[Whitigir]

Wow!! Whatever we have been studying and thinking that we do know is merely an illusions. When illusions are paired with more illusions then everything become messy !!!

Anyways, is it Digital ?
https://holometer.fnal.gov/faq.html

 

[chef8489]

Only if you are in the matrix.

 

[Whitigir]

Only if you are in the matrix.

And what is to prove that we are not ?

 

[Whazzzup]

#$%^@!$*^& sound of maths being done #&)*@!&% more sound of maths

 

[Raketen]

Reality pixels!

 

[Whitigir]

Reality pixels!

So, our reality is infinitely small and at the same time can also be infinitely large. It means we may be a virus to some infinite large body, or we may be the DNA protein block for an infinite large body ? Or we are in a matrix with layers that keeps going on infinitely by doubling or....halves .... ?

Are we 1 or are we 0 ?

 

[Spareribs]

The size of the universe is approximately 93 billion light years in diameter.

In theory, there could be another newer earth that’s younger than our planet and those people are experiencing their own 2000 B.C. in their timeline.

 

[SilverEars]

We don't know schiit. Period. And there are crazy people in this world. We can't even know enough to control a virus.

 

[Hifiearspeakers]

We don't know schiit. Period. And there are crazy people in this world. We can't even know enough to control a virus.

If scientists are right about dark matter and dark energy making up 95% of the substance of the universe, then that means the visible and known universe represents 5%. 5%!!!!

So to put it another way, we don’t understand 95% of the universe! So to quote SilverEars, “We don’t know schiit.”

 

[gimmeheadroom]

Music is analog. Most people have never heard any.

 

[lantian]

And what is to prove that we are not ?

Psyhedelics though they are illegal in most parts of the world.

 

[gleanfont]

There might be a parallel universe out there There are studies made, but still unproven. Worst, until we die, we are living in that uncertainty.

 

[coolhand]

I don't know why people continue to debate this, the answer was long ago found to be 42.

However the following video perfectly explains why the persistence of disbelief remains, especially for audiophiles:

 

[SilverEars]

When mathematicians say they proved existence of this or that, it makes no sense. They pretty much throw empirical evidence out the window, and think their abstract world leads them to the truth. The worst thing is, it has not been proven by their formulations (which isn't how things are really proven). What they state has to be proven in the real world, or there really is no proof. AT least physicists and engineers are practical because they will verify the theories.

If we look at a lot of things that's inferenced by science of history, they cannot be proven, and will most likely not be all the precise.

Have we ever seen something that unexpected than what we predicted happen? Like the black swan showing up all of a sudden? That's reality, the world cannot be abstracted. Abstraction is looking at a particular aspect of the world in a simple light, and should be used for practical purposes, and nothing more than that. You cannot answer about the world from abstraction because abstraction is the process of ignoring aspects it chooses to ignore. You cannot know a whole by ignoring aspects.

 

[gimmeheadroom]

When mathematicians say they proved existence of this or that, it makes no sense. They pretty much throw empirical evidence out the window, and think their abstract world leads them to the truth. The worst thing is, it has not been proven by their formulations (which isn't how things are really proven). What they state has to be proven in the real world, or there really is no proof. AT least physicists and engineers are practical.

If we look at a lot of things that's inferenced by science of history, they cannot be proven, and will most likely not be all the precise.

Wow! This is just like audio scientology where listening to the gear is offensive and irrelevant!