The Xonar Essence STX Q/A, tweaking, impressions thread
May 17, 2010 at 6:17 PM Post #1,804 of 5,722
the other chip is on the bottom side....two single opamps on an adapter will alway sound FAR better than a dual opamp, so I'd advise to learn how to solder and not waste your time: http://tangentsoft.net/elec/movies/
 
it's far easier than it seems, just get a 30W iron and some low melting point solder
popcorn.gif

 
May 17, 2010 at 7:11 PM Post #1,806 of 5,722
not sure, but dual mono always kills stereo in the audio world...even TI acknowledged the problem, but still failed blatantly as two OPA1611 do sound much better than one OPA1612: http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/opa1612.html
 
 The dual version features completely independent circuitry for lowest crosstalk and freedom from interactions between channels

 
May 17, 2010 at 8:10 PM Post #1,807 of 5,722
Well i'm still confused by all this. When you recommend LT1363 (avail here  http://www.linear.com/pc/productDetail.jsp?navId=H0,C1,C1154,C1009,C1022,P1108 ) or someone else reccomends a AD797BRZ (avail here http://www.analog.com/en/other-products/militaryaerospace/ad797/products/product.html )  how do i read off those chip types and know which will need adaptors because they are singles and which won't?
 
 
May 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM Post #1,811 of 5,722
Thanks. That makes a lot of sense actually. This thread has been full of so much awesome information
 
By the way, i've downloaded those videos on how-to solder and will be watching them soon. They should help when my friend teaches me how to do it myself.
 
 
May 18, 2010 at 4:37 AM Post #1,812 of 5,722
I think i've settled my opamp little adventure by choosing LME49720HA on I/V with LT1364 on buffer. The sound is so clear with lot of musical detail and  bass has enough quantity as well.
With LM4562NA on buffer the sound was as clear as crystal but lack of bass extension i though.
With OPA2134 on buffer the sound was muddy, bass was to much and the high was dull. i don't know if it called warm but i didn't like it.
 
Someone has suggested LT1364 opamp somewhere on this thread to compensate the lack of bass quantity in LM4562. I thank you for that. To bad i can't continue my curious for other opamps variation because every little opamp here must be buy to get with high price as well.
 
May 18, 2010 at 8:55 PM Post #1,813 of 5,722


Quote:
Thanks. You know, i did have the thought "I wonder if a single opamp sounds better than a dual in the way that a single ended tube sound better than a push-pull"
 
Is it a similar situation?



Yes, common opamp information posted in the DIY opamps thread.  If you are looking for good opamp information, that woudl be the place to get it.  IIRC, the 1364 dual and 1363 singles weren't that popular using these cards.  Your tastes may vary.
 
May 19, 2010 at 12:33 PM Post #1,815 of 5,722


Quote:
Yes, common opamp information posted in the DIY opamps thread.  If you are looking for good opamp information, that woudl be the place to get it.  IIRC, the 1364 dual and 1363 singles weren't that popular using these cards.  Your tastes may vary.


Thanks for the info and the pointer!  *starts to read* There are almost 3k posts in that thread! wow.  *falls over dead*
 
It would be great if we had some sort of indexing system where a person could look up a chart of these opamps and see (on a score of  1 - 10) which what amount of highs, lows, soundstaging, grain, etc.
 
There seem to be hundreds of combonations and a person could spend lots of time and money doing this.
 
I know we can't really ask "What's the best?" as it all depends on one's system and hearing, but if we know our systems well enough we know that we'll want an opamp that's darker to tame a bright speaker or faster to improve a sludgy big woofer system.
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top