MEMT X5 In Ear Earphone

I have an affinity for IEMs equipped with micro-drivers (6mm or smaller). It seems that dynamic micro-drivers that are well tuned can deliver surprisingly good resolution and sometimes surprisingly deep bass with great texture. The MEMT X5 is one such in-ear.

About me:

About IEMs:


The MEMT X5:

This is my very first encounter with MEMT. I typically scour Amazon earphone listings trying to find unique silicone eartips that are shipped with inexpensive in-ear monitors (IEMs). I do this because the audio output that is delivered into my ears (or yours) via an IEM can vary greatly depending not only on tip selection, but in particular, the eartips depth in the ear canal. This simple truth became very real with the MEMT X5.

The MEMT X5 is packaged well and the driver housings are made of a sturdy metal alloy. However, the silicone eartips that MEMT included with the X5 just ruined the X5's presentation for me, hence the eartip hunting on Amazon. The X5's are shipped with double-flanged silicone eartips which rarely fit my shallow ear canals. To my surprise, these double-flanged silicones actually did fit my ear canals and I was visibly excited that I found a double-flange that I would be able to test on multiple IEMs in order to fine tune the audio output of any IEM in my vast collection. The first IEM to undergo testing would of course be this X5. I had heard good things about the MEMT X5 and I was anxiously waiting to get a pair to find out if the hype is justified.

So how do the X5's sound?

Well, with the included eartips, not so great. The soundstage was congested and the overall presentation was muddy. To my ears it sounded as if all of the instruments were smeared together with no sense of spacial cues for instruments or anything else. It was worse than one of my very first inexpensive IEMs, the Creative EP630.

The only reasonable thing to do was to pull those double-flange eartips off of the X5 and install a wide-bore silicone eartip, which is exactly what I did.

WHAT A HUGE DIFFERENCE BECAUSE THE X5 CAME ALIVE!

The X5 presentation is quite natural though it is undoubtedly a "V" shaped sound signature. With different eartips the soundstage opened up considerably giving a much better sense of width and depth. As is typical of "V" shaped sound signatures the midrange is recessed and slightly hollow compared to the elevated lower treble and bass. It's not off-putting, just noticeable (to me).

Treble:
When you receive your MEMT X5 take note of the treble extension on the following tracks which have a bit of energy up top. Notice how much detail is displayed despite the X5's rolled-off upper-treble for a fatigue-free session.


Midrange:
The midrange is the X5's weakness, so to speak, because it sits behind the lower and higher frequency ranges. Fleetwood Mac's "Dreams" is one of my go-to tracks to judge vocal positioning and the MEMT X5 fails here. Stevie Nicks voice is lost in the "thunder though you will be able to pick out which of the two recordings below sound more analogue and less "digitized". Just remember that the X5 is all about the "fun" and definitely not for critical listening.



Lately, I've acquired an addiction for micro-details and soundstage and the X5 mostly delivers on both accounts. The X5 can give a detailed presentation, but it eschews taking things to the "Nth"degree in the treble region, which means you'll get plenty of detail but your listening sessions will remain fatigue-free.

Bass:
The low end comes through with surprising authority for a micro-dynamic driver. I really like the heft and body of the overall presentation. The lion's share of the bass is mid-bass but there is just enough rumble and punch to keep me happy.



Casting aside the included double-flanged eartips and refitting the X5 with wide-bore silicone eartips transforms them and cleans things up noticeably. The end result of using two different types of eartips is that you wouldn't recognize the two different presentations as coming from the same exact IEM.

An unintended fringe benefit with the MEMT X5 is that they can be worn while sleeping because they are so small, so if you want an IEM that can pull double duty by working graveyard shift, then "ding...ding...ding"... you've just hit the jackpot.

There's a lot of competition in this price bracket, but there is alot to like for your $20 with the X5, especially if you'd like something comfortable and unobtrusive when your head hits the pillow.

The difficulty for the MEMT X5 in the current marketplace is that you can get whichever sound signature you prefer WITH DETACHABLE CABLES from KZ Acoustics for less than $20.

Ouch!



Hope this was helpful.

Disclaimer: i was given a free sample from ak audio in order to give a fair opinion.
So now whe are going to review the hype Budget iem! Is the well known memt x5, with in the box some double flange tips, chin slider. some pics

Build quality and durability

As you can see is also all made from metal, the housings, the plug and also the microphone. There are not so many in ears that are made from metal and let me tell you that this iem will last you a long time and of course why i said that? Because after test it i have using about 8 months, so no problem. The bad is the springly cable and sometimes the fit, but you can past it above the ear to prevent the microphonics and problem solved.


Sound

How about the sound? Of course is one of the best questions and let me tell you that for this price only in sound is unbeatable better tan many competitors but whe are going to talk it in the comparisons section. Also is very easy to drive and its perfect for mobile uses that i commonly use. Also is the best partner for your mobile, with that micro dynamic driver and that sensitivity.

Soundstage:

The soundstage is big for this tiny monster, but not so good when a lot of intruments came in, but it certainly with 4 instruments in the band are certainly pretty good lol.

Lows

This is one of the best parts, the memt can go pretty low and you can fell the rumble! But sometimes the bast is a little bit boost in the center of the music and in certains songs like in the incubus álbum “morning view” and sometimes lack in definition but further in that… its not certanly a complain.

Mids

The mids are well separated but sometimes the bass ge tinto the mids (bass control problem) but they have a nice slightly warm and clean mids, you can also feel sometimes some in the stage moments when the guitar with the distorion with a power chord gets in your face! Pretty cool for this iem.


Highs

The highs are not piercing and are a little bit exciting but it seem that are alittle bit in the background that is great when a shiny guitar solo comes in but at least it have some definition and some crytal clear highs.

Comparison

Well this is the intereting part, with all the iems below under $20 dollars and all new iems get released like every 2 months with this quality, its difficult to compete with the memt x5 due to their build quality and sound kicking asses to some old earphones like soundmagic e10, e50 and maybe e80 so thats why im not even compare it in this time.


Memt x5 vs rock zircón

I certainly dont like the hype of the rock zircón it have a little better mids tan the soundmagic e10 and also nowadays the soundmagic its not a competitor. Lets back to it, the rock zircón does not have so much definition in the bass región make in it muddy, the mids are ok but the highs in the memt have better definition, the mids are better in the memt and everything else lol and with more durability.

Memt vs tennmak pro

This one is very tight and you maybe what to choose in what sound you like, if you want a more lively sound and some better bass, choose the memt but if you want a more analythical sound, better separation, mmcx cable and you have a nice dap… choose the tennmak pro that are also one of my favourites Budget iem.

Memt vs urban fun

The urbanfun is hybrid iem that certainly is better but not for so much. The mids in the urban fun are more cristal clear, not so warm and not so much in sound getting those mids more acurrate but some what the cymbals and the hi hat in the drum kit is clearly better defined in the memt x5. In the bass department is more controled in the urban fun and voice are a little more clear thank to the ba. In the build quality is better in the memt and winning in the durability test.




Now the question if its really worth it and let me tell you it is! With a ridiculous price of between 17 and 20 usd is defintely a pick if you want a perfect partner for your mobile and you want to leave your dap in the house, its just perfect. So here is nowehere to lose… you only loose if you dont try these tiny dubstep, electronical music and rock monsters!

Thanks for Reading and until next time


Source used:

Cayin n3

Oneplus 3t

Greetings Head-fi!
 
Today we are going to take a quick look at the MEMT X5, a punchy little micro-driver that's been gaining some popularity as of late.
 
I'm a big fan of micro-drivers and am always on the lookout for something new and exciting in the field. When the X5 cropped up and was gathering steam I hummed and hawed about picking up a pair. Luckily, @Rvtrav was nice enough to lend me his pair for a couple weeks. I'm very thankful he did because while I think the X5 is worth the money and a good earphone for those that enjoy a powerful, v-shaped signature, I don't quite feel they live up to the hype. Let's look at why.
 
Disclaimer:
 
I do not own the MEMT X5. I simply borrowed a pair for two weeks to satisfy my curiosity and to write this review. Big thanks to @RvTrav for the loaner. The thoughts within this review do not represent anyone but myself.
 

---

 
 
 

---

 
Packaging and Accessories:
 
The X5 comes is a very solid, sky blue package with a small viewing window showing off the compact, attractive earpieces. Flipping open the magnetically sealed front panel reveals the large X5 logo on a small cardboard box and earpieces embedded, all covered by a plastic sheet. It's a very neat and tidy presentation. The included accessories are pretty barren, limited to three sets of oddly petite bi-flange tips in s/m/l sizes, and a handy velcro strap.
 
Overall a pretty basic unboxing experience.
 

---

 
 

---

 
Build, Design, Comfort, and Isolation:
 
Earphones with tiny drivers tend to be pretty tiny themselves. The X5 is small, but not quite as compact as some of the smaller micro-driver based earphones I've got, like the MusicMaker TW1 or ToneKing Light V.2. It's positively massive compared to the AAW Q, but that statement applies to pretty much everything. The X5 also feels quite dense and weighty, something I attribute to the magnets added to the housings.
 
Material quality is excellent but fit and finish needs some work, especially around the nozzles where things don't fit in place as cleanly as I would prefer. The Xiaomi Piston 3rd gen has clearly been put together with greater care and precision.
 
The cable is made up of four intertwined strands covered in a somewhat stiff, durable sheath. It's a nice cable, but isn't overly flexible. Worn cable over-ear to help deal with the overly invasive microphonics, it constantly tries to pop up over your ear. Strain relief at the excellent 90 degree jack is well implemented, and is decent leading into the earpieces. There is no strain relief around the y-split or in-line mic.
 
Comfort and ergonomics are quite nice once you find a set of tips that fit the smaller than average nozzle. No complaints here.
 
The X5 isolates better than most other dynamic driver based earphones I've used. When paired with my Piston 2 triple flange tips, they blocked out a good 80% (a guess of course) of external noise when walking out and about. If you want to shut yourself out from the outside world, these will surely do it for you.
 
Overall they X5 is a decently well-constructed and comfortable earphone. The cable could definitely benefit from replacement with something more flexible and less microphonic.
 

---

 
 

---

 
Sound:
 
Tips: The X5 is extremely sensitive to tip selection and placement. Combine that with the smaller than average nozzle size which limits tip options, it was a bit annoying. I found that the closer the driver was to you ear, the clearer and more detailed they sounded. Unfortunately, this also increased the bass incrementally. Eventually I settled on Piston 2 triple flange tips which gave me the best balance of bass quantity and technical performance.
 
The X5 has been lauded for excellent sound quality, wowing many with their powerful presentation. While I certainly think they're an enjoyable earphone and offer up a fun and capable v-shaped signature, they are not without their flaws.
 
The X5's presents you with a non-fatiguing and fairly naturally toned sound. Their powerful presentation comes with a strong sensation of weight behind the sound it outputs. This lead to me hear them as thick, heavy, and fairly sluggish, which on the other hand gave their bass some real authority; it's a very bass-driven earphone to my ears.
 
Their treble presentation is clean and crisp but lacks upper end extension putting more of it's focus on the lower treble regions. It's not an earphone that displays sparkling, shimmery sounds overly well, but at least this means their treble is non-fatiguing. I also found the upper ranges lacking in airiness and detail, especially compared to other similarly priced micro-driver units like the SOMiC V4 and VJJB K2S.
 
The mid-range is my least favorite aspect of the X5, sitting much too far back in the mix. It is isn't as much of an issue with rock, but genres with more reliance on a robust low end (EDM and Hip Hop for example) see a fair bit of bleed from the abundant mid-bass; vocals, especially female, start to feel like an afterthought even if the track is supposed to be vocally driven. This presentation really hurts on pop tracks like Jessie J's "Bang Bang".
 
Bass on the X5 is their most impressive aspect, by far. It has an undeniably strong presence that impresses with a powerful and impactful delivery. Extension for a micro-driver is excellent, giving you a visceral rumble rarely felt in drivers of this size. Mid-bass is still the most prominent and is overly prominent and bloated at times, such as on Gorillaz's "Kids With Guns". The weighty, somewhat sluggish nature of the driver tends to get in the way on quicker, more complex tracks. On Skrillex's "Scary Monster and Nice Sprites (Dirtyphonics Remix)", DnB elements are introduced during the last half. The rapid drumming combined with slow heavy basslines trips up the X5 and they get a bit muddy.
 
The X5's imaging and soundstage qualities I found, well, severely lacking. Compared to the similarly priced SOMiC V4, they feel overly confined and just don't move sound around much. On Aesop Rock's "Sabbatical With Options", background vocals are constantly shifting from channel to channel in the background. On the V4 they seems to swirl around in a circle around your head, extending out past your shoulders. On the X5, it's ear to ear on a flat plain. The difference is night and day.
 
I found the X5 most enjoyable with uncomplicated and simplistic tracks. They present listeners with an undeniably fun and entertaining listen, and as long as you listen for entertainment and not critically, it's pretty easy to overlook the sub-par imaging and mid-range recession.
 

---

 
 

---

 
Select Comparison:
 
MusicMaker TW1 (~20 USD): The worst thing about the X5 is the existence of TW1. It's tuned virtually the same, but with a smoother, more liquid presentation. They still hit harder than most micro-drivers, but lack the weight the X5 puts behind every hit of bass. Treble is a little smoother with more detail. The extra presence in the upper ranges gives them some sparkle sorely missing from the X5. Their mid-range is also more forward in the mix, less effected by their somewhat excessive mid-bass hump. Imaging and soundstage are significantly improved on the TW1, letting songs breathe in a way the X5 simply can't.
 
The TW1 is also better built using similarly durable materials but with better fit and finish. The cable is less microphonic, more flexible, and holds less memory. It's also lighter and ever so slightly more comfortable.
 
The TW1 straight up comes across to me as the better built, more balanced, and technically competent bass-focused micro-driver. When I got mine they sold for around 16 USD. While they're selling closer to 20 USD now, that extra couple bucks is worth it over the X5 in my opinion.
 
Final Thoughts:
 
I went into the X5 with pretty lofty expectations, fair considering the amount of hype they're getting at the moment. While I wouldn't buy a set for myself after experiencing them over the last couple weeks, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to someone that wants a fun, well-tuned, v-shaped earphone under 20 bucks.
 
The X5 looks and feels great, they isolate supremely well, and their bass hits harder than pretty much any micro-driver I've heard. Heck, they hit harder than most budget earphones period. Despite all it's sonic flaws the X5 remains a very enjoyable listen.
 
Thanks for reading!
 
- B9Scrambler
 
***** ***** ***** ***** *****
 
Test Songs:
 
Aesop Rock - Saturn Missles
Aesop Rock - Sabbatical With Options
BT - The Antikythera Mechanism
Daft Punk - Touch
Gramatik - Bluestep (Album Version)
Incubus - 2nd/3rd/4th Movements of the Odyssey
Infected Mushroom - Deeply Disturbed
Infected Mushroom - The Legend of the Black Shawarma
Jessie J - Bang Bang
Kiesza - Hideaway
King Crimson - Starless and Bible Black
Pink Floyd - Money
Run The Jewels - Oh My Darling (Don't Cry)
Skrillex - Scary Monster and Nice Sprites (Dirtyphonics Remix)
Supertramp - Rudy
The Prodigy - Get Your Fight On