UCLA 15
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Posts
- 165
- Likes
- 19
Quote:
There's virtually 0 reason to worry. The M-80s aren't sibilant at all. Val has repeatedly said that he is against exaggerated or peaky mids and highs, and the M-80s are total proof that he means it when he says it. The M-100s may (and hopefully will) deliver greater clarity and detail, but not sibilance or peakiness.
When non-audiophile calls something bright I instantly think them mean more detail. I had people call my miles davis tributes, and B&W p5's "Bright" they oth had beats solo's. What I have noticed a lot is that the beats solos are the muddiest and most disgusting sounding headphones that people own and always use them as reference to "Neutral headphones" even some reviewers do which is why I wouldn't trust anyone who isn't an audiophile to review headphones. Also the fact that this cnet guy couldn't even compare these to the m80's which the m100's are truly succeeding goes to show how he doesn't know ****.
Then comes to the question of if these are truly "bright". I have swayed away from denon's latest models because they are too bright and sibilance. If the m100 is anymore sibilant then the m80's then that would be a no go and would cause for me to ask for a refund.
There's virtually 0 reason to worry. The M-80s aren't sibilant at all. Val has repeatedly said that he is against exaggerated or peaky mids and highs, and the M-80s are total proof that he means it when he says it. The M-100s may (and hopefully will) deliver greater clarity and detail, but not sibilance or peakiness.