and ignored following it up. The conclusion is clearly...

This is getting dumb. Who did you quote? Has he written any paper, that has passed any real scrutiny? Can you please point me to his work? Did you just Google that or is this someone you actually know and a piece of work you actually vetted?

Thanks. I missed that. Sloppy just became fraudulent. It is funny how the lack of real scientific proof for this supposedly proven knowledge is utterly missing, and that nobody in here seem to be able to point to concrete research supporting their claim. Yet there is a substantial level of...

Looking at that paper, it is pretty obvious, that this does not generate universal knowledge. The gear and setup is highly in question, particularly the use of speakers. Also, they do not describe all factors, particularly interconnects of gear and handling of digital noise. The results are only...

About this historical claim about tape recordings, the claim of "indistinguishable from the original" was experience based. And repeatable. If running the same test today, using the exact same setup, the experience would be about the same. That is what is reasonable to expect. There is a need to...

I feel human.

You need to read carefully what you just wrote. If want to get a paper rejected, this is all you need to write. This will get you flunked, on its own. People do get the blunder, right?

I asked for if people knew of any good research on a topic, that implies, at least in any scientific forum I know about, that you know what your recommend and find it good yourself. I actually tired to look it up, in multiple online research databases, and it is not available on those. Given...

@gregorio in post: 13809060 You need to quote me properly, as not to falsify what you claim to be said. As in this post. If you do not comprehend what is being said, you need to be careful at rephrasing quotes. I struggled through your rant, but when you claim that recording individual...