lohrm1@excite.co
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
- Posts
- 96
- Likes
- 13
Quote:
I'd agree. I thought that the voice was much more realistic on the triple.fi's than the Shures. I think it probably varies from recording to recording. I also think that there's a difference between sounding good and sounding accurate. I usually listen for accuracy, which (to me) means that it's closest to what's actually on the recording. Something may "sound better" to some people, but it may not be accurate. I don't happen to think the Shures are very accurate even though they sound very good.
Originally Posted by hockeyb213 /img/forum/go_quote.gif haha that is really interesting comment I feel exactly the opposite I felt the voice was a little distant on the shure's |
I'd agree. I thought that the voice was much more realistic on the triple.fi's than the Shures. I think it probably varies from recording to recording. I also think that there's a difference between sounding good and sounding accurate. I usually listen for accuracy, which (to me) means that it's closest to what's actually on the recording. Something may "sound better" to some people, but it may not be accurate. I don't happen to think the Shures are very accurate even though they sound very good.