The only time I have experienced differences with audio products with power supplies in the past is when the power isn't clean from the original power supply (even if that supply is USB).
If you read reviews on the M8 many people did them and also bought linear power supplies or built them and experienced 0 difference. Even major audio publications tried it out and didn't experience a difference.
Power supply quality today is inherently good even at a very rock bottom price.
>
for goodness' sake don't trust anybody else's ears! Power supply quality varies greatly. I substituted Hexfreds for diodes in a $6000 preamp and the sound was immensely improved. You may think parts quality is good, but the right part in the right place is what matters. A switching power supply without the right low impedance capacitor at the input to the switcher will >suck. Even if the capacitor used is "good".
Once again this is due to the extremely good IC's of today. Even our "crappy" processes are worlds ahead of what they were 10+ years ago.
>
design matters more than parts.
When you check into the parts used even in most of these large "name brand" audio devices, they are often no different then what is used in cheaper offerings (like ths SMSL and Topping products).
Also the price of these parts are insanely cheap, most DAC's are under $20 for the actual chips. TI has a number of them under $10 (as do most DAC companies) and they are sonically better than what was available 10+ years ago (unless you were in the bleeding edge).
Most of the "highest regarded" OPAmp's come from TI and cost between $0.75 and $10 so when you look at products in the thousands and they are using $50 worth of parts there is no magic there....
>
again design matters more than parts
I actually find it funny to see people swearing by these overpriced niche products that are literally made of the same components as some of the cheap even sometimes portable offerings.
Also every DAC company these days has a competing "flagship" DAC and most companies selling stand-alone DAC's are advertising their ability to have 384 or even 786hz audio decoding or DSD512 playback. When in reality 90%+ of music is 16/44.1 or 24/96 or 24/48.
I'm not saying that 24/192 cannot sound better, but you won't find things recorded like this and if you are a person like me or my wife who actually listen to music for hours on end on a regular basis you can bet that most likely you will be listening to a streaming service that won't go above the aforementioned qualities.
>
many fine quality recordings at 192K and DSD we need to encourage this. But don't equate casual listening with religious audiophilia! We need your support!