planx
Might be Ironman, or some fat kid.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Posts
- 1,945
- Likes
- 61
1P2 Generalized: A really fun sounding IEM. By the end of the day, I can really say that the sound grew on me. I constantly changed from the 1P2 to PFE232 to ER-4S and to the K3003i so I tried being as fair to the 1P2 as I can. I definitely need a longer listen with the 1P2, but I was quite impressed.
1P2 + T1 amp: For others, an excellent match, for me, it was a pretty good match. The T1 with other IEMs, like the Audeo PFE232, felt like the bass was overwhelming, but with the 1P2, the bass was very strong and well controlled. I really like the bass from the 1P2 and liked it even more with the T1. Mids are brought forward more than listening to the 1P2 unamped, IMO nothing overly special about the mids. Quite warm sounding, very lush and full. With the PFE232, they really bring out female vocals, but with the 1P2, it feels like female vocals are just OKAY. A bit too thick sounding and maybe a bit muffled for my tastes. Both GG and I really adore good mids, and the 1P2 fell a bit short on producing special vocals with the T1 in my views. Treble is hard to explain. Noticeable sibilance at lower treble and after it sounds fine. Especially with Bjork’s “s” and “t”. People who likes a fun sound should find these two a great match.
1P2 + O2: Another good match was the O2 amp. Bass quantity was a bit short than the T1, but this is expected because the O2 is known to be a fairly neutral amp compared to the T1 and C421. Bass is much faster. Mids, surprise surprise… The 1P2 with O2 definitely sounds “cleaner” and “thinner” than the T1. This might be due to Cold Amp+Warm 1P2? Surprisingly good synergy between the two. YES FINALLY… Female vocals are considered “great” now by my standards. Much leaner and clearer than the T1 and this is all a preference thing. I think the Mids sounds much better on the O2 than the T1. Treble sibilance is still noticeable with the O2, no question about it. Again, the O2 just “feels” better in the treble to my ears. The T1 sounded a bit muffled, but the O2 sounds much clearer. Same story with the PFE232 with the two amps. I found the Treble much clearer and expressive on the O2 compared to the T1.
[size=11.0pt]My verdict? I think the O2 makes the 1P2 sound cleaner. But, I really love the way the T1 makes the 1P2 sound even more fun. The bass is really topnotch. T1 better than the O2? O2 better than the T1? Neither. They are just two different amps for different tastes.[/size]
1P2 VS PFE232 (Grey Filter): The 1P2 bass was both more impactful and cleaner than the PFE232. Go Dynamic driver! Male vocals were on par IMO. Neither achieves anything special here. Both are pretty good at it, but I always have high standards for mids. Overall, the PFE232 had better female vocals amped and unamped, but the 1P2 really surprised me with the O2 amp. Female vocals actually went from “pretty good” to “very enjoyable”. Something I couldn’t experience with the T1 amp. Treble, I think the PFE232 hits every sweetspot in the treble and that’s why I enjoy it oh so much. The PFE232 has a good amount of sparkle and isn’t overly aggressive. The sibilance is quite noticeable on the 1P2 and I rarely notice sibilance. Just something about the 1P2 with its lower treble/upper midrange that bothers me. Other than that little sibilance issue, really good treble. I found the treble to be a bit aggressive, but not upfront at all… I found this a bit odd and I asked GG if he thought the same thing. Treble situates nicely with the “fun” presentation the 1P2 demonstrates without being too hot or sparkly. The 1P2 soundstage felt both deeper and wider than the PFE232. Both has excellent instrument separation, felt that the 1P2 was better than the PFE232 in terms of instrument separation and soundstage depth and size.
1P2 VS AKG K3003i:
NOTE- I the comparison between the two was done at a shorter time frame than the 1P2 VS PFE232. Also, the Reference Filter was used.
No question, the bass on the 1P2 was more impactful. Control wise, they both seemed to do an excellent job at it. Mids on the K3003i sound much more forward, extremely detailed and really polite sounding. No signs of any Grado-like aggression here. I wouldn’t say that it’s subtle or soft, but it’s a forward and polite sound. String instruments like the Cello sound superb on the K3003i. Again, the K3003i is polite in the treble. A touch of sparkle without being aggressive. The 1P2 also had a nice touch of sparkle, but seemed overly aggressive. I just keep finding the K3003i to be overly polite and lose a sense of fun. Compared to the 1P2 it’s really Toyota Camry (K3003i) vs Ford Mustang (1P2), IN TERMS OF FUN. You can see the 1P2 doing doughnuts if it was really a car and you can see the K3003i just driving like a normal citizen; blending in, not doing anything radical in anyway. This was the sole reason why I chose the PFE232 over the K3003i. The K3003i may do things more things “correctly”, but both the PFE232 and 1P2 puts a smile over your face. Both are packed with FUN (Either you like it or you don’t) while the K3003i seems to be the socially neutral type (accepted by everyone, no reason to hate it but also not many reasons to love it). However, on a critical listening session, the K3003i is an absolute treat. Instrument separation is one of the best I’ve listened to. Reminds me of the Ety ER-4S with much more body and definition. I just felt that the 1P2 was better for pure enjoyment. In terms of fun, without a doubt the 1P2. In terms of detail and critical listening, the K3003i seems to dominate that market. I actually prefer it to the ER-4S because the ER-4S is TOO serious and the K3003i has more fun to it, even though I’ve been complaining how it sounds boring COMPARED to the 1P2.
1P2 + T1 amp: For others, an excellent match, for me, it was a pretty good match. The T1 with other IEMs, like the Audeo PFE232, felt like the bass was overwhelming, but with the 1P2, the bass was very strong and well controlled. I really like the bass from the 1P2 and liked it even more with the T1. Mids are brought forward more than listening to the 1P2 unamped, IMO nothing overly special about the mids. Quite warm sounding, very lush and full. With the PFE232, they really bring out female vocals, but with the 1P2, it feels like female vocals are just OKAY. A bit too thick sounding and maybe a bit muffled for my tastes. Both GG and I really adore good mids, and the 1P2 fell a bit short on producing special vocals with the T1 in my views. Treble is hard to explain. Noticeable sibilance at lower treble and after it sounds fine. Especially with Bjork’s “s” and “t”. People who likes a fun sound should find these two a great match.
1P2 + O2: Another good match was the O2 amp. Bass quantity was a bit short than the T1, but this is expected because the O2 is known to be a fairly neutral amp compared to the T1 and C421. Bass is much faster. Mids, surprise surprise… The 1P2 with O2 definitely sounds “cleaner” and “thinner” than the T1. This might be due to Cold Amp+Warm 1P2? Surprisingly good synergy between the two. YES FINALLY… Female vocals are considered “great” now by my standards. Much leaner and clearer than the T1 and this is all a preference thing. I think the Mids sounds much better on the O2 than the T1. Treble sibilance is still noticeable with the O2, no question about it. Again, the O2 just “feels” better in the treble to my ears. The T1 sounded a bit muffled, but the O2 sounds much clearer. Same story with the PFE232 with the two amps. I found the Treble much clearer and expressive on the O2 compared to the T1.
[size=11.0pt]My verdict? I think the O2 makes the 1P2 sound cleaner. But, I really love the way the T1 makes the 1P2 sound even more fun. The bass is really topnotch. T1 better than the O2? O2 better than the T1? Neither. They are just two different amps for different tastes.[/size]
1P2 VS PFE232 (Grey Filter): The 1P2 bass was both more impactful and cleaner than the PFE232. Go Dynamic driver! Male vocals were on par IMO. Neither achieves anything special here. Both are pretty good at it, but I always have high standards for mids. Overall, the PFE232 had better female vocals amped and unamped, but the 1P2 really surprised me with the O2 amp. Female vocals actually went from “pretty good” to “very enjoyable”. Something I couldn’t experience with the T1 amp. Treble, I think the PFE232 hits every sweetspot in the treble and that’s why I enjoy it oh so much. The PFE232 has a good amount of sparkle and isn’t overly aggressive. The sibilance is quite noticeable on the 1P2 and I rarely notice sibilance. Just something about the 1P2 with its lower treble/upper midrange that bothers me. Other than that little sibilance issue, really good treble. I found the treble to be a bit aggressive, but not upfront at all… I found this a bit odd and I asked GG if he thought the same thing. Treble situates nicely with the “fun” presentation the 1P2 demonstrates without being too hot or sparkly. The 1P2 soundstage felt both deeper and wider than the PFE232. Both has excellent instrument separation, felt that the 1P2 was better than the PFE232 in terms of instrument separation and soundstage depth and size.
1P2 VS AKG K3003i:
NOTE- I the comparison between the two was done at a shorter time frame than the 1P2 VS PFE232. Also, the Reference Filter was used.
No question, the bass on the 1P2 was more impactful. Control wise, they both seemed to do an excellent job at it. Mids on the K3003i sound much more forward, extremely detailed and really polite sounding. No signs of any Grado-like aggression here. I wouldn’t say that it’s subtle or soft, but it’s a forward and polite sound. String instruments like the Cello sound superb on the K3003i. Again, the K3003i is polite in the treble. A touch of sparkle without being aggressive. The 1P2 also had a nice touch of sparkle, but seemed overly aggressive. I just keep finding the K3003i to be overly polite and lose a sense of fun. Compared to the 1P2 it’s really Toyota Camry (K3003i) vs Ford Mustang (1P2), IN TERMS OF FUN. You can see the 1P2 doing doughnuts if it was really a car and you can see the K3003i just driving like a normal citizen; blending in, not doing anything radical in anyway. This was the sole reason why I chose the PFE232 over the K3003i. The K3003i may do things more things “correctly”, but both the PFE232 and 1P2 puts a smile over your face. Both are packed with FUN (Either you like it or you don’t) while the K3003i seems to be the socially neutral type (accepted by everyone, no reason to hate it but also not many reasons to love it). However, on a critical listening session, the K3003i is an absolute treat. Instrument separation is one of the best I’ve listened to. Reminds me of the Ety ER-4S with much more body and definition. I just felt that the 1P2 was better for pure enjoyment. In terms of fun, without a doubt the 1P2. In terms of detail and critical listening, the K3003i seems to dominate that market. I actually prefer it to the ER-4S because the ER-4S is TOO serious and the K3003i has more fun to it, even though I’ve been complaining how it sounds boring COMPARED to the 1P2.