dude_500
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Posts
- 467
- Likes
- 38
I'm wondering why the T2 is better than the BH. I fully understand both schematics, although I'm not at a level to say that one particular aspect will make or break the sound quality.
As far as I'm seeing it, the only significant difference is that the T2 has an extra +-100V of swing, a servo, and a different input stage. There are a bunch of other subtle changes, and like I said, I don't have the experience to say which subtle changes are critical. The output stage is effectively the same. Also, given that the output stage is the same, I definitely don't understand how the T2 is "more powerful" as people seem to say.
For reference, T2: http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/t2schem.pdf
BH: http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/bluehawaii_moda1.png
As far as I'm seeing it, the only significant difference is that the T2 has an extra +-100V of swing, a servo, and a different input stage. There are a bunch of other subtle changes, and like I said, I don't have the experience to say which subtle changes are critical. The output stage is effectively the same. Also, given that the output stage is the same, I definitely don't understand how the T2 is "more powerful" as people seem to say.
For reference, T2: http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/t2schem.pdf
BH: http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/bluehawaii_moda1.png